He knows very good lawyers. I hope that he sues. Update – It’s been a good week for the NDP.
78 Replies to ““I have very good vision. I know what I saw,””
Mathyssen*s distortional reach from what could have been a Victoria Secret ad to the slaying of women in a Quebec University shows such a wild lack of logic it should disqualify her from office.
Even those who *never watch television* realize that every second advert features a scantily clad woman. = TG
Dipper lady should be sued. Sure, there’s an apology now, but in a few years it’ll enter the public mythology as “that tory that was surfing porn” and the left will repeat it endlessly. Any settlement can go to charity.
This is the angle that should bring her down: she is violating the privacy of Moore. I thought the NDP was a Chump-ion of privacy rights? What is she doing invading his cyber-bedroom anyway? I thought the government has no place in Canadians bedrooms. Too many double standards here.
The real kicker to me in all of this is that for years we’ve been admonished by feminists, male and female, that politics must become more even handed; that once there are more women in the house, it will regain some decorum. Indeed Dion is still prattling on about his plan for male/female electoral equalization.
If this is what happens when we have a stronger cadre of women in the house I would hate to see a 50/50 split. If we then elect a bunch of “church lady” type busybodies who have nothing better to do but become offended on behalf of women everywhere whenever some man says or does something that hurts their little female feelings, I think I’d rather stick with the old boy rule. Now that I think about it, Dion kind of resembles the “church lady”.
To gain some semblance of credibility as full play elected officials as opposed to single track nincompoops, they ought to turn down dial on the misogynist-seeking missiles just a tad.
“I thought the NDP was a Chump-ion of privacy rights?”
Well I guess you made my point for me Doug…the Dips really don’t know what they stand for…they only know what they are against and their cranky detached value system has them bearing a grudge against just about everything and everybody.
As they sit now I wouldn’t be shocked to see them ban “fun”…to this latest gen of Dips anything that people do that gives them pleasure probably is at odds with some tenet of misanthropic Dip philosphy.
If he were to look at pictures Sven Robertson in the gay calender it would have been okay.
That’s on of the “intellectual” followers of Tommy Douglas you saw there. In any event, why was she spying on another member’s screen? And we thought Stephane Dion was a moron!
Why was Mathysson offended by a picture of a lady in a bikini, but not upset by nudity on the streets in TO?
She attended the Gay Parade.
He will never sue. He will suck up the insult.
It’s what men do.
These are the same people who want to legalize prostitution.
“Moore, get yourself a good tort lawyer and sue her. Make her squirm for a while, then let her off the hook when you have your satisfaction.”
Posted by: Shamrock at December 6, 2007 12:07 PM
She should only be let off the hook if she agrees to wear duct tape over her mouth for the next two years. And that Redman dolt as well.
She has no problem tying this in with the Montreal massacre, yet her party actively supports abortion. I wonder how many females are aborted every year in Canada? 50,000? More?
Commie aholes.
I live in the riding next to James Moore’s. I’m actually kind of pleased to hear that he’s got a girlfriend, if you know what I mean. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Last election my own riding narrowly elected an NDP member. Dawn Black is, to borrow Mark Steyn’s phrasing, so dumb she has to take off her pantyhose to count to 12. I don’t know Irene Matthyssen, but being familiar with other NDP hacks, I know the type. Moore should sue her. Media will play down this story, so the lawsuit would bring it the attention it deserves. He was obviously just going through his e-mail, and the girlfriend attached a picture of herself that popped up. Anybody’s who’s attended sessions of a legislature knows that the places drone on for hours. At least Moore’s got a laptop and can operate it. That’s probably more than can said for much of the NDP caucus.
angry in the great white north has a great column on this situation.
He suggests
“I call for Irene Mathyssen to be sent to attend gender sensitivity training. During the training, she will be asked to learn that not all men are slavering dogs, and that all men deserve the benefit of the doubt. Men deserve to have the opportunity to explain their actions first, to face their accusers, and to be considered innocent until the preponderence of evidence proves otherwise.
She must learn that public humiliation is not the way we deal with an issue like this before the facts are known.
Indeed, she must learn that her own sense of righteous indignation is not a substitute for those facts that she seemed disinclined to seek out first.
When Irene Mathyssen learns to treat men as individuals deserving respect and consideration, then her apologies will mean something. As it is, it seems that Irene Mathyssen objectifies men, assuming all of them to be dumb rutting animals.”
Heh. Perfect.
PM made a reference to this in the house today & noted the liberal whip apologized & he noted the NDP Mouth was not in the house today, Moore said she called him & apologized he accepted this & expects her to apologize to the house. Then he got a standing ovation & the NDP behind him even stood( of course they would nation was watching & waiting)
Kate: “Update – It’s been a good week for the NDP.”
Has Taliban Jack resurfaced from under his burka yet?
See the NDP had to appologies AGAIN because of a smear campaine carried out against Liberal Dave Oliver, in last election. LIED about trying to bribe a NDP canidate. The NDP seem to think that they have the right to smear anyone they want. Under Layton they have become nothing but a group of harpies. I emailed MP Moore and encouraged him to sue Mathyssen.
Maybe now is the time for Taliban Jack to make that scouting trip to Afghanistan to “dialog” with the Innocent Blood of Islam and get to the “root causes” of their perceived oppression.
Nice to see the NDP admit to being duplicitous skanks and have to be abjectly apologetic twice. Shouldn’t this come in threes?
Did they apologize for saying our troops were worse than the terrorists?
Does anyone who is posting here know that it is a bikini-clad female? Because if not, you’re perpetuating it as much as any of the news outlets.
I’m just grateful it wasn’t one of the loony rednecks left over from the Refoooorrrrm Party seeing something objectionable on a NDP laptop. As it is, it’s only a loony professional female educator with an axe to grind.
Ah The House of Clowns, the most overpaid comedy network on TV. Bet Rick Mercer’s pissed he couldn’t come up with anything like this and the Schreiber laugh in. The networks must be pleased though they get this stupididty for free.
Over at angry in the great white north he shows the seating arrangement in the house. If she saw the screen from there she must have eyesight better than any fighter pilot which leads you to believe she was creeping around like a whore in a brothel and spying on people.
I saw the Global National report by Tara Nelson on this last night, 5:30 PM out here on the wet coast. The entire report was about how the Conservative MP was caught surfing porn in the HOC, even though it was already out that the allegation was bogus.
I e-mailed Global National immediately after the broadcast and requested them to broadcast a retraction and apology first item on tonights newscast not bury it somewhere at the end. Well guess what, I watched the entire broadcast and not a peep of a retraction or apology. I guess Global National has to be added to the CBC, CTV, Red Star et all as part of the disgraceful reporting on the MSM.
They have now lost one more viewer as I will never watch thier newscast again.
What a sad bunch of twits and dried up old prunes! And they call this “Leadership”!
Richard Ball: “These are the same people who want to legalize prostitution.”
What part of Canada do you live in? Prostitution is legal in this country; you just can’t do it from the safety of your home. Outcall “escort” services abound in every major Canadian city. So long as you don’t look for business on public streets (“public solicitation” is illegal), conduct your negotiations over the phone, and travel to your client’s home or hotel room, you can charge people to have sex with you.
You can even advertise in the papers. The Toronto Sun carries ads for “escorts”, and “eye magazine”, which is owned by the Toronto Star, runs 3-4 pages of escort advertising, accompanied by full colour photos of very scantily clad women. I’m not even going to mention Internet ads, which are even more salacious.
An American I met golfing a few years ago admitted to me that the reason he was visiting Toronto was that, by following these rules, he could fool around with some girls and not risk a criminal record. He also noted with the strong US dollar (at the time) and apparently low Canadian rates compared to Nevada (AFAIK, the only place prostitution is legal in the US), he got much more mileage, so to speak, for his buck.
Geez, maybe I should have entered this into the Post’s new motto for Canada contest:
“Canada: Sex tourism and loving it!”
Sue Mathyssen, the CBC and the Globe & Mail for millions.
Force them into sensitivity training to understand their bigotry against white male Christians.
Donate the money to a just conservative cause.
Everyone knows the name of Mathyssen. She has been held up to shame for spouting off accusations, as it should be.
Hardly anyone (except SDA regulars, apparently) knows the name of the Liberal MP who stood in parliament with even less of a factual basis and freely made the same sort of defamations.
This is starting to look like the Liberal partisans at the MSM will use the tempest to take down both their rivals.
I do like the sensitivity training idea, only make it optional for Redman (since she only spoke under house immunity.) Then issue daily press releases on the latest speculations of whether she will or won’t attend.
http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/News/National/2007/12/07/4712365-sun.html
Irene has no intention of apologizing, she is the victim in all of this.
Moore was smart he would sue her. Females making false allegations, and getting away with it, makes all females look vicious and manipulative.
As long as there is immunity in the house, this kind of nonsense will continue.
When TV cameras were allowed in the house in 1977, the immunity rule should have been done away with.
When proceedings are on national TV, what is the difference if allegations were made outside the house or in it?
right, honey pot. Mathyssen now has no intention of apologizing. See Steve Janke’s comment http://stevejanke.com/
Mathyssen now plans to only state, in the House, that she ought to have commented first to Moore, before her House comments and her public press declarations of ‘horror’. But, she maintains her accusations against him – of viewing ‘soft porn’, ie, his girlfriend in her swimsuit and his dog, at a beach.
Redman, the Liberal feminist who rose to support Mathyssen in her accusations, remains silent.
The self-righteous, smugness, and the petty maliciciousness of the Opposition members in the House is becoming unreal.
I think this is a crappy apology. http://tinyurl.com/2zxj2c
The only thing she apologized for was in not talking to James Moore, first, before rising in the house. Does that mean she feels free to rise again under the same circumstances as long as she speaks to the member first?
She should have apologized for being a nasty, suspicious busybody.
I guess though that is the nature of the beast whereby we belong to some kind of communally managed system so that everybody is entitled to know everybody else’s business, only for the good of the community, mind you.
Mathyssen*s distortional reach from what could have been a Victoria Secret ad to the slaying of women in a Quebec University shows such a wild lack of logic it should disqualify her from office.
Even those who *never watch television* realize that every second advert features a scantily clad woman. = TG
Dipper lady should be sued. Sure, there’s an apology now, but in a few years it’ll enter the public mythology as “that tory that was surfing porn” and the left will repeat it endlessly. Any settlement can go to charity.
This is the angle that should bring her down: she is violating the privacy of Moore. I thought the NDP was a Chump-ion of privacy rights? What is she doing invading his cyber-bedroom anyway? I thought the government has no place in Canadians bedrooms. Too many double standards here.
The real kicker to me in all of this is that for years we’ve been admonished by feminists, male and female, that politics must become more even handed; that once there are more women in the house, it will regain some decorum. Indeed Dion is still prattling on about his plan for male/female electoral equalization.
If this is what happens when we have a stronger cadre of women in the house I would hate to see a 50/50 split. If we then elect a bunch of “church lady” type busybodies who have nothing better to do but become offended on behalf of women everywhere whenever some man says or does something that hurts their little female feelings, I think I’d rather stick with the old boy rule. Now that I think about it, Dion kind of resembles the “church lady”.
To gain some semblance of credibility as full play elected officials as opposed to single track nincompoops, they ought to turn down dial on the misogynist-seeking missiles just a tad.
“I thought the NDP was a Chump-ion of privacy rights?”
Well I guess you made my point for me Doug…the Dips really don’t know what they stand for…they only know what they are against and their cranky detached value system has them bearing a grudge against just about everything and everybody.
As they sit now I wouldn’t be shocked to see them ban “fun”…to this latest gen of Dips anything that people do that gives them pleasure probably is at odds with some tenet of misanthropic Dip philosphy.
If he were to look at pictures Sven Robertson in the gay calender it would have been okay.
That’s on of the “intellectual” followers of Tommy Douglas you saw there. In any event, why was she spying on another member’s screen? And we thought Stephane Dion was a moron!
Why was Mathysson offended by a picture of a lady in a bikini, but not upset by nudity on the streets in TO?
She attended the Gay Parade.
He will never sue. He will suck up the insult.
It’s what men do.
These are the same people who want to legalize prostitution.
“Moore, get yourself a good tort lawyer and sue her. Make her squirm for a while, then let her off the hook when you have your satisfaction.”
Posted by: Shamrock at December 6, 2007 12:07 PM
She should only be let off the hook if she agrees to wear duct tape over her mouth for the next two years. And that Redman dolt as well.
She has no problem tying this in with the Montreal massacre, yet her party actively supports abortion. I wonder how many females are aborted every year in Canada? 50,000? More?
Commie aholes.
I live in the riding next to James Moore’s. I’m actually kind of pleased to hear that he’s got a girlfriend, if you know what I mean. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Last election my own riding narrowly elected an NDP member. Dawn Black is, to borrow Mark Steyn’s phrasing, so dumb she has to take off her pantyhose to count to 12. I don’t know Irene Matthyssen, but being familiar with other NDP hacks, I know the type. Moore should sue her. Media will play down this story, so the lawsuit would bring it the attention it deserves. He was obviously just going through his e-mail, and the girlfriend attached a picture of herself that popped up. Anybody’s who’s attended sessions of a legislature knows that the places drone on for hours. At least Moore’s got a laptop and can operate it. That’s probably more than can said for much of the NDP caucus.
angry in the great white north has a great column on this situation.
He suggests
“I call for Irene Mathyssen to be sent to attend gender sensitivity training. During the training, she will be asked to learn that not all men are slavering dogs, and that all men deserve the benefit of the doubt. Men deserve to have the opportunity to explain their actions first, to face their accusers, and to be considered innocent until the preponderence of evidence proves otherwise.
She must learn that public humiliation is not the way we deal with an issue like this before the facts are known.
Indeed, she must learn that her own sense of righteous indignation is not a substitute for those facts that she seemed disinclined to seek out first.
When Irene Mathyssen learns to treat men as individuals deserving respect and consideration, then her apologies will mean something. As it is, it seems that Irene Mathyssen objectifies men, assuming all of them to be dumb rutting animals.”
Heh. Perfect.
PM made a reference to this in the house today & noted the liberal whip apologized & he noted the NDP Mouth was not in the house today, Moore said she called him & apologized he accepted this & expects her to apologize to the house. Then he got a standing ovation & the NDP behind him even stood( of course they would nation was watching & waiting)
Kate: “Update – It’s been a good week for the NDP.”
Has Taliban Jack resurfaced from under his burka yet?
See the NDP had to appologies AGAIN because of a smear campaine carried out against Liberal Dave Oliver, in last election. LIED about trying to bribe a NDP canidate. The NDP seem to think that they have the right to smear anyone they want. Under Layton they have become nothing but a group of harpies. I emailed MP Moore and encouraged him to sue Mathyssen.
Maybe now is the time for Taliban Jack to make that scouting trip to Afghanistan to “dialog” with the Innocent Blood of Islam and get to the “root causes” of their perceived oppression.
Nice to see the NDP admit to being duplicitous skanks and have to be abjectly apologetic twice. Shouldn’t this come in threes?
Did they apologize for saying our troops were worse than the terrorists?
Does anyone who is posting here know that it is a bikini-clad female? Because if not, you’re perpetuating it as much as any of the news outlets.
I’m just grateful it wasn’t one of the loony rednecks left over from the Refoooorrrrm Party seeing something objectionable on a NDP laptop. As it is, it’s only a loony professional female educator with an axe to grind.
Ah The House of Clowns, the most overpaid comedy network on TV. Bet Rick Mercer’s pissed he couldn’t come up with anything like this and the Schreiber laugh in. The networks must be pleased though they get this stupididty for free.
Over at angry in the great white north he shows the seating arrangement in the house. If she saw the screen from there she must have eyesight better than any fighter pilot which leads you to believe she was creeping around like a whore in a brothel and spying on people.
I saw the Global National report by Tara Nelson on this last night, 5:30 PM out here on the wet coast. The entire report was about how the Conservative MP was caught surfing porn in the HOC, even though it was already out that the allegation was bogus.
I e-mailed Global National immediately after the broadcast and requested them to broadcast a retraction and apology first item on tonights newscast not bury it somewhere at the end. Well guess what, I watched the entire broadcast and not a peep of a retraction or apology. I guess Global National has to be added to the CBC, CTV, Red Star et all as part of the disgraceful reporting on the MSM.
They have now lost one more viewer as I will never watch thier newscast again.
What a sad bunch of twits and dried up old prunes! And they call this “Leadership”!
Richard Ball: “These are the same people who want to legalize prostitution.”
What part of Canada do you live in? Prostitution is legal in this country; you just can’t do it from the safety of your home. Outcall “escort” services abound in every major Canadian city. So long as you don’t look for business on public streets (“public solicitation” is illegal), conduct your negotiations over the phone, and travel to your client’s home or hotel room, you can charge people to have sex with you.
You can even advertise in the papers. The Toronto Sun carries ads for “escorts”, and “eye magazine”, which is owned by the Toronto Star, runs 3-4 pages of escort advertising, accompanied by full colour photos of very scantily clad women. I’m not even going to mention Internet ads, which are even more salacious.
An American I met golfing a few years ago admitted to me that the reason he was visiting Toronto was that, by following these rules, he could fool around with some girls and not risk a criminal record. He also noted with the strong US dollar (at the time) and apparently low Canadian rates compared to Nevada (AFAIK, the only place prostitution is legal in the US), he got much more mileage, so to speak, for his buck.
Geez, maybe I should have entered this into the Post’s new motto for Canada contest:
“Canada: Sex tourism and loving it!”
Sue Mathyssen, the CBC and the Globe & Mail for millions.
Force them into sensitivity training to understand their bigotry against white male Christians.
Donate the money to a just conservative cause.
Everyone knows the name of Mathyssen. She has been held up to shame for spouting off accusations, as it should be.
Hardly anyone (except SDA regulars, apparently) knows the name of the Liberal MP who stood in parliament with even less of a factual basis and freely made the same sort of defamations.
This is starting to look like the Liberal partisans at the MSM will use the tempest to take down both their rivals.
I do like the sensitivity training idea, only make it optional for Redman (since she only spoke under house immunity.) Then issue daily press releases on the latest speculations of whether she will or won’t attend.
http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/News/National/2007/12/07/4712365-sun.html
Irene has no intention of apologizing, she is the victim in all of this.
Moore was smart he would sue her. Females making false allegations, and getting away with it, makes all females look vicious and manipulative.
As long as there is immunity in the house, this kind of nonsense will continue.
When TV cameras were allowed in the house in 1977, the immunity rule should have been done away with.
When proceedings are on national TV, what is the difference if allegations were made outside the house or in it?
right, honey pot. Mathyssen now has no intention of apologizing. See Steve Janke’s comment
http://stevejanke.com/
Mathyssen now plans to only state, in the House, that she ought to have commented first to Moore, before her House comments and her public press declarations of ‘horror’. But, she maintains her accusations against him – of viewing ‘soft porn’, ie, his girlfriend in her swimsuit and his dog, at a beach.
Redman, the Liberal feminist who rose to support Mathyssen in her accusations, remains silent.
The self-righteous, smugness, and the petty maliciciousness of the Opposition members in the House is becoming unreal.
I think this is a crappy apology.
http://tinyurl.com/2zxj2c
The only thing she apologized for was in not talking to James Moore, first, before rising in the house. Does that mean she feels free to rise again under the same circumstances as long as she speaks to the member first?
She should have apologized for being a nasty, suspicious busybody.
I guess though that is the nature of the beast whereby we belong to some kind of communally managed system so that everybody is entitled to know everybody else’s business, only for the good of the community, mind you.