One Flu Out Of The Wuhan Nest

“How’s your computer?”

On April 26th, I directed you to a lengthy Medium article titled Lab-Made? SARS-CoV-2 Genealogy Through the Lens of Gain-of-Function Research and have been following the story through Deigin’s twitter account.

If you didn’t read it the first time around, I recommend you set an hour aside because the case he made is gaining support with every passing week.

Yuri Diegin was interviewed today by Bret Weinstein on Darkhorse. It gets off to a bit of a shaky start. Deigin is Russian, with the natural reluctance of Russians to venture into controversy, but he loosens up as the interview develops. Stick with it through the technical discussions, it’s not that difficult and the conversation moves on to the broader implications of what has been going on in virology research labs, along with efforts to suppress the increasing number of hands going up, saying “hey, wait a second…”

The video begins a the 42 minute mark to picque interest, but I recommend you watch from the beginning.

I’ll repost the inteview on Saturday for those who find it difficult to make time on weekdays.

15 Replies to “One Flu Out Of The Wuhan Nest”

  1. I strongly suggest people listen to this podcast — Brian Whitmore now from CEPA and formerly RFE/RL in his PowerVertical Podcast. This is a Russian tactic that goes back 40 years.

    KREMLIN PATHOGENS
    The Power Vertical Podcast at CEPA
    https://www.cepa.org/kremlin-pathogens
    Brian Whitmore
    5 June 2020

    A Kremlin-sponsored disinformation campaign claims that a new deadly virus is actually a biological weapon developed in a secret U.S. laboratory. Is it 1983? Or is it 2020?

    Actually, it’s both. Because when it comes to Russian active measures, the more things change, the more they stay the same. From the HIV-AIDS to the anti-vaxxer movement to the covid-19 crisis, false narratives about public health issues have long been a key vector of Russian disinformation and malign influence operations.

    So what do Kremlin campaigns of the past teach us about what we are facing today?

    Listen to the Power Vertical Podcast as Brian Whitmore, Donald N. Jensen, and special guest John Sipher untangle the latest from Moscow.

  2. The virus is a natural virus but it has six “inserts”. It also arrived on the scene “pre-evolved” to infect humans by multiple receptors. SARS1 evolved over time but SARS2 did not. It just arrived as is. Well explained for lay people here. Of interest one modification allows the virus to bind to the bitter/sweet receptors explaining why the sense of smell vanishes in some people.
    https://bgr.com/2020/06/04/coronavirus-origin-wuhan-lab-patient-zero-china-accident/

    The original peer reviewed (for what that is worth) publication outing this is found here: Sørensen, B., Susrud, A. and Dalgleish, A.G. (2020) Biovacc-19: A candidate vaccine for Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) developed from analysis of its general method of action for infectivity. Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery. https://immunor.com/biovacc-19-a-candidate-vaccine-for-covid-19-sars-cov-2-accepted-by-qrb-discovery/

    They reportedly could not get it published without removing any and all references to China making artificial modifications to the virus. This is also a rather obscure journal meaning no main stream big journal would touch it.

    That scientific article is rather thick with jargon but if you have any genetics/molecular biology background you can see this virus smells bad. It is a natural virus that does naturally infect humans if they are handling bats or working where bats are (mining in caves where bats live for example) but does not naturally get transmitted between humans. It appears to have been tinkered with through the insertion of six inserts to produce greater virulence against humans and allow transmission between humans as well to to allow the virus to bind to more than one receptor. The lack of evolution can be explained in only one of two ways. It has been floating around in humans undetected for a long time, long enough to acquire the six inserts through normal viral evolution, all of which are indentical to recently published sequences in the literature associated with increased virulence in other viruses. Alternatively it was deliberately tinkered with using information from the scientific literature. Now there are legitimate reasons to tinker with viruses in order to find cures and vaccines. However, like nuclear science, it could also be done to create weapons of mass destruction.

    My opinion on this virus has changed to it is a natural virus with a natural sequence modified six times to make it more virulent and to allow human to human transmission. The modifications were done in a lab not in nature. The Chinese weren’t done yet and the virus got out prematurely by an accident. It has worked out rather well for them so we can expect many more such viruses to appear once they have perfected their technique. That is my current opinion and subject to change as more information comes out. Your mileage may vary.

  3. Drone every single Chinese lab. Blacklist and sanction any scientist or manager associated with them. Cease all academic contacts.

    1. I agree with that. There has been this naive academic approach of assuming the best of the Chinese Communists while taking their money and resources to continue the pet projects of the academics in virology. I would also not accept any Chinese vaccine. Some failed vaccines for MERS and SARS1 not only failed but the antibodies altered the viral shape on binding to make the virus even better able to bind and therefore even more virulent! Since the Chinese Communists are proven liars and totally unscrupulous, I would not put it past them to provide the west with a vaccine that makes things worse not better. I am personally horrified Canada is testing and will produce if successful a Communist Chinese vaccine via Can-Sino which is part of the Chinese military. They say the virus has already been tested on humans. Which humans?

      1. Drone is the wrong answer. It just smashes stuff up, potentially allowing Ben more of whatever is stored there to escape. The only answer if they won’t voluntarily destroy it is nuclear fire.

  4. What I’m taking away is that the continued existence of the world’s human population is contingent upon research labs in China, the US, Switzerland, and God knows where else, keep their places free of fanatics, fools, sociopaths, and arseholes.

    Talk about stretching faith.

    1. Yes. Think of the issues with plutonium. We do need to stay on top of virus research simply because we know the enemy is doing it (and so is Mother Nature) and we can’t let them win this race. Imagine if the scientists of the Manhattan project were inviting German and Japanese scientists in to share information and brainstorm, trusting those scientists to be ethical because, well, they are fellow scientists. And that’s exactly what we have been doing with virus research. It is just plain suicidal.

        1. Look at some of the other names at the top of the article.

          David Greenglass was Ethel Rosenberg’s brother and was a U. S. Army machinist at Los Alamos. He spilled the beans on her.

          Ted Hall was a physicist, also at Los Alamos. His motive was that the U. S. shouldn’t have a monopoly on the bomb. Many of his scientific colleagues would have been delighted if he’d been convicted and executed.

  5. It was man “handled”. No Question.
    I simply will not entertain that this weird Virus is a naturally occuring organism.
    In its current capacity – form, It came from CHINA.. that in itself is damning enough….NO.?? Particularly given it came from Hubei Province…?? and not Guandong. Hubei where they have 2 labs working on viruses…?? With Scientists who have scoured every bat infested Cave for decades…?? With Scientists (Shi Zhengli et all), who have published papers on Synthetic altered Bat Coronaviruses Designed to infect Humans..?? In a Country that makes Hitler !944 Germany look absolutely BENIGN in comparison…??

    And I’m to believe this is a “naturally occurring” organism…??
    Ha ha Ha ha…AS IF..!!
    I Won’t even begin to tell ya what I think about a Vaccine made by China coming here….LMAO.

    We are TALKING bout the most Ruthless Country on the planet – one that has ZERO compunction to harvest ORGANS from LIVE Prisoners – think about that kind of mentality…?? and then to tell me they would “NEVER” let an organism out or even create such a thing in their Maniacal Quest for WORLD Domination…??? nahhhh.

  6. Was it Einstein who said, if you can’t explain a subject simply, that you do not know the subject well enough?

  7. Those James Bond movies about evil, demented criminals may come true after all. Step right up George Soros.

  8. So has this “Unstable corona virus” mutated yet?
    We were told that one of the characteristics of these viruses was that they tend to mutate very quickly and this could save us or kill us,but that was one of the reasons vaccines were so hard to make.
    Yet apparently this thing is remarkably stable.
    Or has its mutation gone unreported in the mass demonstrations of how to riot your way to the cure?

Navigation