58 Replies to “Do You Tink It’s Izzy To Wear A Chicken Zuit In Parliament?”

  2. I thought that the Clown Party had ideas about getting rid of the RAG Party {Red [LIEberal] And Green Party} This is something that I never thought of. I think the LIEberals will use the insane angle to get rid of DeYawn.
    All I have to say is ” …. bring on the election with the LIEberals and DeYawn as their leader, before they realize that DeYawn is crazy and giving clowns a bad name.”

  4. Ian Brodie should resign for damaging our relations with the US.
    Your secretive pal, Steve Harper, should tell Canadians what his party offered to CAdman for his vote. What did HArper mean when he said “financial considerations”. You must be very disappointed with your leader. HE’s crooked and a liar.
    BTW, when is the Mulroney Schrieber inquiry going to start? WHat is taking Mr. Decisve so long? What the hell is he hiding now?

  5. When the inquiry is called, what if it goes all the way back to Chretain and reopens the Sponsorship scandal. What if charges are allowed to be laid. What if this also backfires on liberals.
    And, what if PMSH supports Dions motion, or abstains. Would the government fall, or would the bloc and ndp have to leave the HofC.
    Paul Martin is responsible for all the mess. He should never have called an election with 18 mos left in his mandate. He did have a majority at the time.
    Just think, Dion would never have become leader, and honest government would still be waiting in the wings with the conservatives.

  6. aa,
    Just like all those liberals who made all of those anti-American statements resigned?
    Chretien, Martin included. and lets not forget that shrill harpie who said “Americans, I hate those bastards!”
    Yes, to recall all of those people who sadly had to resign for the greater good… er… well… never mind then.
    Leftards are too stupid.

  7. This is a joke, right?
    I remember a couple years ago shortly after Mr. Dion was elected the Liberal leader, people/media talking about how he may not be a dynamic personality but he was very “intellectual”.
    Oops, I guess I told another funny….

  10. The only possible strategy that I can come up with is that Dion is trying the make the NDP and BQ look as weak an ineffectual as the LPC.
    A possible foreshadowing of the next election? Will Dion will give up any attempt at wooing fiscal conservatives or blue liberals and instead fight for survival with other progressives. A four way battle for social and environmental justice between the LPC,BQ,NDP and Greens.
    Of course, all the progressives will attack the CPC as scary and regressive but they will only be preaching to the choir. Meanwhile the CPC continues to make converts of traditional LPC voters in the big city suburbs. The over taxed, pragmatic families that want practical and economical progress on the environment and poverty issues.

  11. I hope Liberal voters with a conscience and at least a dash of reason will vote no confidence in this new bunch of criminals.
    They are not serving the voters that they are contractually obligated to serve.
    At the passing of the most important bill, the budget, 83 of them did not show up in parliament. This is nothing less than abrogation of duty and responsibility to the people that placed trust in them.
    This is, by no other description, a criminal and fraudulent act.

  12. This of course is a direct consequence of employment equity in the Liberal Party.
    30 years ago Pierre Trudeau had no shortage of goofy MPs in his caucus with goofy ideas. What he had that Stephane Dion doesn’t have, however, is a cadre of men – portly men in three piece suits with combovers, back hair, IQs in excess of 150, and a demonstrated record of winning elections – to shoot down the truly idiotic ideas and put the goofy MPs in their place.
    Regrettably for Dion, any idea put forth by an employment equity MP or apparatchik is going to meet little if any resistance, lest Dion or his handlers be accused of being non-“progressive”.
    30 years ago Keith Davey or Jim Coutts or a random Axworthy would’ve shot a motion this nonsensical down before it gained any traction, guaranteed.
    What has changed since then? A fundamental, systemic, and institutional hatred of white males among traditional Liberal supporters, for starters.

  13. Thanks Kate and Steve for the first early morning belly-laugh I’ve had in years.
    This is real evidence that the “natural governing” Liberal Party of Canada has become quite unnatural and odd to say the least. I suppose that is to be expected when you have have two university professors at the top running what amounts to a freak show.
    The Liberal bullies Steven (all that’s missing is a cape) Harper and decided to go beat up on a couple smaller chumps. The Liberals are completely and utterly out of gas. They are reduced to standing out in the rain throwing mud pies around the play ground.

  14. I’m assuming that there IS a Liberal strategy. In another thread, I posted what I’ll call Strategy One – Propaganda. Apologies for partial repeat.
    Remember, the Liberals have no policies; they don’t govern via policies; they govern via manipulation. When in power, they use taxpayer money to buy votes from special interest groups.
    When not in power, they use someone else’s money. The taxpayer funded CBC and their buddies in the MSM.
    I think that the current Liberal strategy of a Return to Power is to find, create, set up – whatever – a MSM-spread scenario about the CPC and Harper as ‘corrupt’. The fact that it isn’t, is not relevant.
    You can see, from aa’s post above, how this is successful among the easily-manipulated section of the population. He’s fallen for it all.
    So- they’ve tried with Mulroney-Schreiber. Their agenda was to link Schreiber/Mulroney to Harper.
    Harper’s response to their strategy was to move it out of their hands and into an official inquiry. The Liberals aren’t interested in this. Their basic agenda is not the truth but a deliberate campaign of foul propaganda.
    Then, they’ve moved into Cadman. That’s another campaign based on hearsay, misinformation and speculation. To befoul Harper and the CPC. Harper’s response – to move it out of the hands of Liberal manipulation and propaganda and into an official inquiry – a libel suit in court. The Liberals aren’t interested in such an inquiry.
    Now, they’re into ‘Obama’. The same agenda – befoul Harper. Harper’s immediate response; again, move it out of the Liberal hands of manipulation and propaganda into an official inquiry.
    What’s next? The Liberal strategy is clear. Find, create and set up situations that can be used, via the MSM and blatant misinformation and lies, to denigrate the CPC and Harper.
    Harper’s tactic to deflect this propaganda is to move it out of their hands and into a venue that is focused on facts and truth – into official inquiries or the courts.
    The Liberals aren’t interested in the truth; their sole agenda is corruption of the truth in their focus on Returning to Power.
    They use their status in the House where they can say ANYTHING, no matter how defamatory, no matter how untrue – and where they are not held accountable, they are not required to prove their allegations. These lies then get reported to the public by the MSM! Neat strategy. The Liberals get away with pure defamation and are not held accountable for this behaviour.
    Strategy Two against the NDP is also pure manipulation and propaganda. They are trying to denigrate these two parties, the NDP in particular, as collaborators-in-corruption. The NDP are fighting with the Liberals for votes; the Liberal strategy is not, of course, to appeal to the voters with policies. Heh. Liberals don’t ‘do’ policies. They simply buy votes. This is yet another strategy, assuming that the electorate are ‘beer and popcorn’ dumb and can be manipulated into submission.
    That’s The Liberal Way.

  15. ET, you’ve hit the nail on the head. I’ve got to copy that post for my files. Excellent analysis.

  16. “The motion slams the Harper government for setting back women’s equality rights by cancelling such Liberal measures as the Court Challenges Program and a national child care program.”
    A better Liberal solution would be to continue facilitating the Invasion of Islam on Canadian society thus bringing about the eventual Sharia law that will help these same women exponentially!

  17. Oh please God, may Stephane Dion remain the leading clown of the LIEberals as long as he is alive!

  18. If the MSM has any remaining credibility, it should declard that the Liberal opposition, in theory the government-in-waiting, is unfit to govern.
    As ET points out, it’s all smear and fear while abstaining from presenting any viable alternative or policy direction.
    The Libs have turned Question Period into a gong show.

  19. Check out todays editorial in the National Post…they really give it to Dion and the Liberals regarding their no show.

  20. “Do You Tink It’s Izzy To Wear A Chicken Zuit In Parliament”
    Muzz bee hey…at least has izzy as stee-ling da izzy munnies frum da hal-ber-ta hoil patches hey?

  21. fsafasfast asks What has changed since then?
    What has changed in the LPC is that the FLL has infiltrated them with the hopes of merging the 2 parties in the near future to stop the tide of the Dreaded Far Right Neo-Con Republican George Bush hatefull bullying style of PMSH & the Conservatives.
    Is Socialism on the rise in Canada? You can bet your ass it is, Just look at the Hoc in the last 15yrs(yah yah we all know it started earlier)But it has become more ramped with the disappearance of the Tough strong handed libs that were in charge only to be replaced by who? None other then FLL(Far looney left,NDP)that want & believe in nothing but a Canada viewed through Rose Colored Glasses & they are feeling more threatened every day as more & more Canadians are saying Enough is Enough. Closer to the Centre Left libs have been crossing over to the Right & do you blame them Just look at their leader. They want a Strong leader like Stephen Harper & a direction for this country that is more intuned to their family values. Not a weak leader that abstains on anything & everything in the HOC just to survive, Yet is critical outside the HOC of anything that is a threat to his Idealogy ways of a Socialist Society.

  22. Truly on of the silliest tactics yet.
    What SD and co. should do is vote against some of these pieces of legislation and force the BQ or the ND to go running out the hall in order to avoid an election. Both of those parties would be routed if an election were to be called and it will take all three to bring down the gov’t.
    This practice of always being the goat/clown that makes up silly/lame excuses for not voting is just plain dumb.

  23. Stephane Dion is to the Liberal Party of Canada what Patrick Lalime was to the Ottawa Senators (remember Joe Nieuwendyk’s goals in game 7 in 2004?).
    Or as Ray Emery currently is to the Ottawa Senators…

  24. This is just a supposition.
    Let’s assume that the two unidentified Cadman visiters were indeed operatives from another party who were actually setting him up. They say that they’re Conservatives and they offer him a bribe of a million dollar insurance policy.
    If he accepts and votes against the government the Liberals cry foul and news of the bribe is leaked to CBC and the Globe. Martin refuses to admit defeat and an investigation ensues with all fingers pointing at the Conservatives.
    If Cadman votes with the government then the matter is promptly forgotten and nothing is on record so Cadman has no proof of anything.
    Instead, Cadman gets angry and throws the operatives out of his office and, still believing that they’re lower echelon Conservatives, tells his wife about the clumsy and insulting attempt to buy his vote.
    He votes with the government so the whole episode is quietly stored by the operatives and their political masters but not forgotten.
    A few years later, after numerous unsuccessful attempts to mire the Conservatives in scandals, the Liberals need intense media attention and general derision to be deflected considering their abysmal performance in the House of Commons.
    Why did Paul Martin write the preface to the Cadman book when Chuck was a Conservative and his wife is a Conservative candidate?
    Why turn to a Liberal to write the preface when the Liberals fought Cadman tooth and nail on every amendment he brought forward?
    Why did the Liberal Party sit on this information for a year before bringing it forward?
    Who were the two unidentified men at the meeting the books author still claims happened but not on May 17th?
    Why is there no record of a meeting with them?
    NeilD

  25. The Liberals appear to have caught a case of Hugh McFayden’s disease. Manitoba’s hapless Tory leader blundered through a recent provincial election with no clear policy ideas other than a bizarre proposal to use tax dollars to bring back the Winnipeg Jets. The result was another humiliating loss of Tory seats.
    Like the Manitoba Tories, the federal Liberals’ only tack is to oppose whatever it is that the government does. Presently, they are berating the rest of the opposition for past opposition that was done in what the Liberals believe to be an untimely manner. Just when I think Dion must have peaked in the stupid gimmicks competition, he proves me wrong yet again.
    Over and over, Dion has conceded the field of ideas (i.e. policy) to the Tories. As a result, the Liberals’ activities in the HOC consist solely of trying to bang the drum about alleged ethical breaches by the Harper Tories. That drum is starting to sound awfully dull.
    They’ll pay for this nonsense at election time. Just like Hugh McFayden.

  26. This motion demonstrates the deep-seated belief among Liberals that they are entitled to run the country. They condemn the other opposition parties for an “irresponsible motion” that led to a government that is not Liberal. Apparently it was irresponsible to do anything that might lead to a non-Liberal government. They forget that this is a democracy, and the non-liberal government is in place because the people of Canada elected them. The antics of the Liberals in parliament show that they have an utter disrespect for parliament, and this latest motion shows that they also have contempt for democracy itself.

  27. “Or as Ray Emery currently is to the Ottawa Senators…”
    Speaking of employment equity, lol. It is difficult to take the Senators seriously when they so obviously cater to their employment equity players to the gross detriment of the team.
    An entire city, broadcast industry, and fanbase has been afraid to criticize a half-black man for two years and now the Senators and their fans are paying the price for it by sucking large.
    I think the LPC women’s caucus is the Ray Emery in this scenario, and Dion is the well-meaning/close-to-retirement baby boomer careerist coach (Murray, Paddock) who doesn’t want to end his career on a politically incorrect note.

  28. I’m accepting as reasonably valid that the current Liberal strategy of Returning to Power is via propaganda. They are not offering policies or good governance. They are instead operating in Their Way, which is via manipulation and propaganda.
    As Opposition, they are a total failure. The duty of an Opposition is, not to mechanically oppose but to critique, analyze and debate. That will sometimes lead to approval of gov’t policy, sometimes to suggestions for change, sometimes to absolute rejection. That’s what they are paid to do.
    The Liberals have no interest in policies, either when they were in power or in Opposition. Their interest is Being In Power/Returning to Power.
    What I find disturbing in their current strategy, which is to find, create, set up scenarios to befoul and besmirch BOTH the Conservative Party and Stephen Harper – is that their tactics are pure propaganda. There is no interest in truth.
    They are assisted in this strategy by their alliance with the MSM, which includes both the taxpayer funded CBC, as well as other MSM such as CTV, and the majority of political opinion voices in the MSM.
    BUT – they are assisted, in the most serious sense by a Fault Line in our Parliament. This Fault Line is the fact that you can say ANYTHING at all in the House of Commons. Any lie, any allegation, you can accuse anyone of anything, make the most foul assertions against anyone – and are not held responsible for your open defamation and lies. What you say in the House is immune to and outside of the Law.
    This is a violation of our right, and the includes MPs rights, against defamation, against vicious and invalid accusations.
    In the old era, when there was no television, no MSM rabidly reporting everything that is said in the House…such accusations were not made public.
    But today, these lies and defamations are instantly public knowledge. That’s right – knowledge. They are received as FACTS, as valid information. The public believes them; the public expands on these allegations (where’s there’s smoke there’s fire) and believes them.
    The question period in the House, filled with false and defamatory accusations, are broadcast live to the public. The MSM gleefully repeats and rebroadcasts them. Again and again. Watch clips repeated on Duffy, on Newman, on the news.
    Read them repeated in Taber, Galloway, Weston, Travis and so on.
    So, the Liberal strategy of openly defaming and libeling the Conservative govt and Harper (without costing them a cent)…AND NOT BEING HELD accountable for these accusations – works. It works because the Liberals say these things in the House of Commons, where such accusations are immune from any requirements for proof.
    So- if I were an MP, I could stand up in the House and accuse some other MP of the most vile and vicious acts. This would instantly be reported to the public as ‘Information about So and So’. I wouldn’t be liable to come up with any evidence. Heck no.
    Instead, the guy I falsely accused would be confronted by the MSM about his Evil Behaviour. His reputation would be defamed; he’d be forced to defend himself. Against my false accusations.
    I think that there is something seriously flawed with this system. And – The Liberals have moved into exploiting its flawed nature to the fullest.
    The Liberals make all kinds of unfounded and defamatory accusations in the House to make the CPC look bad – and they aren’t held accountable. Mission accomplished. Use the MSM and House privilege to defame others and get off scott free yourself.
    There’s a serious flaw in this system that allows a political party to defame others – without any evidence, without accountability, without liability.

  29. Quite the cat-fight going on in debate in House right now re Opposition Motion on Women.The NDP (Dawn Black) just hammering the Libs on no broken childcare promises.Minna,and Burning Crosses Fry not too happy about the truth being put out there.Keep up the good fight NDP,you are good for some small thing after all!

  31. can PMSH vote on the budget daily, or answer each question with a referance to the budget, it should send the lieberals scurrying for the halls. where CBCpravda reports them as in attendance but waylaid.
    they are however very careful to point out when Borat Dion is in attendance.
    ZeeBeeZeePrafda Hall Liberal Hall da time :Borat Dion.

  32. What is the mandate of the opposition. Is it to offer constructive criticism or this pathetic show of perpetual stupidity. This clown show is costing Canadian taxpayers how much a day? There are pressing issues here in Canada and money is being flushed steady by doofus Goodale, Iggyhead and Dion and their ilk. Albertans have for the most part figured out vote right or wrong/ conservative or lieberal but don’t waste your vote on an ndpeer. Canadas potential is being wasted along with countless tax dollars thanks to these jerkoffs called liberals.

  34. The National Post has an excellent editorial on the failure of the Liberal Party to fufill their duty as Opposition. Below is an excerpt:
    “Stephane Dion and his Liberals do know they are Parliament’s “Official Opposition” … and not its Official Abstainers, don’t they?
    Judging by their votes — or lack thereof — on crucial bills and motions this session, it is not obvious to us that the Grits understand the difference. They seem far more interested in smearing the government by perpetuating artificial scandals than voting yea or nay on matters of true concern to the nation.
    Through the last two sitting days of last week and the first two of this week, the Liberals have been obsessed with the Chuck Cadman “scandal.” Day after day, they have used up nearly all their question period time asking Prime Minister Stephen Harper to disprove dubious claims that in 2005 Conservative party officials offered the dying MP a massive life insurance policy in return for his vote to bring down Paul Martin’s Liberal government. The Liberal benches have been packed with enthusiastically hooting back-benchers as Mr. Dion and other leading Liberals have hurled thin, salacious accusations at Mr. Harper. But when it came time on Tuesday to vote on the budget, how many of those same Liberals bothered to show up? Exactly 11.
    The Liberals’ reasoning here is quite transparent. Throwing eggs at the government over the Cadman allegations might win them votes in the next election, while voting against the budget might actually trigger such an election. And while the Liberals are keen to improve their electoral fortunes, they are deathly afraid of bringing the government down now because they are said to be badly in debt, bitterly divided over Mr. Dion’s leadership and unprepared to face voters. So instead of performing their proper role in the national debate — providing sensible alternatives to government bills — the Liberals are hiding in their Parliament Hill holes and poking up their heads only when it suits their party’s parochial interests.”
    But, just because ‘we’ and the NP and some others are saying this, doesn’t mean that the Liberal strategy of ignoring this duty and instead, setting up artificial scandals and smearing the CPC and Harper, won’t work among the public.
    With our modern electronic era, all these false and utterly unfounded allegations are reported on television, in the MSM, repeated in clips on various political shows and the news. The fact that they are reported transforms them into reliable information, into ‘facts’.
    The Liberal agenda is not about truth but is to use the freedom of the House of Commons to libel, to defame, to make the most vicious and unfounded accusations and have these accusations moved into the public domain as Information, as Facts. It’s pure propaganda, a malicious use of the House and the MSM to manipulate the public.
    This is a despicable use of the House of Commons, a despicable use of the rule in that House that what you say there is immune from the Laws of our land (Defamation and Libel).
    That is, in the House, you can lie and defame someone – without any resultant court case against you for such malicious behaviour.
    Who is going to confront the Liberals on this misuse of the House, and their abrogation of their duty as the Opposition?

  35. Which way do the parties vote?
    The Dips and Bloc might be proud of the fact that they opposed the government of the day
    What if they walk out before the vote is called?
    Do the tories sit on their hands ?
    What if they walk?

  36. Just watched Prime Minister Stephen Harper deftly use Jack Layton against Stepane Dion during question period,brilliant.

  37. An Opposition that denigrates opposition.
    Why? Because they did not win the election.
    “Dis is not fair, I want a recount with a million more votes via Adscam in the LIEberal column.”
    Wah, wah, wah,….
    Cheers
    Hans-Christian Georg Rupprecht BGS, PDP, CFP
    Commander in Chief
    Frankenstein Battalion
    2nd Squadron: Ulanen-(Lancers) Regiment Großherzog Friedrich von
    Baden(Rheinisches) Nr.7(Saarbrucken)
    Knecht Rupprecht Division
    Hans Corps
    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group “True North”

  38. Again, what is going on in the House?
    The Liberals are reneging on their duty as Opposition and are instead, using the sanctity of the House to make repeated, ungrounded, undocumented accusations alleging corruption etc by the Conservatives and Harper. They refuse to make these allegations outside of the House because they could end up in criminal court for defamation.
    However, they are using the modern electronic televising of the House’s Question Period to get these allegations out to the Canadian public – who don’t realize these are unfounded defamations.
    Who is going to stop this violation of the House of Common’s role?
    Now, Jack Layton is going to Larry King’s show about the NAFTA-Clinton-Obama ‘leak’. Dion is screaming about it up in Canada; Layton is heading for the US. They are fighting with each other for Who Is The Real Opposition Party.
    Who and what is going to end this? The Liberal Party is violating the morality of the House of Commons.

  39. [Quote}The Liberal agenda is not about truth but is to use the freedom of the House of Commons to libel, to defame, to make the most vicious and unfounded accusations and have these accusations moved into the public domain as Information, as Facts. It’s pure propaganda, a malicious use of the House and the MSM to manipulate the public.[/quote]
    You have that absolutely right! I am amassed by the uncivilized behavior in H of C. It’s like watching a Jerry Springer show that lacks adult supervision.
    It is disrespectable of the peoples House… The Speaker should demand a degree of decency & accountability of all MP’s
    Perhaps a Class Action against the MSM would put a price on their deviant behavior.

  40. Further to my comments above about the two unknown operatives who visited Cadman the following is an exerpt from an editorial in todays Toronto Star:
    “Just what did Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservative party – or people claiming to act for it – offer independent MP Chuck Cadman for his support back in May 2005?”
    http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/309756
    -OR PEOPLE CLAIMING TO ACT FOR IT-
    It would seem that I’m not the only one doing the supposing.
    NeilD

  41. [quote]Now, Jack Layton is going to Larry King’s show about the NAFTA-Clinton-Obama ‘leak’. Dion is screaming about it up in Canada; Layton is heading for the US [/quote]
    How stupid can they get! Obama had 15 sec of embarrassment over NAFTA because one dumb ass was talking to another dumb ass..
    Will King play this as a secret plot. NOT! It is only an issue for the mentally challenged

  42. Even Kinsella is laughing his ass off about this silly motion. I’m amazed that the CP piece somehow tried to make it seem like a positive move.

  43. phillip g. shaw – A class action suit against the MSM? How about against the Liberals – and the Speaker?
    I’m absolutely fed up with the dereliction of duty and the rejection of responsibility of the Liberal Party as Opposition. They are supposed to act for our interests. Instead, they are acting only and totally – for their own interests.
    They are supposed to act as a critical and analytic opposition. Instead, they either reject automatically as if they were a slot machine, or, they abdicate any dialogue, debate and critique – and, in addition, simply don’t show up for the vote.
    They concentrate their energy on vicious, malicious and unfounded defamatory accusations in the House, secure that they are legally immune in the House for defamatory statements. They don’t dare repeat those accusations outside the House.
    They rely on the MSM to televise and publicize these accusations to the public, who don’t realize they are defamatory and without evidence, who accept them as valid, as information. They therefore use our own media systems, funded by the taxpayer, as a malicious propaganda against our government.
    Who is going to stop the Liberals from this abuse of Parliament and this abuse of the media?

  44. http://warrenkinsella.com/
    “I see this.
    http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/309759
    You know, if one ever needed conclusive proof that Jerry Yanover has retired, this one would be it. “Laughable” does not begin to describe it. “Laughable” is too kind.
    Lord God Almighty, the Liberal Party of Canada needs help.”
    Yes Warren, ONLY the LORD GOD ALMIGHTY could offer redemption to these hapless political lepers.
    They are on their own, quite irrevocably lost.
    And that is quite the statement, from someone who plays in a punk band with the moniker “SH*T FROM HELL”.
    The LIEberals know no shame, nor humility, and ultimately it will be their undoing.
    Welcome to Hades ladies and gentlemen, the temperature will be rising shortly.
    Cheers
    Hans-Christian Georg Rupprecht BGS, PDP, CFP
    Commander in Chief
    Frankenstein Battalion
    2nd Squadron: Ulanen-(Lancers) Regiment Großherzog Friedrich von
    Baden(Rheinisches) Nr.7(Saarbrucken)
    Knecht Rupprecht Division
    Hans Corps
    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group “True North”

  45. Layton will be on Lou Dobbs,not Larry King.This should be just great!Dobbs is major protectionist,and Layton,on Duff is going to be on fighting about Can.jobs.Duff pointed out to Jackass,that Dobbs wouls slam border shut,no more softwood etc,but the frigging airhead doesn’t get it! Could be much worse folks…it coulda been Steffi,but I guess no one would understand him!

  47. So the Dion/Borat liberals are condemning the ndp and blockheads for helping install the Conservative government that the liberals themselves are unwilling to try to topple?
    The ndp and blockheads are to blame for installing the scary Harper government that stays in power because the liberals sit on their hands or run away or even vote against their own motions?
    I guess in liberal lala land that’s logical.
    Eventually someone in the liberal media has to gag over this, don’t they?
    Or does supporting the liberals trump all other concerns?

  49. At least the Liberal party is being consistent. You won’t see them toppling governments.

  50. What if the Conservatives were to indicate that they plan to vote with the Liberals on this one, and that they consider it a confidence motion? Do you think the Liberals would abstain?

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation