It’s Too Quiet Out There

On the eve of the CFL Western Final, the Saskatchewan Roughriders have gone mute. So much so, that their silence has become the sports story of the week.

“Whad’sa matter with you guys? Where’s the trash talk? Whad’ya expect us to write about? “

Proving that no news is well…. big news, I guess. And proving that their synaptic connections are held together by old jockstraps, today BC Lions management has called on the CFL to investigate.
The other news? The volume has been maxed out on the audio system at BC Place to try to prepare their team for a stadium full of the noisiest out-of-town fans on the planet.

Taylor Field, Regina, SK. Saskatchewan fans have been known to make it impossible for visiting teams to hear calls at home games at Taylor Field. They are likely to be in abundance at BC Place.

Too quiet, or too noisy? Make up your mind, people.
Heh.

News You Haven’t Heard

Senator Norm Coleman’s letter to Kofi Annan on behalf of the Senate Subcommittee on Investigations;

As you know, there are allegations of misconduct and mismanagement by the U.N. and/or its agents, including allegations of bribery, conflict of interest and fraud. The recently published report by Charles Duelfer…revealed additional evidence that Benon Sevan, Executive Director of the U.N. Office of the Iraq program, may have received oil allocations from the government of Iraq. Accordingly, these allegations have raised serious questions concerning the management of the U.N. OFF program and the U.N.’s capacity to enforce a similar sanctions regime in the future.
In light of those concerns, we requested your consent to interview key U.N. personnel and review related documents…. In your response of September 29th, you declined to produce the requested documents and U.N. personnel.
We are troubled by your response for a number of reasons…

Related:
ctv.jpg
Via Powerline.

Saving Kathy Tomlinson

Daniel Henninger of the Wall Street Journal.

Large media institutions, such as CBS or the New York Times, have been regarded as nothing if not authoritative. In the Information Age, authority is a priceless franchise. But it is this franchise that Big Media, incredibly, has just thrown away. It did so by choosing to go into overt opposition to one party’s candidate, a sitting president. It stooped to conquer.
The prominent case studies here are Dan Rather’s failed National Guard story on CBS and the front page the past year of the New York Times (a proxy for many large dailies). Add in as well Big Media’s handling of Abu Ghraib, a real story that got blown into a monthlong bonfire that obviously was intended to burn down the legitimacy of the war in Iraq. I think many people thought the over-the-top Abu Ghraib coverage, amid a war, was the media shouting fire in a crowded theater.

Heavily consolidated Canadian media outlets are just as professionally corrupt. With no Wall Street Journal or Foxnews to provide an balancing establishment lens against which to compare and critique, the left-liberal spin is not only rampant, it’s unbelievably clumsy. Case in point, last evening’s CTV National News included a segment by Kathy Tomlinson who seems to spend much of her time in Washington covering the Democratic Underground.
Heavily paraphrased, her report evolved in the following manner;

“Voters in the US recently indicated “moral values” were behind the re-election of President Bush, and now there is a climate of fear that airing the Spielberg movie Saving Private Ryan (which has bad words and violence that Spielberg won’t allow cut) could result in FCC fines (like they did for Janet Jackson’s tit) because Bush is sending soldiers to Iraq where there is real fighting and killing and he doesn’t want Americans to see what that looks like”

I kid you not.
Henninger has cautionary words for the likes of Ms. Tomlinson.

Authority can be a function of raw power, but among free people it is sustained by esteem and trust. Should esteem and trust falter, the public will start to contest an institution’s authority. It happens all the time to political figures. It happened here to the American Catholic Church and to the legal profession, thanks to plaintiff-bar abuse. And now the public is beginning to contest the decades-old authority of the mainstream media.
Two months ago, Gallup reported that public belief in the media’s ability to report news accurately and fairly had fallen to 44%–what Gallup called a significant drop from 54% just a year ago. The larger media outlets have been pushing the edge of the partisanship envelope for a long time. People have kvetched about “spin” for years but then largely internalized it. Not in 2004. Big Media chose precisely the wrong moment to give itself over to an apparent compulsion to overthrow the Bush presidency.

Left wing CBC TV has long suffered for their sins. Were it not for a billion dollars in federal funding, a 6% audience share would have closed the doors years ago. The scandal damaged BBC has announced dramatic staff cuts. Circulation figures for many major newspapers are falling. In contrast, more and more consumers state they are obtaining their news and opinion from internet sources.
Liberal friendly Candian media has had the luxury of a huge ideological cushion provided by the Liberal appointed CRTC – but as the influence of online news and opinion sources continues to grow, the blocking of sources like Foxnews will no longer protect them.
I sent an email last night to complain about the segment, something I rarely do anymore. For 20 years I was a nightly viewer of CTV National News. Today, I’d estimate I catch the broadcast only once every week or two. They’ve become “CBC light”, and with so many other games in town, I can’t be bothered.

Stonechild Questions

The Saskatoon Police Service finds itself in another crisis, courtesy of a recently released review of a 14 year old case involving the freezing death of 17 year old Neil Stonechild. The CBC bio paints a picture of a artistic, enthusiastic, “popular” young man who attended his AA meetings faithfully, was well loved by social workers, who painted murals on the walls at the detention center. Absence and political correctness make the heart grow fonder. A friend whose son went to school with him remarked that their first reaction to news of Stonechild’s demise was “good riddence”. The AA member was found with a blood alcohol level of 1.5.
Riding the media frenzy, U of Sask business professor Colin Boyd has called, through a piece in the Saskatoon Star Phoenix, for the dissolution of the Saskatoon Police Service, suggesting the force be replaced by the RCMP. Quite apart from the logistics and costs in firing over 370 city police, the problems incorporating the RCMP’s different operational paradigm, is the wonderment that someone in academia would make such a bold suggestion without surrendering himself to the troubling inconvenience of fact checking. The Police Act requires Saskatchewan communities of over 20.000 to provide their own policing.
This CBC report summarizes the current crisis, while this covers the accusations and chain of events.
Justice David Wright’s final report concluded Bradley Senger and Lawrence Hartwig had Stonechild in their custody 4 days before his frozen body was found in a field on the north end of Saskatoon. Senger and Hartwig maintain they were called to investigate a complaint about Stonechild causing a disturbance, but that he was gone by the time they arrived. Justice Wright was suspicious that the two officers did not seem to have any recollection of having looked for Stonechild, despite the discovery of his body a few days later.
From the report;

I cannot accept that Cst. Hartwig simply forgot about the search for Stonechild when he learned of the death, or that he failed to recognize the complaint might have some significance to the investigation into Stonechild’s death. In all of the circumstances, his assertion that he did not recall what happened is simply not credible. I conclude that he recalled what happened, and his assertions are a deliberate deception designed to conceal his involvement.

His conclusion defies logic. These two officers would have been fully aware that their call to the complaint about Stonechild would be part of dispatch, CPIC, other Saskatoon Police Service Reports – and their own notebooks. To purposefully deny knowledge in hopes of covering up their involvement would be patently absurd. Why pretend to forget, when remembering carried no more weightier implicatiion than the official police record?
And why might they forget? Earlier in the report, Justice Wright mentions that these two officers – one with 3 years experience, the other a rookie, had performed the task of informing a woman her husband had taken the lives of himself and their sons earlier in that same evening.
I also found puzzling the judge’s contention that he cannot believe that some details of that evening would be remembered clearly by the officers, while others were not. Memory doesn’t function in the way that a tape recorder does – rather, it’s better described as a process of re-creation, the brain drawing on stored information and incorporating it with global knowledge. It’s the reason that “false memory syndrome” exists, memory recovery through hypnosis is virtually useless and eyewitness reports notoriously unreliable.
Wright’s decision to discount their testimony seems to be solely based on this forgetfulness and the testimony of a friend of Stonechild, one Jason Roy;

“A police car pulled in front of me and Neil was in the back, and the moment he saw me he was very irate, he was freaking out he was saying, ‘J[ason] help me. Just help me. These guys are going to kill me.’

Jason Roy was busy compiling a fine criminal record of his own. He didn’t come forward with his story about the cry for help until after receiving visualization therapy at Kilborn detention center for juvenile offenders.
Autopsy photos
In addition to believing that Roy was more credible than the police officers, Wright discounted the testimony of two trained forensic pathologists who expressed doubt that marks photographed on Stonechild’s body were caused by handcuffs. He suggested that the testimony of Dr. Lew – a forensic pathologist for Dade County, FL – wasn’t credible and that she was “enhancing her opinion”.

“I shared the same experience as other observers at the Inquiry: I could not see any striations of the sort described by Dr. Lew. If I stood alone in this failure I might feel differently.”

I wasn’t aware that Justice Wright had company on the bench. Considering that his final report recommends a review of the coroner system, Wright seems unpreturbed about his own lack of expertise before discounting the opinion of trained pathologists.
Justice Wright doesn’t seem to take as much issue with the coroner – a retired general practitioner with no forensic background, whose original report bears little resemblance to the story of the body being “beaten and dragged” he told a reporter 12 years later. (Coroners require no training at all in Saskatchewan – a hangover from the exodus of doctors during the early days of medicare.)
Today, Chief Russ Sabo is to announce his decision on the future of the two officers accused.
Those who have been calling for their heads caution that Wright has “not accused Bradley Senger and Lawrence Hartwig of causing Stonechild’s death”. Justice officials have stated that there isn’t enough evidence to sustain formal charges. (The Wright inquiry was not conducted under the normal rules of evidence.)
Well, I’m afraid this “they had him, not saying they killed him” disclaimer falls right through the middle of the logic gap.
If the two officers did have Stonechild in their custody, then we know they not record his arrest at the time the apprehended him, indicating that they intended to discharge of Stonechild in a manner beyond the normal police protocols the moment they spotted him.
That’s pre-mediitation.
The media and Justice Wright need to be pushed off the fence on this one. If one is to accept that Senger and Hartwig had Stonechild in their custody, then criminal charges should be laid. Why? Because, their current position is unsustainable and grossly unfair. They stand “convicted” at arms length, of causing Neil Stonechild’s death – without the benefit of a bona fide court of law and the normal rules of evidence – while the public has been encouraged to connect the dots.
To those calling for the dissolution of the service because of the very real possibility of a police “mutiny” – put yourselves in the position of every police officer in Saskatoon, facing the profound realization that the day could come when they are called to the stand to account for the whereabouts of a suspect they never located, on a night in which they answered over 50 calls, based on the late-breaking memory of a convicted felon, 10 years after taking a complaint.
A great many people have suggested that had Neil Stonechild been a white kid from a “good” family, without a criminal record, the investigation into his freezing death would have been much more enthusiastic – and I agree. I suspect police investigate violence against the innocent with more zeal than they do the deaths of drunk drivers, too.
But if Neil Stonechild had been a white kid with no criminal record, found frozen with alcohol in his system, we wouldn’t have seen a racially charged public inquiry into it 14 years after the fact, either. It would have remained on the books as just another case of death by misadventure.
Stonechild report
update – Officers Hartwig and Senger have been dismissed. They are expected to appeal the decision. Stay tuned.

Continue reading →

Their Names Live On

Bush pilot Doug Chisholm is one cool guy.

In World War II, some 91,000 Saskatchewan men nearly 10% of the total provincial population joined various branches of the armed forces. Of these, more than 3,800 never returned. Following the end of the war, the government of Saskatchewan designated geographic features, such as lakes, islands, and bays, as a permanent testimonial to those who had made the supreme sacrifice.
Since 1997, pilot and photographer Doug Chisholm has undertaken the task of photographing from the air the thousands of sites named for these fallen young men. A selection of his photographs is presented in this volume, together with stories by Gerald Hill based on interviews conducted with friends and family members who remember the lives of these men. Also included in this volume is a comprehensive list of Saskatchewan’s fallen and the sites named in honour of them.

More.

If Ye Break Faith


In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.
We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved, and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders fields.
Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.

cen.jpg Delisle Cenotaph
The procession to lay the wreaths is led each year by bagpipers, and an RCMP honour guard. The small red plastic poppies scattered at the base are worn on lapels across Canada to honour the fallen in the days leading up to Nov.11.

Coffee, Tea or Mach 10?

Via OTB;

They call it a “scramjet,” an engine so blindingly fast that it could carry an airplane from San Francisco to Washington, D.C., in about 20 minutes

.
I don’t think I’d want to be pushing that service cart.

Next week, NASA plans to break the aircraft speed record for the second time in 7 1/2 months by flying its rocket-assisted X-43A scramjet craft 110,000 feet above the Pacific Ocean at speeds close to Mach 10 — about 7,200 mph, or 10 times the speed of sound. The flight will last perhaps 10 seconds and end with the pilotless aircraft plunging to a watery grave 850 miles off the California coast.

I guess they meant to say New York to San Fransisco!

In The Service Of The Queen

CBFTW publishes an email from his battalion commander.

This war on terrorism will be with us for some time, so I offer an open letter to the generation I will pass this burden on to.
I believe that we are making progress in Iraq and in Afghanistan. Despite the ravings of pundits and uninformed ambulance chasers, this fight doesn’t hinge on oil or payback. It isn’t about religion or race. And it damn sure is not about any innate desire to rule the world. These people will succeed or fail on their own merits. The task is daunting. You can release a person from bondage. You can remove a tyrant from power. You can create the conditions for liberty. But, you cannot simply grant or proclaim freedom. Freedom without honest action is a whisper in a storm just as change without vision and purpose is the illusion of progress. For ages these people were literally beaten to the point of submission by oppression, censure, murder, torture, and rape – regardless of age or gender. I have asked myself why they let it happen. The only answer I can fathom is that evil flourished because good people refused to pay the price required to oppose it. Sure, it’s easy now to pontificate and blame the poor and down trodden for their collective indifference, but forgive my sarcasm – I think we owe them more than a couple of days to realize that their hopes and dreams have a chance to grow and one day flourish.
[…]
The threat we face is like nothing we’ve seen before. I’ve been in the streets with this enemy, fought him face to face, and have been lucky enough to kill him and come out alive. I have seen what he is capable of doing and the zeal with which he will do it. This threat won’t fit neatly into “the box” or be governed by any paradigm. It is a cancer within our collective body as the human race. We are all threatened by this evil, and evil it is. This enemy has twisted and distorted things both sacred and profane to guide as well as justify its means and its stated end. Nothing is beyond the realm of the possible when it comes to the depths to which it will sink, the horror it is willing to commit, or the suffering it is willing to inflict. This enemy has no concept of mercy nor does it recognize combatants. Innocence is not a factor. You need only look at the headlines of the day to confirm that children, teachers, and doctors are murdered everyday by these villains. What makes them evil? I submit that it is not the act that earns them the epithet of evil – it is the intent to commit and the pride theydraw from the act. These animals revel in the post act announcements that they are responsible. They feel vindicated by the proclamations that they perpetrated these horrors in the name of God and that having committed the seacts some how elevates them. Make no mistake, this enemy is formidable but by no means invincible. To defeat this cancer requires the one thing that civilized people all over the world possess in absolute abundance – The will. The will to be free can only be surrendered by the person that has it – it cannot be murdered, raped, tortured, or stolen. It’s not about being a martyr or a saint, it’s about being a decent human being. And, the unvarnished truth is that the killing and the horror will continue until those with the will to endure prevail.

In the interest of balance, I offer this soaring and evocative counter-argument by a devotee of the Church Of Moral Relativism.

100,000 Dead. Give or Take.

In late October, the New York Times reported that a study by a survey team from Johns Hopkins University found that 100,000 Iraqi civilians have died as a result of the war. Unsurprisingly, this figure has been added to the rhetoric of the finger pointing sect. Don’t expect it to fade away any time soon.
In Slate, Fred Kaplan fills in the absent explanation of the “mathology” employed.

The report’s authors derive this figure by estimating how many Iraqis died in a 14-month period before the U.S. invasion, conducting surveys on how many died in a similar period after the invasion began (more on those surveys later), and subtracting the difference. That difference�the number of “extra” deaths in the post-invasion period – signifies the war’s toll. That number is 98,000. But read the passage that cites the calculation more fully:

We estimate there were 98,000 extra deaths (95% CI 8000-194 000) during the post-war period.

Readers who are accustomed to perusing statistical documents know what the set of numbers in the parentheses means. For the other 99.9 percent of you, I’ll spell it out in plain English – which, disturbingly, the study never does. It means that the authors are 95 percent confident that the war-caused deaths totaled some number between 8,000 and 194,000. (The number cited in plain language 98,000 is roughly at the halfway point in this absurdly vast range.)

In other words, calculated using loose mix of algebra and astrology.

The Collapse

Once again, Wretchard is providing riveting analysis of events in Fallujah (and the peripheral skirmishes), piecing together reports from imbedded journalists and placing them against a background of coherent military analysis and context.

The enemy withdrawals have sometimes been explained by suggesting that the enemy is suckering in US forces into a trap. But this is impossible. Their backs are to the river and the Marines are across that. Every retrograde movement compresses the enemy into a smaller area and forces them to leave behind prepared positions painstakingly stockpiled with food, batteries and ammo. Running backward with wounded, they can’t carry much ammunition and won’t find any unless a prepared position is already available. And how does anyone stand fast in the face of the otherworldly violence of the American onslaught?

If you’re new to the Belmont Club, be forewarned – the inevitable fallout of reading Wretchard is that you spend a lot more wasted effort yelling back at the radio and TV “news”.
Addendum This observation from Lileks;

Paul Harvey, of all people, noted that the hard phase of the battle would involve house-to-house combat, “just like Vietnam.” Sigh. It’s now the all-purpose metaphor. There could be a war on the moon with armies on dune buggies launching crossbows at each other, and someone would pronounce it a repeat of a disastrous battle in the Mekong Delta. But he’d be 108 years old, the last boomer, a brittle old survivor – not the Greatest Generation but the Generation that Grates, determined that any conflict should be seen through the prism of his youth with “White Rabbit” playing in the background. Times have changed. It’s FLIR and Kid
Rock now, I think. Stay tuned, and keep them in your thoughts.
The Marines, I mean.

“I Just Love My Job”

A snapshot of modern warfare. The Belmont Club exerpts a DailyTelegraph report.

“I got myself a real juicy target,” shouted Sgt James Anyett, peering through the thermal sight of a Long Range Acquisition System (LRAS) mounted on one of Phantom’s Humvees. “Prepare to copy that 89089226. Direction 202 degrees. Range 950 metres. I got five motherf****** in a building with weapons.” A dozen loud booms rattle the sky and smoke rose as mortars rained down on the co-ordinates the sergeant had given. “Yeah,” he yelled. “Battle Damage Assessment – nothing. Building’s gone. I got my kills, I’m coming down.
“I just love my job.”
… The insurgents, not understanding the capabilities of the LRAS, crept along rooftops and poked their heads out of windows. Even when they were more than a mile away, the soldiers of Phantom Troop had their eyes on them. Lt Jack Farley, a US Marines officer, sauntered over to compare notes with the Phantoms. “You guys get to do all the fun stuff,” he said. “It’s like a video game. We’ve taken small arms fire here all day. It just sounds like popcorn going off.”

Wretchard explains:

This engagement is all the more chilling because it probably happened at night. Five enemy soldiers died simply because they could not comprehend how destruction could flow from an observer a mile away networked to mortars that could fire for effect without ranging. All over Fallujah virtual teams of snipers and fire-control observers are jockeying for lines of sight to deal death to the enemy. For many jihadis that one peek over a sill could be their last.
[…]
Capabilities which didn’t exist on September 11 have now been deployed in combat. It isn’t that American forces have become inconceivably lethal that is scary; it is that the process has just started.

(Crossposted to the Shotgun)

Locomotive Lottery II or “Sorry, Play Again!”

More Darwinian trainspotting, this time with more substantive results!


A French antinuclear protester was killed yesterday
in eastern France when his leg was severed by a train carrying radioactive waste to Germany, officials said.

oh.. sweet irony…

Paramedics quickly cared for protester Sebastien Briat, 21, after the accident near the town of Avricourt, but he died on the way to a hospital, officials said. He had been surprised by the train while trying to chain himself to the tracks as part of a protest.

21? Probably a clean cull.

Locomotive Lottery

Pittsburgh Tribune-Review:

A Jeannette woman who was slightly injured after being struck by a train while walking along railroad tracks sued Norfolk Southern Corp. Thursday for failing to warn pedestrians that trains travel on tracks.
Patricia M. Frankhouser, of 910 Scott Ave., is seeking an unspecified amount inexcess of $30,000 from the Norfolk, Va., rail transport company for the Jan. 6 incident that left her with a broken finger, cuts on her hand and pain, according to the suit.
Greensburg attorney Harry F. Smail Jr., who represents Frankhouser, didn’t return a call seeking comment.
Within the filing, he argues that the railroad was negligent for failing to post signs warning “of the dangers of walking near train tracks and that the tracks wereactively in use.”

I’d argue that any client too stupid to pull of a proper self-inflicted locomotive injury isn’t worth representing.
hat tip – King of Fools

Breaking Blatantly Obvious News

Broadcasting & Cable

Players involved in the notorious 60 Minutes II story, reported by Dan Rather,�which employed dubious documents regarding President Bush�s National Guard service, may have been rooting for a John Kerry victory.
No, it wasn’t that old bugaboo liberal media bias as much as it was a bias toward saving their own skins. The report from an internal investigation into the documents mess was purposely being held until after the election.
Pre-election, the feeling in some quarters at CBS was that if Kerry triumphed, fallout from the investigation would be relatively minimal. The controversial piece�s producer, Mary Mapes, would likely be suspended or fired, but a long list of others up the chain of command – from 60 Minutes II executive producer Josh Howard, to Rather and all the way up to news division President Andrew Heyward – would escape more or less unscathed.
But now, faced with four more years of President Bush, executives at CBS parent Viacom could take a harder line on the executives involved.

(Via Drudge)
On a related topic, Eric Engbert a retired correspondant for CBS criticizes the “blogosphere” for publishing leaked exit polls.

“The public is now assaulted by news and pretend-news from many directions, thanks to the now infamous “information superhighway.” But the ability to transmit words, we learned during the Citizens Band radio fad of the 70’s, does not mean that any knowledge is being passed along. One of the verdicts rendered by election night 2004 is that, given their lack of expertise, standards and, yes, humility, the chances of the bloggers replacing mainstream journalism are about as good as the parasite replacing the dog it fastens on.”

Oh, enough already. CBS had their asses handed to them by the blogosphere (in other words- the audience) because certain “professional journalists” perpetrated an intentional, albeit pathetically clumsy, attempt to influence the election. Period.
Only the most obtuse observers of human nature would believe that “Rathergate” was an isolated incident. It is only after long history of success in not getting caught that professional liars become so sloppy. Add another period.
Bitching about the leaking of exit polls is so much irrelevant smoke by Mr Engbert, though it does make one wonder how he can argue that the MSM knows better than to release exit polls because they are known to be unreliable, and “responsible” journalists know better. If this is indeed the case, one should ask him to explain why they commission the polls in the first place. If exit polls require a full day of sampling to provide meaningful results, then why not just wait for the ballot counting to start?
Of course, we should give Mr. Engbert the benefit of the doubt. It could well be that he is basing his opinion on information recieved anonymously from a Kinkos in Texas that has been authenticated by experts contacted by CBS.
With several pithy observations about the fact-checking failures by Eric Engberg, James Joyner weighs in.
Paul, at Wizbang reviews events and calls ’em as he sees ’em. “The whole right side of the blogosphere knew the numbers were bogus long before CBS and the MSM knew”

Fact checking The “Bad” American Economy

In the lead up to, and wake of, the US Presidential election, Canadians have had no shortage of opinions about the state of affairs of our southern neighbors. Judging by the comments to phone-in shows from local talk radio to the CBC’s nationally broadcast Cross Country Checkup yesterday, many are rather smug.
The assumption that our economy is stronger is based on some valid arguments – running consecutive surpluses at the federal level is one of them, the “strengthening” Canadian dollar is another. However, Canadians seem blissfully unaware of what the falling US dollar means for our trade based economy. Many seem to believe that the most important consequence is less costly vacations in the US.
In reality, the huge competitive advantage a 65 cent dollar gave exporters is beginning to change. Canadians are going to have to become more productive and efficient to make up the difference. We’re already about 25% less productive than the average American – with a 25% lower standard of living to show for it. Unless you’re one of those vacationing civil servants, you’re probably going to feel the effects.
The most common misconception is that the USA is suffering from high unemployment and a crushing national debt. It’s not really our fault – this been the steady mantra of ill-informed news media too lazy or unmotivated to do a little fact checking. In fact, unemployment rates in the US today are around the same level as during the Clinton years. It helps to place US data up against our own.

Unemployment rate (Oct’04):
Fed Debt as % of GDP (2003):
US – 5.5%
US – 36.1%
Canada – 7.1%
Canada – 42%

(Figures from gov’t sources, Stats Can, etc.)
Most industrialized countries have debts hovering around the 100% of GDP mark. Historically, the US federal debt was at an alltime high during WWII when it reached 125% of GDP.
Is the current deficit and military spending high? Yes and no. There is cause for concern in any deficit spending, but then again – the US is at war and we’re not. And as military spending goes, the US is currently a far cry from their peak (1945), when they spent 38.5% of GNP on the military. Today, the US spends 3.6% of GDP on the military, lower than the average of 5.7% spent during the post-war years of 1940- 2000. *

Navigation