I have a 39 year old friend in NYC who is battling breast cancer. I have another friend in her 40’s in Chicago who is also battling breast cancer. Three years ago, I had two friends in their 50’s, in Chicago and Houston respectively, battling breast cancer.
The Manhattan friend just shared this with me. While I can’t verify the 20 year average age drop in breast cancer since the Covid jab, I have my strong suspicions.
Learned via via, that in 100 bed hosptial in ON breast cancer rates went from 5 a year pre covid to 200 a year now.
@eddowd has a lot to say, show and disseminate about this.
The cancer rate inflection and overall expected death rates start a new, higher, inflection point starting mid-2021.
What……changed? Hmmmmm.
Strange isn’t it how governments haven’t asked or disclosed vax status of the cancer case vs non-vaxxed. They sure seem interested in everything else.
For the Egyptians around here, get another jab. Life is very happy along Denial St
I don’t know. Have the CBC tried to debunk rumours to that effect? If not, consider the jury still out.
I won’t argue against the bad shite that has resulted from the not vaccine, but, in this aspect, has anyone factored in the rise of female body “enhancement” procedures? Just asking.
Hmmmm…can’t say to a certainty that its breast cancer specifically but I have noticed an uptick of cancers in people in my orbit and age range. Strange. Maybe it’s just that…age range.
The type of cancers runs the gamut…prostate, pancreatic and yes, breast cancer. Pancreatic hits home with me because my sister in law has it and she’s relatively young and fully vaxxed. *ahem*
But hey, thanks for the uplifting topic Robert…I was just starting to feel good about myself.
I would agree with you on this, Burton. I was diagnosed with breast cancer in April 2025 and the past nine months have been eye-opening for me, to say the least. I’ve received treatment at two different hospitals and the number of cancer patients (various types) is staggering. Chemo suites are packed, and the beds/chairs are full of seniors. I’ve also noticed there are more women patients than men. It could just be the aging population. Personally, I know three younger women who’ve battled cancer recently: two with breast, one with colon.
I wish you all the best Ontario Kate.
I look at it this way. One of the more promising angles of attacking cancer in the last decade was immunotherapy, which was basically training a patients immune system to attack their cancer cells.
People who got the vaccine instead trained their immune system to focus on reacting to a spike protein sequence that , thanks to mutations, hasn’t existed in the wild for years.
It’s not really surprising that many of these vaxxed people are getting common things an immune system can usually handle like RSV, and a smaller number aren’t fighting off cancers they otherwise would have.
I thought there was a (super controversial) theory that women who were constantly ovulating were at a higher risk of breast cancer.
As pregnancies drop because of contraception, breast cancer rises.
Seems like something feminists would hate to hear, that’s for sure.
Don’t know if it was disproven or just shuttered due to politics.
Pretty much the same theory as breast feeding reduces breast cancer. And people have pretty much quit having kids.
I was of that belief as well.
Cancer is taking a heavy toll on my immediate family.
Pancreatic version felled one family member, and his wife had a recurrence of a type of cancer that had been in remission for twenty years. When she was declared cancer free twenty years ago, doctors told her that type of cancer never returned. Little did they know…
I think there are real reasons as to why the Canadian health authorities didn’t keep statistics of sicknesses in vaxed people separate from those who weren’t jabbed.
And I think that says about all you need to know about the Canadian health authorities. There are valid reasons why the #Libranos never give straight answers in the House of Commons too.
Breast cancer screening mammography in women under 50 is one of those high income generating Big Pharma type sacred cow industries. Screening in that age group has 30% or more rates of both false positive and false negative rates meaning it misses 30% or cancers and sends 30% of women in for cancer follow up they don’t need. There is also huge controversy if most small isolated cancers even need treatment. Ductal in situ carcinoma often goes away by itself. So a lot of these so called breast cancer survivors may be victims of medical system hysteria and over treatment by the medical industrial complex. In spite of a vast array of evidence, much of it from Canada’s best epidemiologists over many years in huge studies, Manitoba recently changed the standard for breast cancer screening from age 50 onward to age 40.
My son-in-law is currently awaiting surgery for a hernia. He has no date. Manitoba has been flooded by so many women needing breast cancer surgery that everything else, like his surgery is on hold until further notice. The question is does this mean Manitoba is having an insane surge of new breast cancers or is Manitoba a victim of the new mammography standard thanks to lobbying by the same medical industrial complex that brought us the convid plandemic? Staff suddenly dropping dead or ending up too sick to work for reasons unknown except for absolute, 100%, beyond a shadow of a doubt, certainty that it just can’t be the mRNA jab, haven’t helped the situation.
But have no fear. Wab has ordered an internal only review of public health response to the CONVID plandemic to be headed by the (in)famous Dr. Brent Roussin (of “I will destroy any doctor who doesn’t follow orders” fame) so I’m sure all this will be clarified soon.
As an aside, I hear brain tumours in Manitoba have gone up by 400% but that was just an anecdotal rumour I heard from a neurologist who is getting lots and lots of business.
I am assured by him that it is for reasons unknown except for absolute, 100%, beyond a shadow of a doubt, certainty that it just can’t be the mRNA jab