27 Replies to “Next Up: 51st State”

    1. He’s already threatened to tariff the EU if their deal with you should be ‘badly intentioned’ towards us.

  1. I’m glad it never got too overheated between Trump and Denmark. Denmark is a great country. And the women – wow – tall, fit, beautiful blondes as far as the eye can see.

  2. Btw, 2 facts:
    1) Greenlandic (Kalaallisut) is closely related to Canadian Inuktitut.
    2) Greenland is closest geographically to Canada.
    My point is that most logically Canada should have claimed Greenland right after WW2, and certainly by Carney when this debate started.

    But noo, idiot Carney (having no sense of diplomacy and restrain and being driven like always by his TDS + EU fetish) inserted himself into this thing although no one asked him. Taking the worst side – braying that is EU’s.
    Yep, he’s veery smart indeed.

    1. Why is any Canadian surprised that Carney is running back to the comforting embrace of … his people … in Brussels? It’s all he knows. It’s what he is.

      Canada? Puh-leeze.

    2. Frankly, Canada should cede the Eskimo Territory (Nunavut) to Greenland to create a true Eskimo national state. Carney should do this willingly now, but he’ll let Trump make him. Of course, Trump will then demand the Eskimo District of Quebec as well, and won’t that get the fur flying!

    3. Greenland is a welfare state. Currently, it is a negative value to Canada.

      Trump got what he wanted without having to subsidize the locals.

      1. Exactly. They can build bases and keep the Chinese out without having to support all the welfare. Vance mentioned this. Everybody happy. Except the MSM and TDS sufferers.

    4. Greenland is a welfare state. Currently, it is a negative value to Canada.

      Trump got what he wanted without having to subsidize the locals.

    5. In order to have done that you would have had to have been a military power, which you weren’t and aren’t. And you would have had to have gotten permission from Britain; you still have a Governor-General.
      You likely had a better chance back after WWII (but that pesky Cold War security dynamic was a problem — Quebec Agreement?), and you certainly didn’t have a chance now. Denmark wants strategic defense and investment from a more capable country.

    6. or, OR the ‘incompetence’ is long term DELIBERATE to destroy the ‘post national state’s’ prospects, turning it into a bargain basement special where the resources are sold off pennies on the dollar.
      etc etc. no saying l think it is or isnt, just a possibility. CCP our ‘new strategic partner’ think long term all the time. its a communist trait, its why n vietnam won, they would NOT ‘give up and go home’, for one thing, THEY WERE ALREADY THERE.
      Carney is using vaguely similar strategy but for VASTLY different reasons.
      is someone going to do a charlie kirk on him?

  3. 51st state? Why would the greatest country in history want to add a shithole like Canada? Better to let it fail, take the valuable parts and let the rest die.

    1. It would be one giant assho Blue State … we’ve got our own Blue States and Blue cities to laugh at.

      1. “It would be one giant assho Blue State … we’ve got our own Blue States and Blue cities to laugh at.”

        Exactly, Kenji. People who bring up the lame “51st state” BS around me are asked why on earth Donald Trump would possibly want 40 million more *Democrat* voters? I never get an answer…

      1. Yeah … that toque is a little tilted east of the mullet.
        Nevermind me … I live to amuse myself. Cause if you can’t laugh … ?

        1. Just consider my statement as a slight joke as well as truth. I’m a firm believer in laughter and joy.

    1. I don’t tend to gloat over other people’s misery … but in some cases … I can make an exception.

  4. The US used to have multiple bases and 20,000 troops in Greenland. Now they can have 3 bases? I’m guessing the US will never put more than a few hundred troops in Greenland because arming Greenland is beyond stupid.

Navigation