121 Replies to “Strategic Partnership”

    1. You see … your problem roaddog … is that you are a sinner. It’s not enough to make land acknowledgements like some rote recitation of a Christian prayer …

      They sound like microwave warranties, not the desire for atonement.

      The CBA chides that you aren’t making proper … confession of your sins … you aren’t PAYING for your sins … with your land acknowledgement. Time to PAY UP whitey!

      1. They are EXACTLY like that. Ooooh, see how wonderfully non-racist we are with this utterly meaningless land acknowledgement that does absolutely nothing to benefit any citizen with a side order of causing resentments (always good for social cohesion).
        Meanwhile we’re going to use them as cover for why we’re allowing in all these immigrants that spit at will on our laws, customs, and social mores…which also stokes resentment and the breakdown of society.
        In short, a fair load of smelly green road apples.

  1. “Who benefits most from a destabilized, quasi-communist basket case on America’s northern border?”

    Aside from Donald Trump, I can’t name any single who.

    “the overt racism of the Canadian government is astonishing”~roaddog

    The only government in North America that has more overt racism is the U.S. government.
    One would think that this would be expected given the slavery in the U.S., but when Barack Obama ran for the Presidency and people knew really nothing about him but the color of his skin, well they voted for the color of his skin in a show of racism to prove to everybody how not-racist they all were.

    1. And yet:
      https://niche-canada.org/2023/11/24/blood-soaked-commodities-nova-scotia-taxes-and-caribbean-slavery-1789-1824/
      https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/slavery-canada/

      Appears as though Canada profited quite a bit from slavery, Britain profited quite a bit — as long as somebody else got their hands dirty. At least our Confederate slavers were honest and forthcoming. One could make the argument that British and Canadian business interests helped keep slavery in my country afloat.
      So don’t get on your high horse too quickly.

      1. Well, Neuvo Scrotia was once a British colony as were the Carolinas. All 3 had slaves.
        At no time did Canada have slaves, but since the colony banned slavery, we benefit about as much from the “slaves born here are citizens” law as you Yankees do. Yes, we have a Birther Tourism industry too. Yup.

        1. “At no time did Canada have slaves,”

          You mean after the British forced the natives to abandon the practice, right? Canadian aboriginals routinely captured people during their many tribal wars, and those who weren’t tortured to death (for entertainment purposes) were kept as slaves.

          I’m still confused, though, that after all the renaming of Canadian places and removal of statues and such, no one has yet demanded that Brantford Ontario be renamed. It’s named after Mohawk leader Joseph Brant, isn’t it? A guy who owned 30-40 *African* slaves?

          1. You do know there was no Canada before July 1, 1867, yes?
            If you’re going to be an ankle biter at least bite my ankles rather than some strawman of your own making.

        2. But you certainly had an economy that profited from it — your economy was created by servicing the slave plantations of the South and Caribbean. So…Canada has a vested interest in keeping it going.

          So for all your chest pumping about your noble, non-slaver country…slavery somewhere else benefitted you….and you were just fine with that.

      2. The “blood soaked commodities” paper looks like a crock of shit. Because we had little slavery we are morally deficient for trading with slave states over 200 years ago? Looks like somebody tailored a paper to prove some pet point.

        1. Often forgotten (or hidden) is the fact that the Arab world was deeply involved in the slave trade and that continued well into the 20th Century. In fact, almost 20 million slaves were taken. But then Muslims are now the protected ones of the lunatic left.

        2. If Canada had “no slaves” … it’s because you grew no commodity crops that required cheap, plentiful, labor to harvest. Not to mention hardly any people lived there at all … Please make a note of it

          1. They don’t want to countenance the fact that their country benefited economically from slavery because they want to be superior to us awful Yankees Kenji.
            We’re the baddies; they are virtuous.

          2. We’ve all been so bad Kenjji, so very, very bad.
            That apparently we need to be lectured to by a bunch of virtue signaling Canadian Karens about our moral failings, our inadequacies, our horrid rahcismus. Oh why oh why can we not be more like our superior northern neighbors!?!
            To which I say:
            Get out that blue hair dye and stick a nose ring in it! You’re fooling no one!

            *I should probably qualify this with “not all Canadians”, but quite a few, and you know who you are. Nose ring, get it in there.

        3. Get mad all you like, but if certain of you are going to get on your moral high horse with my country about the Slavery/Racisms!!!! issue…then I get to point out the hypocrisy of it all.

          I won’t be lectured about “oooh evil (white) Americans, slavery, rahcists!!!!” from a country that got a triangulated economic benefit from said slavery. That’s all.
          Just own up to the fact that while you didn’t have slavery, your country’s founding seed money was connected to slavery in other areas — don’t try to use it as a moral cudgel against my own country. It’s that simple.

          1. Ah ha ha, you are both nailing the snooty superiority of the vast majority of the snow Mexicans, Kenji and Jane!

            So often I have to grit my teeth at the little remarks they constantly make about how dumb and coarse Americans are when they don’t know you’re American.

          2. Not ironically your screen name is ‘friendly’ … I can only imagine how those snooty effete Canadians ‘identify’ …

            I side with the friendly folks

    2. “Only government in North America with more racism is the US”?

      Great job of highlighting how you write on subjects you know little about, considering you appear unaware that the Dominican Republic exists.

    3. How does my President (or my country) benefit from having a basket case on our northern, and longest, border?
      Ooooh, he’s taking advantage of us and making mean tweets!
      Ooooh, he’s making the best of a bad situation — your country was a basket case long before he came into power; the cracks are just beginning to show. Like using immigration to create an inflated GDP for instance.

      1. “How does my President benefit”

        Well, Donald Trump did state that he thought it was easier to deal with the Liberals than the Conservatives.
        He said it before our election. I watched the video and heard him say it. What he meant I do not know.
        Does he still think so? I do not know. What I do know is that he’ll never admit he does anything wrong.
        Ever.

        1. “I watched the video and heard him say it. What he meant I do not know.”

          I’m going to guess that he though Canadian liberals, like their US counterparts, are generally not as smart as conservatives.

          (and before the usual suspects get their panties in a knot, I’m not talking about being ‘educated’…I’m talking about being intelligent and possessing common sense)

        2. Here’s something you need to know: always take Trump seriously, but not literally. He is often trolling, and someone usually takes the bait. Elbows up!

          1. So, you’re saying President Trump is not a plain talker and can’t be trusted?
            That the consequences of what President Trump says are serious; but if people act on his palaver and it goes wrong then President Trump gets to write it off as mere baiting?
            Seems irresponsible to me. Are you sure?

          2. He is acting in what he believes is the best interests of the US. If he can induce an error on the other side of the table, because they reacted emotionally instead of rationally (i.e., in their own best interests), so much the better for his side. Face it, it wasn’t Trump who said, “elbows up.”

        3. Considering how Pollievre has been acting (along with several in your Conservative Party) maybe it’s just better to deal with the problem up front instead of beating around the bush.
          Your Conservatives have been pretty “Elbows Up” themselves — we likely wouldn’t have gotten along any better with them. With the Liberals the timeline just got sped up, which may be to our advantage.

        4. to which l repeat Oz, HE PLAYED CANADUH LIKE A FIDDLE.
          liberals and Liberals FELL FOR IT. clutched at straws, watched CBC for their orders and voila!!! the 1st president EVER to be primarily a hard nosed sarcastic BUSINESSMAN took it upon himself to sacrifice some amount of personal profit to ‘fix’ the nation as best he could in the time he had.
          part of that was pyssing on Liberals for a multitude of reasons. one of them, they parked themselves right under the stream and complained about the yellow rain.
          p.s. before l post, note that noddlehopper ‘gets it’

    4. The TDS is strong with this boomer elbozo, The US would benefit from a strong Canada, able to pay it’s own way and trade on a value for value basis. The fact that Canada is a broke undefended shithole is nothing but a liability for the US.

    5. “well they voted for the color of his skin in a show of racism to prove to everybody how not-racist they all were.”

      Yes, and then Obama proceeded to set race relations in the US back 20 years. Idiots.

      1. 2008 was the FIRST mass-fraud election in the history of the USA. I know, because I witnessed it at my own polling place of the last 40 years.

        Coincident with the FIRST half-black Presidential candidate.

  2. “Canada must implement mandatory conscription and organize weight loss and capabilities training for those that may be a little over the target weight for healthy military members.”
    https://x.com/Jkylebass/status/2095343506906579075
    I don’t disagree with what Kyle Bass is saying, and would like to see this in Canada. It’d be 2x more glorious if we could forward the idea of mandatory conscription weighted more heavily from areas of the country which historically have higher rates of unemployment, the idea being, “well you weren’t doing anything anyways…”

    The above link from “made” linking to National Post re: “Key government jobs, such as safety inspectors and intelligence analysts, being prioritized by race” is terrific. I love it when those tasked with ensuring we’ve “made the grade” are those who only made the grade when their status unrelated to the task at hand was used to gain their employment.

    Was it the E.U. which had a standard for cucumbers stating their curvature had to meet a straightness standard or it wasn’t a cucumber?

    1. Conscription sounds like a great idea. Finally, DND could reach its diversity goals. 50% wahmyn, a good diversity representation forcing foreign scammers and moocher to contribute to society and lots and lots of LGBTQISWERTY to fill the ranks and the tampon distributors. It’s not like DND has Defence as its core business anymore, not since Anand wrecked the place. The Komisssar (Chief Professional Conduct and Culture, our present CDS’ previous job) could oversee the whole shebang to make sure all protected classes are represented.

  3. L – The Canadian road to perdition of a post national state, one infected by a mind virus inducing one of the worst cases of Suicidal Empathy. Prognosis: chances of survival is iffy, at best.

    As for me, “I have sworn on the altar of God, eternal enmity to every tyranny over the mind of man.” T. Jefferson

      1. As a person with both Native and slave ancestresses, no I don’t mind — I rather like my life, which wouldn’t have happened if past events hadn’t transpired.
        Of course it is a history with tragedy and heartbreak (and not just on the POC side, the NPOC had their bad times too, sometimes at the hands of the other side of the familia), but everybody has non-sailboats and noodle salad stories in their family trees.

        FYI: I respect both sides; they certainly didn’t roll over and play dead — their fights against each other have now become legend! (Custer, Harmar, St. Clair! — but in the end the other side of the tree won, they were good fights); self-emancipation! Americans are a great people.
        …that’s better than being turned into somebody’s pets

          1. Y’all? Are you trying to sound Southern now?
            Get off with your mealy-mouthed pandering Canadian.

            Yes, for four years we had to deal with an abject puppet in the form of Biden, an utter humiliation…rather like Trudeau (how long was he in for? oh, and you voted for the same party right after him!) Don’t talk to me about being a pet…weakling.

          2. “Yes, for four years we had to deal with an abject puppet in the form of Biden”

            Y’all were his pets, abject puppets, chew toyz for 4 years. YeHaw!
            8 years with BJ ClinToon, 8 years with Barky the DogEater, and you still ain’t got shed o that guy.
            8 years with “W” Bush who blew up your Twin Towers and started a 20 year war that you lost.

      2. Can you do me a solid and use your time machine to get the winning 649 numbers for next week? Since you must have been there to witness that exact thing happening, and not perhaps Jefferson’s brother who was known to consort with slaves fathering children? Of course you were triggered by a quote against tyranny, maybe that’s enough internet for you today hmmm?

  4. Kyle Bass isn’t making the most coherent argument I’ve ever heard. Canada’s economy has underperfomed over the last ten years, therefore China is benefitting? He’s going to have to provide more details than that.

        1. “So Bass doesn’t have to make a cogent argument…blah blah blah…”

          I already know what he said is the case, from a thousand other sources. I’ve seen it before. On TV even. CNBC nailed #DominicLeblanc to the table over it last week, left him sputtering.

          Canadian economy, flat for ten years. Flat at best, there’s an argument to be made that we’re losing serious ground in after-tax earnings and spending power. American economy, growing for ten years. Growing -bigly- for six of those ten, less so for the 4 years of #Let’sGoBrandon. Plenty of places to see that graph, lots of data to show it.

          Or I could look out the window at all the failed businesses and closed shops around Ontario. Different sort of confirmation. Not to mention many/most of the outfits still going are money laundering operations. Laundering Chinese money, not to put too fine a point on it. Billions of dollars. Lots of sources for that as well.

          Meanwhile, you feign ‘reasonable argument’ while pretending that an assertion like “the sun rises in the East and sets in the West” requires astronomical proof and a PhD. Which is both unreasonable and untrue. All you have to do is look out the window. Even a dog can see it.

          Sealion.

      1. “it is known”
        ~character on Game of Thrones

        Seriously though, after all of the lies that we told about AGW and Covid from the experts, “the work” is not more reliable than “it is known”.

          1. ““The work” is precisely what you should be focusing on.”

            If I look out the window and see one thing, but “the work” as presented by the mammal is telling me the opposite, I know which I’m going to believe.

    1. Yes China is benefiting. By subsidized manufacturing and then dumping those products into other countries to unfairly compete with local manufacturers. In fact, it is the goal of belt and road. And Canada has fallen for it and continues to do so with the idiotic concept of bringing Chinese EV’s into the country.

      automakers, desperate to meet their sales targets in a bitterly competitive market, sell cars to dealerships, which register them as “sold,” even though no actual customer has bought them. Dealers, stuck with officially sold cars, then offload them as “used,” often at low prices. The practice has become so prevalent that the Chinese Communist Party is trying to stop it. Its main newspaper, The People’s Daily, complained earlier this year that this sales-inflating tactic “disrupts normal market order,” and criticized companies for their “data worship.”

      This sign of serious problems in China’s electric-vehicle industry may come as a surprise to many Americans. The Chinese electric car has become a symbol of the country’s seemingly unstoppable rise on the world stage. Many observers point to their growing popularity as evidence that China is winning the race to dominate new technologies. But in China, these electric cars represent something entirely different: the profound threats that Beijing’s meddling in markets poses to both China and the world.”

      The Atlantic, Nov 11, 2025

        1. See: China’s Ghost cities.

          It’s actually quite like Wind Power in the West. A few people get very wealthy when the things get built, by mining the government subsidies, institutional investors, and bank loans … then the blades stop turning … and never start up ever again.

          Lots of money into a few pockets to build things nobody needs or want.

        2. China’s social contract with their people was “let us be in total control, we’ll get you out of poverty”. Historically China has always had a problem with falling apart domestically. Their economic model means they have to keep producing, and they have no real domestic market so that means exports. Of course they’re going to take every advantage to continue to do so.

        3. “I’m still a little baffled by China’s actions.”

          That’s because you think they’re in it for the money.

          They’re not. They are -communists-. They will sacrifice profit, the environment, and the people of China to gain control. Because that’s what they want.

          If the whole Chinese car industry goes bust and they poison the whole Yangtze River valley from source to mouth, but they manage to put GM out of business and hurt the Americans? They’ll consider that a huge success.

          Communists. Don’t forget.

        4. BB
          I had a customer who’s company sold band saw blades to Can Tire, and lost money on each sale. But factored into the original price was about 8 cents for over head costs. So if they were loosing 2 cents on every sale, those sales were still covering 6 cents of over head. So that, and contract obligations prevented them from telling CT to shove it.
          As to Chinese cars, they are selling ‘carbon’ credits to western auto manufacturers, driving up western costs, while allowing Chinese manufacturers to sell at a lower price, and that’s how they do it!

  5. That’s a deceptive way to graph the nominal GDP of the two countries. Because the absolute GDP of Canada is a fraction of the US, it’s hard to compare the growth of the two. A logarithm scale might have allowed comparison, or having both countries start from 100% in 2009.

    1. Killer unME alla S
      Maybe you should lear(sp, intentional, OK antwat colon/) , you are to stupid to process what you see. You’v proven that fact in here numerous times.

      1. Come now, if he has ten fingers he can handle all the numbers he needs. Of course, God knows if he still has all his fingers. There’s a lot of snappy rectums out there.

    2. “it’s hard to compare the growth of the two”

      Well, one has had growth and the other has had no growth in 11 years (since the liberals came to power).

      From 2014 to 2024, Canada’s real GDP per capita adjusted for purchasing power parity grew by just 3.2 percent in total, an anemic 0.4 percent per year on average, and the third lowest among 38 advanced nations. Over the same period, the United States posted 20.2 percent total growth (1.9 percent annually), and the OECD average reached 15.3 percent (1.4 percent annually). The measurement shortcomings cannot explain five-to six-fold differences in growth rates.

      1. When I said “it’s hard to compare the growth of the two”, I was talking about the poor presentation of the data. I’m well aware that the US significantly out performed Canada in GDP growth.

    3. “That’s a deceptive way to graph the nominal GDP of the two countries. Because the absolute GDP of Canada is a fraction of the US, it’s hard to compare the growth of the two.”

      GDP per capita looks even worse.

    4. You’re right; a log scale would have been better. Still, the graph shows the US GDP just about doubled since 2009, while Canada had maybe a 50% increase.

    5. Yes, chart the rate of increase.

      The USA has more than doubled its already massive GDP over that time frame while Canada has barely singled its fractional GDP.

  6. It would appear that Texas has a GDP per person that’s 60% greater than Canada.

    In truth, it’s about 30% once purchasing power parity (PPP) is taken into account. This is because goods are cheaper in Canada than Texas when measured in a common currency.

    Thus the US dollar is overvalued compared to the Canadian dollar when considered from a PPP point of view, perhaps because it’s the global currency. A sharp drop in the value of the greenback versus the loony would magically make Canadians look richer.

    1. What currency is the backstop of the Canadian one? Now, second question, what currency serves as the primary currency asset for Canada?
      But I’m going to say ok, you’re right. We really shouldn’t compare Canada to the U.S. Let’s consider how the Canadian economy is doing on it’s own:
      https://www.rbc.com/en/economics/canadian-analysis/data-flashes/canadian-gdp/
      On your own metrics (let’s not bring my country into this), you aren’t doing great, not awful, but not great. Where there is potential improvement is up to conjecture.

      1. Of course we should compare the US to Canada. But there’s many ways to do it, and they all have weaknesses. Nominal GDP doesn’t fully address how much the average citizen can buy with their paycheque, and is heavily influenced by currency exchange rates.

        So far as the rest, you seem to be rebutting things I never claimed. At least I think so. It was a bit incoherent.

        1. Ok, well, it looks like you don’t even do as well as California, which has similar problems with socialist lite government issues and a similar population (as Victor Davis Hanson pointed out). Your per capita GDP is similar to Mississippi’s, one of our poorest states. If I look at, for example, Vancouver to New York, the PPP converts to $50,000 Vancouver aligns with $40,000 New York.

          I tried to meet you on let’s just look at Canada by itself, and you didn’t like that much either because it points to your country not doing well just by its own metrics.
          By the way, you didn’t answer my questions.

          I will try to find some economic measure that makes you happy, but unfortunately I can’t find one at the moment. Maybe it’s just me being incoherent — my sincere apologies.

          1. And to answer my own questions: Canada’s currency might at first look better vs. the U.S. dollar if the greenback fell in value, but it would only do this for a brief period (very brief)So:
            1. because of the U.S. trade, Canada needs it, and they need a weaker loonie to dollar to encourage that trade
            2. the Canadian dollar is a full fiat currency, no physical backing, and without trade, it collapses; investors wouldn’t be rushing to buy it — there might be a fire sale on your natural resources though
            3. the majority of Canadian liquid foreign currency reserves are U.S. dollars

            So, no, you really aren’t going to benefit from a drop in U.S. dollar valuation or market assets drop. You might look richer for about a millisecond, but only slightly.

          2. You seem to be looking for an argument, but you’re all over the map.

            The point I was making is that the situation isn’t as bad for Canada as it seems. Comparing nominal GDP is useful, but has weaknesses. If Trump gets his wish for a devaluation of the US dollar, some of that apparent difference disappears. Comparing PPP is more revealing.

    2. And did you include tax rates in your “purchasing power” argument because there is no State tax in Texas. After all, people live off their net….not their gross. Furthermore, sales taxes in Texas are less than in Canada.

      1. Sales taxes are less in Texas, but property taxes are higher. Comparing tax rates are tricky because different jurisdictions rely on different forms of taxes and have different tax rates.

        Comparing taxes in British Columbia to Texas would likely be in Texas’s favour. Comparing Alberta to California would likely be in Alberta’s favour.

    3. Wait. Canada housing is more affordable than American housing!? Really? How about you focus on core consumer needs? Gasoline is cheaper than the average Red State cost of $3.66/gal.? Food is cheaper in Canada? Really!? And your dikk is bigger too?

  7. regarding the 5 million mentioned in the ‘making sense’ link, if, IF that figure cd be attributed to
    a
    single
    individual,
    who might that be? none other that justink turdeau perhaps? follow up Q,
    WHO put him in the PMO that he could *do* that?
    CanaDUH demands to be torn to pieces from the inside. DEMANDS to reach the point-of-no-return asap.
    as such count me out. lm just here for the entertainment.

    1. “And trade with the US is the main problem? Sure.”

      Socialism has taken a proud and prosperous Canada and turned us into worse than Mexico. And they have done so deliberately.

      Mexico is literally doing better than us this year, and has a bigger military.

        1. “Either to deal with the drug cartels or to fight the U.S….”

          A) The cartels own the Mexican government. That’s -their- army.
          B) China is a very big reason why that is the case.
          C) The government of Mexico is -never- going to war with the USA. They will knuckle under and “cooperate” with any anti-cartel enforcement the USA sees fit to undertake. Because you can’t make any money from a US jail cell.

          #Laurentians should think hard about C. The Americans wouldn’t even have to parachute in, they could just drive over from New York and arrest whoever they want.

    2. No one said trade with the US is the main problem. Rather the opposite. Increasing barriers to trade are now a major problem, for all countries including the US.

      1. Hasn’t impacted me one iota. Sorry, but as with all things Canada … we don’t even notice. Sorry. That’s the truth. The SAME truth that a ‘true conservative’ in Canada sounds an awful lot like a wild-eyed ChiCom Marxist here in America.

    1. From the article: “I wonder how much of all this Canadian voters are aware of, particularly since most of them are depending on the domestic press, as I was. Likely, not many.”

      Most of the things in the article I either assumed from indirect inference or knew about. Nice to have investigative evidence to back up my assumptions.

      Canadian voters appear not to know much of anything, honestly. The Elbozos just won three by-elections. Propaganda and sheer lying seem to be pretty powerful things, eh?

  8. I have concerns about the political climate in Canada. It feels as though some strongly anti‑conservative factions are so focused on undermining the MAGA‑aligned conservative movement that they may be overlooking the broader consequences of escalating hostility.

    If polarization continues to intensify, it could create conditions where China gains greater influence in Canada. I’m not saying this isn’t already happening to some degree, but sustained internal antagonism makes external leverage more likely over time.

    My worry is that certain anti‑conservative groups might support policies that inadvertently strengthen China’s position simply because those policies weaken Canadian or MAGA‑aligned conservatives. That kind of spite‑driven politics could have serious long‑term implications.

    I don’t want this outcome. But the more aggressive and alienating the rhetoric becomes, the more plausible it becomes.

    Canada’s conservative movement needs stability and constructive engagement — including support from American allies — not continued provocation and factional escalation at home that encourages poor decisions from anti‑conservative or Liberal factions.

    1. This question is for Killer Marmot – Could you please show us a comparison between the USA and Canada which shows Canada having a superior and improving economy compared to the USA.

      At the same time can you explain why this is happening –
      “The velocity of this capital flight is breathtaking. In May, (Canadian) investors poured a record $14.2-billion into U.S. equities. That same month, foreign investors sold off $11.4-billion in Canadian shares, a massive monthly capital flight from our productive economy.” as quoted in one of the articles in Kate’s post?
      Is your nest egg 100% in the Canadian market?

      1. Good move Canadian investors … as American markets have made what? Like 81 all time highs since Trump took office? Dow 38k to 54k roughly

        BTW … DOW UP +600+ points +1.2% today.

        1. “Good move Canadian investors … as American markets have made what? Like 81 all time highs since Trump took office? Dow 38k to 54k roughly”

          This is probably the major reason that Mark Carney has the vast majority of his wealth in the USA, and not Canada.

          Brookfield reportedly has 580+ investments, but only 3 of them in Canada. 97% of his money is in the United States (where his wife and his adult children live).

          He really has no vested interest in the health of the Canadian economy, which explains the “Elbows Up!” idiocy he invested to get himself elected as PM.

  9. “More recently, Carney delivered the closing keynote at a closed-door Global Progress Action Summit in Toronto, sharing a stage with Barack Obama, Alex Soros — George’s son, now chairman of OSF — John Podesta, Pete Buttigieg, and Sen. Elissa Slotkin.”

    Gee I wonder why trade negotiations broke down before the mid terms…

  10. Not to throw wood on the fire, but Chinese automaker BYD Co. inquired about taking over an idled Stellantis NV assembly plant in Brampton, Ontario, to potentially manufacture electric buses. Stellantis NV closed up in 2023, and used to build Dodge vehicles. China, actually, made overtures six months ago to take over the plant. And, if you’re familiar with how China operates, it would be very limited jobs for Canadians, because their foreign soil manufacturing deals always include bringing in their own workforce for the most part. There’s no deal at the present, but when the USMCA dissipates (likely very shortly), a deal will be struck.

    China wants to make their vehicles in Canada, and then sell them to the EU listing them as Canadian made. That’s how China rolls.

  11. Anyways, don’t worry about all of this, folks. Pierre “Tiger” Poilievre has our backs on this. Yessiree! Li’l Pee-pee is just waiting for the right opportunity to stand up and shout out that Carney is a traitor who is selling us down the Yellow River to the chicomms.

    Just bide your time a bit. It has to be the right moment. You know, like when the media is onside with him. Just waiting for that day …

  12. Heh,arguing about who are the best racists?
    The USA has not had State Run Apartheid for over 100 years.
    Can Ahh Duh wins .
    See we are BETTER than the USA at something..
    Elbows Up.
    Death to those poor brown subjects.
    As usual,every accusation from our progressive comrades..is their confession.

Leave a Reply

Navigation