One down, one to go.
“For more than 20 years under their ownership, Ben & Jerry’s stood up and spoke out in support of peace, justice and human rights, not as abstract concepts, but in relation to real events happening in our world,” he wrote. “That independence existed in no small part because of the unique merger agreement Ben and I negotiated with Unilever, one that enshrined our social mission and values in the company’s governance structure in perpetuity. It’s profoundly disappointing to come to the conclusion that that independence, the very basis of our sale to Unilever, is gone.”
That’s excellent news. Nothing to be sad about.
Never tried their over-priced shit. Never will.
Is Ben the morbidly obese one? Hard to tell them apart.
I must admit … ‘Cherry Garcia’ … is brilliant marketing. Meh. It’s black cherry ice cream … but with such a deadhead name … there’s nothing better for the munchies, eh?
https://youtu.be/5yJmBC7cMTM?si=-9NYtVBFmUm2tny2
Live by the political sword, die by the political sword. Only progressives bought their ice cream.
I’m proud to say I have never eaten their filthy social justice product.
Lie down with hippies, wake up with fleas. // Suing for terrorists.
It is so nice that they sued the parent organization, so fully in the spirit of “Coexist”.
“In November, Ben & Jerry’s sued Unilever in federal court in New York, accusing it of silencing Ben & Jerry’s statements in support of Palestinians in the Gaza war.”
My hippie joke:
A hippie is someone who makes soap, but doesn’t use it.
Wow man … that’s farrr out.
Stick to making ice cream. If pressed for a stance on any social issue, standard response should be “No comment.”
Seems to me that Unilever mirrors all their positions. So I don’t know what his problem is.