The Perfect Solution for Lieberal Boomers

Baiting The Left The Libranos 32 Comments

Remember all of those videos at the last Canadian election of Liberal Party supporters doing the chicken dance and insisting that Mark Carney was the new saviour of Canada?! Well, with the rampant housing crisis in Canada, it now seems perfectly clear that these same people MUST accept new immigrants into their spacious, but mostly empty homes.

32 Replies to “The Perfect Solution for Lieberal Boomers”

    3. And in those rich communities, all living rooms, rec rooms, family rooms, basements can be filled with bunk beds.

  2. It looks like a people are mismanaging their government. Not that we’re any better.

  3. Hahahahaha. (Gains composure, cleans up spilled coffee, clears throat)
    Hahahahaha.

    Never forget that image of Mark Carney chicken flopping at his celebration party with his gross androgynous “wife” (??).

    This probably is on the books for Canada.

  4. are they aware in my Liberal town there is a suspicion de ‘autorities’ have issued an edict from on high’ to the conSTABulary to eschew and refrain from ANY involvement in rental accomodation issues? aka YOU CANT GET RID OF THEM?
    aaaaaand naturally being gossips they are, the loophole now is, well, *if theyre glued to the inside of you home, no further rent payments are necessary*.
    a major contributing factor l whittled my inventory down to a measly . . . . . 2 of them from a high of five (usual attrition).
    in 2022 2 weeks before my reverse mtg kicked in, (speaking of kicking), a particularly nasty one kicked in 2 interior slab doors, put a rock thru my front aluminum door and damaged the shed door with me barricaded inside.
    upon arrival 14 hours after the 911 call, the polite occifer (the one with a smirk on his face) chalked it up to (exact quote) “occupancy rights”.
    hmmm. apparently a rent receipt exempts them from the criminal code? yup !!!
    p.s. in blubber dougie’s ontariowe, the RTA residential tenancy act (section 5) does NOT apply to rooming houses aka shared accomodation. ie the protections therein are NOT available to rooming houses.
    skill testing question: take a guess why l detest those WORSE than useless smarmy prycks with an unprecedented fury. shucksamighty lve been known when any of them get ‘in the news’ (if ya know whut l mean) to give that jurisdiction a ringy dingy, share with *them* how uproariously funny their colleagues here find stolen property, and how much much ‘funnier’ it is *their* colleague THERE is ‘bye bye’. gasp!! the outrage!! (but none regarding my dilemma eh chief??)
    cops are the most powerful civilian organization in the country and as such are now the absolute worst bullies lve ever dealt with.
    in the midst of the last tenant ‘to do’ l asked them ‘what if my mastiff bit the interloper lm trying to get OUT?’ came the reply ‘then we will seize the dog for being aggressive and PUT IT DOWN.’ (echos of Lindsay ON? punish the VICTIM?? YUP!!!)

    cops are NOT your friend. ie the ones in britain, well google ‘bacon arrest’

    this just in!!! first showing tuesday at 3 !!!

    to be continued . . .

  5. Well, just call yourself a pet boarding business and assign your pets to a bedroom. Don’t like dogs or cats? Fine, just get a goldfish–one for each unoccupied bedroom. What? You can’t do that with your own pets? Fine, go in with your neighbors. They keep your fish and you keep theirs.

  6. Every day, it doesn’t matter what the conversation is about, a fellow BOOMER has to blurt out “OrangeManBad”.

    We could be discussing at what length to cut your grass, and here it comes……..

  7. Many of them hate dogs, I’m not a fan of dogs either, but I’ll get dogs before I get immigrants.

  8. How do you define a bedroom? Since there is only two of us in our house, we have in addition to the normal rooms, an office with my computer and 3D printer, my wife’s sewing and quilting room and our exercise space.

    We only have one bedroom.

    1. I think it has to have a door that closes and a window that meets legal emergency egress requirements.

    2. Such creative solutions will work for a while, then they’ll hire additional bureaucrats who will arbitrarily decree how many bedrooms there are, plus additional bureaucrats to staff an appeal board, which will create jobs for lawyers, plus more bureaucrats to control rents of those spare bedrooms (for those who might think to charge $10k/mo) etc .. a total sh*t storm of insanity. Shades of the UK window tax of 1696 whose dumb effects are still visible (bricked-up windows) on some old buildings today. Of course, they never learn.

  9. People can’t have out-of-town family visits anymore?
    At some point in time, hangings will become A Thing.

  10. Just one more reason to leave this mentally ill country for a more sane existence.

    I have three bedrooms … one for me, one for my spouse (a snoring issue) and one for the many guests who visit regularly .. sooooo no FN Wogs are moving into my home. This idea is utter madness. It must end NOW!

  11. What I was saying 12 days ago, on BCF:

    Next move from NDP/Librano$ mayors will be to send new bylaw:

    “Based on our data you have far too much sq footage only for you and your spouse. You can keep it this way BUT have to pay double property taxes OR you can accept Ahmed, his two wives and 6 siblings renting your extra-space.”

    1. Didn’t the USSR use square footage to determine how many people lived in your “free” communist apartment?

      1. Yeah, I know very well (born and raised in Communist E Europe, my 1st 23 yrs). You had to be in a loong queue + be approved by a Communist Party local boss to have a crappy apartment with rationed water/electricity + hot water 1hr in the morning and 2hrs in the evening. Approval was always conditioned by fat bribes (money and/or produce) to that fat apparatchik.

        1. what??? a form of, gasp!!! CAPITALISM embedded right in the heart of communist housing??? egadfry if only Stalin (ably assisted by Levrenti Beria) was still around he could make the arrangement ‘moot’. if ya know whut l mean . . . .

  12. Betrayed By Both Sides – Uniparty Disasters and Why They Need Your Spare Rooms – UK Example

    Home Office bigwigs have been caught taking home bumper pay rises and bonuses – just as the number of migrants crossing the Channel passed 50,000 under Labour.
    Some of the department’s most influential civil servants and top-ranking Border Force officials are earning salaries as high as £260,000 – almost seven times the median UK wage.
    Home Office Second Permanent Secretary Simon Ridley: £170,000-175,000 after a £5,000 pay rise;
    Border Force Director-General Philip Douglas: £140,000-145,000 after a £5,000 pay rise, plus £10,000-£15,000 bonuses;
    Director General of the Migration and Borders Group at the Home Office, Daniel Hobbs: £130,000-£135,000 after a £5,000 pay rise;
    Ex-Home Office Permanent Secretary Sir Matthew Rycroft: £255,000-260,000 after a staggering £50,000 pay rise.
    Reform UK’s Lee Anderson, meanwhile, told the Express: “If they were working in the private sector, they’d be sacked.
    “They shouldn’t be getting any rises or bonuses. They are failing.”
    However, one source in the department pointed out how “most” of the pay rises were set under the Conservatives.
    Migrant crisis: Home Office bigwigs handed mega pay rises while illegal migrant arrivals skyrocket
    https://www.gbnews.com/politics/migrant-crisis-home-office-staff-pay-rises

    1. Yes comrade, this is a more ‘just’ arrangement.

      ‘Restorative Justice’ on full display

  14. We’ve come a long way since Pierre Trudeau campaigned on “a just society”. Equal misery for all replacing unequal distribution of prosperity.

  15. Those “spare” bedrooms are my grandson’s and granddaughter’s primary bedrooms … just like Letitia James and Adam Schiff have multiple “primary” residences.

  16. Carney’s cottage has 22 rooms.
    Governor General’s house has 175 rooms.

    They can start with them.

  17. Soon we’ll be at the point where a canuck version of the French Revolution is an appealing solution for all left-wing politicians.

    We could keep the tumbrels and tribunals but forget the guillotines: that’s too quick. Better to strip them of all their assets and property and turn them out on the streets. Wouldn’t it be a blast to see marxist carnage, juthtin or witch-hags freeland and chow panhandling on the corner? I could wake up every day a happy canuck at that.

    Although many would say redistribute the libscum assets (as attractive that’d be) I’m no commie; I’d say convert it to cash and burn it publicly. That way we aren’t doing what these lowlifes have done for years and it sends a better message: we value them and their assets so little we’d not even steal from them as they’ve done to Canadians for the past 60+ years.

    I can dream.

    mhb23re

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation