Things You’re Gonna See On The CBC

25 Replies to “Things You’re Gonna See On The CBC”

1. Let’s start with:
   Opinions are like arseholes, everyone has one.

   1. We can extend that: everyone else’s is more offensive than mine.

2. The Pravda has been reborn. Up next, gulags and struggles sessions for the unbelievers.

   1. Intelligence has been redefined as … narcissism
      Skepticism has been redefined as … psychopathy
      Investigation has been redefined as … machiavellianism

3. Believe in climate change as being cause by CO2?

   High correlation with Communism, Socialism and scientific ignorance.

   How do we know about the ignorant part? The Germans did a study of its own people and found that the less one knew about climatology and science in general the more likely you believed in global warming.

   The Communism/Socialism part? Just watch Greta Thunberg, the poster child for hatred of Western Civilization.

4. They got the headline right. Gullibility and stupidity are personality traits.
   After that they’re projecting.

5. I am not surprised at the results or the spin the CBC would try to give it.
   The people with the personality traits they are slamming are the over achievers and high IQ members of society. While those supporting the CBC stance are the gullible go along with the majority obedient serfs. The writers of the paper should know this, but they will never say it if they do. They are social scientists so come from the “barely above average” intelligence group.

6. Is this satire? This article is so over the top that it couldn’t be anything else.
   They then finish it by not allowing any comments. Which I suppose saves time.
   The CBC used go through the comments and erase the ones they didn’t like.
   This is what our tax dollars pay for.

7. $10 says that the learned professor is gay, voted Liberal and doesn’t own a vehicle or if he does it’s electric.

8. After winning the election that they fought by keeping the issues as mindless as possible to gain support of the mindless mushy middle (MMM), the media pundits have returned to blatant projection in their smears of their political enemies. In the deranged dominion, even their electable enemies feel the need to self flagellate by cowing to the unfree press that sway the MMM.

9. The climate is always changing.
   Only half-wits think something other than the sun is the cause.
   The CBC is a parody.

10. We just hit 430 PPM of CO2, which is historically low.

11. Writing brainless hitpieces like that makes one rank higher on the scale of mendacity, stupidity, and lack of ethics.

12. I have a real simple fix for this:

    A @ cbc.ca 127.0.0.1

    I finally implemented this during “Covid” when blatant hypocrisy respecting how they censored discussion on their site became too ridiculous to fathom. Now their entire site, and all their mewling nonsense is dead to me.

13. No doubt, the assembly of the 1984 ‘experts’ will come up with bullshit and then insist that everybody, those nonexperts submit.
    Unfortunately the majority that are most of the population of the NPCs will.
    As it seems today, there is no stopping them, short of an asteroid.

14. Klimate Kultists are so gullible, which is probably why they left that trait off the list.

15. They cannot counter the facts that skeptics present so they resort to ad hominems. This is to be expected, it’s typical of the left, a common tactic used to avoid the facts. Basically it’s an admission that the “deniers” are right.

16. As of today Calgary will again poison its citizens by contaminating its reservoir with fluoride. So one of the last conservative hold-outs will have their childrens’ IQs lowered.

    Increasing the likelihood that they’ll also fall for the climate change scam.

    1. Gondek is a true believer. First thing she did was declare a climate emergency.

17. Narcissists believe that they can control the climate. Now THAT’S narcissism!

    Seems that the biggest lies always begin with “a recent study shows that…..”

18. I only read the CBC blurb.
    But having previously attempted to access “the science” I am confident that the Dear Professor did not define “Climate Change” for the purposes of his study.
    They never do.
    Which is a tell.
    Science,actually using the scientific method, requires that one defines the “thing” they pretend to study.
    The Cult of Calamitous Climate flatly refuses to do so.
    “The Science” as we were reminded during Dread Covid Theatre, has no definitions,no data and no ability to be refuted..
    Dogma.
    Policy Based Evidence Manufacturing.

    What was the name of that appalling Australian phycologist?
    Lewenski?
    For this “assistant professor” appears to be a disciple.
    “All who doubt my divine wisdom,are mentally ill”..Dear Leader has spoken.

    1. Stephan Lewandowsky, psychologist. Along with academic buddy John Cook have produced academically dubious papers in support of the alarmist climate change narrative. It seems to be that social and behavioural “scientists”, at least those of good standing in today’s academic institutions, assume that the alarmist climate change message is 100% true and proved beyond all doubt. It helps that the message is aligned with their progressive leftist philosophy and ambitions. They are totally in with policy based evidence making.

19. Because the science is irrelevant.

20. Anybody else notice that The Marmot didn’t show up for this piece of peer reviewed science published in a reputable journal?

    It’s funny how he selectively ignores things like this, but will bleat “but the Science!” when it supports his little sacred cow.

    1. Hey, he can’t be everywhere. He is wise to be discreet on this one, and we should be grateful for his wisdom.