Guilty Until Proven Innocent

This testimony by Trudeau is insane, but not surprising:

“Intelligence” doesn’t mean “facts”, it means suspicions. How much more damage is this depraved clown going to do to Canada?

Update: Justin also defamed Jordan Peterson and Tucker Carlson.

43 Replies to “Guilty Until Proven Innocent”

  1. The Communist Party of China is laughing at their little potato, that’s worth a few bucks to them, they’ll keep throwing it his way.

  2. And he is deflecting by saying that he has names (plural) of Conservative MP’s who are in the pocket of India.

  3. Apart for PM Baked Potato being out of his depth in a puddle what damage is he doing? Really “F… India” should be a long standing policy anyway. The moron is unintentionally doing something good here.

    Anyway, why are Maxipads complaining about the leader they helped electing?

  4. On another positive note one can finally use the words “Intelligence” and “Trudeau” in one sentence, so there is that.

    1. Trudeau often displays a complete lack of intelligence.

      There, did it. Where do I collect my prize?

  5. I knew that jessica the COLON may just post in this thread, as he/she/they /them/it is a brain dead imbecile, and racist scum bag.

    1. heck ya.
      he does damage willfully for some objective he thinks is good.
      he does damage willfully out of spite.
      he does damage unintentionally
      he does damage as collateral damage with the above.
      he does damage without ever knowing it
      he does damage with no one ever knowing it, its so pervasive.

      did l miss any?

  6. Oh Goody! Intelligenth!

    Do you suppose it’s from the same source and as reliable as the Intelligence about the Coutts Boys?

  7. just[inTURDeau] got off the phone to the local LIEberal mp suggesting, recommending and advising liberals everywhere tell the PM to STFU anything about India ‘hes just making it worse’

  8. Time for the Gropenfurher to get back to quantum physics and perhaps he can figure out Pi, to the 19th Decibel

  9. Dr Peterson’s ship has come in.
    things rarely happen for one reason.
    let’s hope that Jordan successfully pursues this to what is best for him and that it works out that way. and make it personal, TURDeau himself. keep the gubbamint out.

  10. I think Dr. Jordan Peterson personally cross examining The Turd should be on whatever has replaced “pay per view”

    and I do expect The Turd to lash out more as the clock counts down to election time.

      1. Indeed, but look closer: a little cleaner and less traffic caused by aggressive imbeciles with delusions of Fast and Furious.

  11. This is what you get for electing an immature bad-tempered communist with very low intellectual capacity but who is photogenic and politically well-connected.

  12. It’s too bad the Canadian Justice system is broken. No judge will find the Turd guilty of defamation or anything else.

    1. Unfortunately, parliamentary privilege extends to committees covers civil liability. So unless it’s done in a US court, it wouldn’t even be tried.

  13. A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It’s a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it’s because it’s proven.

    Jean Chretien

    1. Trudeau is in a long loine of Liberal Bullshitters. Remember Trudeau Pere’s election slogan “The Land is Strong”.

  14. Does he not have adivsors? Or did they think it not important as it appears to heve been in French and no one but the French can speak French?

  15. Trudeau seems to think Peterson’s message of “take care of and respect yourself” is destabilizing “democracy”?

    And Russia is paying him to do it?

    Weird choice.

    I’m sure Trudeau’s lawyers will claim parliamentary privilege for his words.

  16. Remember the trip when Justhin tripped out in India and tried to put Indian the Indians? Yeah he made a fool of himself then and in true Liberal fashion has blamed India ever since. Not to mention which he needed a cover to keep the liberal caucus revolt out of the newspapers. A twofer in his mind. Everyone else can see through it.

  17. Why did Canada give citizenship to a terrorist trying to split apart a supposedly “friendly” country, an important country like India?

    Don’t answer that, it was rhetorical.

    1. And the guys that bkew up an airplane?
      And the other “Canadian” guy from Afghanistan?
      You know, those peoples!

Navigation