It would be nice if the media asked Kamala Harris if she is fine with this:
American Stasi: Tulsi Gabbard Confirms "Quiet Skies" Nightmare
Placed on a terror list, the former Hawaii congresswoman and her husband were tailed by Air Marshals and bomb dogs. "Unconstitutional on every level," she says. "And I'm not the only one."https://t.co/sziu9pQm3D pic.twitter.com/Q0c930btWi— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) August 7, 2024
Matt Taibbi’s reporting is usually credible.
These people are sick.
Much need ad.
Click and go …
ABrain
A war on terror tool 🙂 .. Ends up being a multi tool to do all kinds of jobs.. This agency is not going to get smaller as it goes along.. All we need is a new enemy..
Quiet Skies program.
Let’s analyze this.
Does not the term sound warm and fuzzy?
Well, yes, the bottom feeders come up with terminology that sez (sic) one thing while the purpose is exact opposite.
One can look at history of the past century and find parallels with Gestapo, the KGB, the Stasi and other variety and sundry of elements that were created to impose totalitarian control of the fascist state over the plebeians, while telling them that it is for their own good.
You think it can’t happen in Canada or the US?
Well there was a time that it was unthinkable.
One would submit that the current regimes find it very practical for their purposes.
Of course this is not limited to North America, look at Brittain, the socialist prime minister with fascist tendencies is warning the plebeians that he is going to bust them and put them in jail to calm them down.
World is changing at an ever more feverish pace.
It will be interesting to sees if the population is going to go along, one is thinking, yes.
A few years from now, as it seems, there will be totalitarian dicktatorship (sic) in many formerly western democratic countries. As a contrast those that lived under the communist dicktatorship (sic) are so far refusing to submit and are being damned for it by the mass media cartel.
As one can observe, the politicians and the mass media cartel are partners that will pass the ball and play difficult observations into the out.
How is it that Gabbard is an enemy of the state now?
This is completely unbelievable.
What the hell is going on?
As for the Quiet Skies hoodlums, I are, heh, not planning to fly any time soon.
“Completely unbelievable.”
Hell yes. A few days ago I sent a piece about it from an obscure website to an old friend. After much backing and forthing we kinda came to the conclusion that it was probably not true. And I’m a notorious cynic when it comes to gubmint.
But really: by the modern Obama-Dems it’s actually completely believable, consistent with so much prior by-any-means-necessary behaviour.
Revenge against a “traitor”.
Wait, isn’t “criminalizing your political opponents” what Donad Trump is going to do if re-elected?
The iron law of projection
That’s what the people who are currently doing this say. They’re great at doing every nefarious thing of which they acuse others.
I really really really hate these people. I’ll leave it at that …. for now.
Western Governments on the whole have gone, IMO, Full on Gestapo/NAZI like.
I include the country I live in…CANADA.
Pretty sure that somewhere, my name & most of us regulars are on some list…
Well a former CIA agent warned us about this back in ‘01. It was on Crap No-one Needs when it was still a somewhat dependable news source.
“Your candidates”? For the record, we aren’t Democrats therefore not weirdos.
When small minded folks come in contact with others that they don’t understand (us) they often consider us, to be weird.
We alleged weird folks understand the frightened simpletons we are dealing with so we le4t them continue to think we are weird because it scares them.
Gabbard, whose first name refers to a tree sacred to Hindus, fully embraced Hinduism as a teenager, and follows the Vaishnava branch that believes in the Supreme Lord Vishnu, and his 10 primary incarnations. Her primary scripture is the centuries-old Bhagavad Gita, whose themes include selfless action, spirituality, war, and serving God and humanity.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/hawaii-democrat-poised-to-be-elected-first-hindu-in-congress/2012/11/01/65d66cac-245c-11e2-92f8-7f9c4daf276a_story.html
Okay. But she’s not one of them there beach dumpers, eh?
Tulsi is hot. Someone had to say so.
I’ll say it!
Simply put: I love her, I really do. And I can comfortably say this to my wife of 55 years — it’s that kind of wholesome love.
By wipeout I assume you mean more assassination attempts.
So the air marshals and others are just following orders.
Isn’t that swell.
I wonder if any of these Hydra Agents will bring a plain down for the greater good.
The civil war warms each and every day and the only people who are keeping it from turning hot are the conservative libertarians who own almost all the guns.
We’ve heard this before. All of the Nazi accused war criminals at Nuremburg and subsequent criminal proceedings against them claimed “they were just following orders.” And as you remarked, it was “all for the greater good.”
Neuter every possible political threat to decrepit, deceitful, incoherent and incompetent Democrat candidates.
There is a poignant exchange in the film The Breakfast Club
“Why are you being so nice to me?” Allison asks.
“Because you’re letting me,” Claire answers.
So I ask why is the government being turned on its political enemies? Because we are letting them. As Trump said this morning … “we are living in a very sick country”. We HAVE to overturn our government. And Trump is the ONLY vehicle to do that … lest something more radical be employed.
In an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press,” Trump said, “I am very pro-choice. I hate the concept of abortion. … I just believe in choice. Again, it may be a little bit of a New York background, because there is some different attitude in some different parts of the country. … I was raised in New York and grew up and worked and everything else in New York City. But I am strongly pro-choice.”
Asked whether he would ban any abortion, including “partial-birth” abortion, Trump said: “No. I am pro-choice in every respect in as far as it goes. But I just hate it.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trumps-many-abortion-positions-timeline-rcna146601
And your point is what?
Clearly, the USSC has ruled that abortion is a state issue. That means that yes, Trump can have his personal opinion, but he can’t impose it, as the courts have ruled, as it also applies to Cackles and POTUS Pampers.
Thick.
Short answer: he is anti-life
(He also poisoned 250 million Americans at Warp Speed.)
Trump just clarified AGAIN … his personal stance on abortion … in his PRESS conference. His main point? The States … the PEOPLE … are voting on their State’s abortion laws now. That’s ALL the SCOTUS did … which is to rule that The Federal Government has no Right or Law by which to make abortion Law for the entire nation.
Abortion is not a “Civil Right” … it is a medical procedure. Some would say it’s murder. All I can say is that abortion is a disgusting form of birth control. Utterly disgusting. And it is instructive to learn that a highly educated, professionally successful, Tim Walz didn’t put a prophylactic on his pennis when he fkcued his kid’s Nanny and got her pregnant. So he had his “Love Child” flushed down the sink.
That’s disgusting. What? He didn’t get the message about “safe sex”?
“Trump just clarified AGAIN … his personal stance on abortion ”
With emphasis on the word “personal”stance….his political stance is an entirely different story.
“… in his PRESS conference. His main point? The States … the PEOPLE … are voting on their State’s abortion laws now. That’s ALL the SCOTUS did … which is to rule that The Federal Government has no Right or Law by which to make abortion Law for the entire nation.”
Absolutely. Roe vs Wade was bad law right from the start. It was an *unconstitutional* law that should never have been passed in the first place, and thus did not survive the very first challenge to it.
“Abortion is not a “Civil Right” … it is a medical procedure. Some would say it’s murder. ”
It is certainly not “health care” or “reproductive rights”, either. Nor is it “awomansrighttochoose”, as many politicians express it (the A-word seems to just terrify them, for some reason. It’s almost like they’re not really proud of it…)
So you’re saying that Trump shouldn’t have done anything about COVID, because it wasn’t really a health threat to most people. He actually tried that back in Feb.-March of 2020 … he said that COVID was only killing the very old and very infirm. What happened? Trump was immediately excoriated by ALL the “public health experts” … including his own Vice President who was the COVID czar.
Trump had NO political choice whatsoever but to “follow the science” … and to employ “the scientists” to develop a vaccine. Trump didn’t develop the vaccine … Pfizer did. Fauxci did. And what should he have done? STOPPED the vaccine because HE knew better than the “scientists” ? Your banging on about this reveals only your TDS and lack of pragmatic common sense.
@Kenji
When you are explaining you are losing.
How so …. it appears that what went down during the fake pandemic needs explaining.
I for one, knew better than the experts … I DIDN’T GET THE JAB. and neither did my family nor what’s left of my fiends. The dumb ones are dealing with side-effects so I don’t see them anymore. Plus, I think some of them hate me for not getting the jab … go figure.
The smarter ones whom I still see, enjoy NOT haveing myocarditis or some other vaccine plague. and we drink to that.
Thanks for projecting, Karen.