Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
NGOs do not represent the people and when funded by government are nothing more than part of the corruption of illegitimately funding partisan lobbyists and thus subverting democracy. Smith is the voice of reason in an increasingly insane culturally suicidal post modern nihilism.
This “opt in” requirement for anything related to sex education is nonsense, for the same reason
that opt ins for organ donation is a failure.
Poor biology teachers:
“OK, how many have their forms filled out?”
“Right. Everybody else downto the library. ”
“Now Johnny, turn to the diagram on page 310.”
But Johnny will be the most popular kid in the class as kids line up to get his version of what was taught.
It sucks when people finally stand up to you and tell you ‘No” doesn’t it? Cry harder, my cup of Liberal Tears needs a top-up.
I don’t get the impression that it’s liberals that are forever banging on about how the country is doomed
No, they are too busy actually dooming it to ‘bang on about it”.
Conservative tears, then.
The Liberals can’t acknowledge that their failed policies are driving the country towards it’s doom.
That’s why you don’t hear them “banging on” about it.
They caused it.
They wanted it.
They like it.
Geoff H.
Perfect name.
If these are the types of arguments that are going to be used to attack Smith’s legislation then Smith has an leisurely walk in the park.
Sex education should be a structured, organized lesson plan. Parents should be consenting not just to the class but also be informed of the contents of the lesson. There’s a big difference between the basic education focussing on biology, pregnancy and safety than learning about more exotic fetishes. Parents should decide where that line is drawn and I think an opt-in would work.
Anyone who has done research on organ donation is happy that having to opt in reduces the numbers.
I sympathize with the people who require a transplant, but the transplant industry is a criminal enterprise.
Not to mention the requirement to get the jab if you want any parts.
Stolen comments from X (twitter):
-Was Danielle Smith the only topic covered in Canadian news yesterday??
-The only ‘experts’ consulted by CBC yesterday were tranies, angry socialists, and Trudeau fart catchers.
They didn’t bother to interview Parents in favour of Parental rights, or Albertans happy with the news.
Yesterday? Thats sounds like the experts the CBC consults all the time.
I watched the complete interview on a CTV youtube link.
Smith was a powerhouse during the loaded obnoxious questions.
You tube comments were 100% in Smith’s favour , at the expense of the so called ‘journalists’.
Very true. Giving weight to the comment below the NP article that there’s a tiny minority who, thanks to the media, seem to be the most vocal about this nonsense and in turn steering the narrative that somehow Smith is a far right extremist
Excellent moves. 15 is way too young. Childrens’ brains mature at age 25.
Also bring back acceptable counselling for kids to accept the chromosomes they were born with (my psychology association is dead wrong).
Very few children (maybe less than 1%) naturally want to be gay from a young age. Years of stats across cultures.
What is normal is having some children who are “tom boys” or “effeminate” boys. They eventually mature as normal adults, usually with opposite sex interests. Trannies emerge via culture, not nature, after puberty.
Brick bats to the Canadian Psychological Association and provincial regulatory bodies for outlawing counselling for minors to accept their sex=gender, as given.
More brick bats to our medical associations for life-altering, dangerous hormone therapy or surgery for children who should not have the legal right to make these decisions. Best to check the mental health of parents who want their children to go through this.
I love it that Danielle Smith is standing up and calling the rainbow lightning down on her own position. After the media freaks have a go at her for a while and she’s still standing there, not a mark on her, maybe some of these other “conservatives” will find a little steel for their spines.
Unlikely I know, but one can hope.
All Danielle needs to do to make the questioners into the obvious degenerates that they are is to ask them to define a woman and then laugh at them after they squirm around an attempt at obfuscation.
she already looks weary of the collective media stupidness
Who wouldn’t be, when your whole job entails making policy and talking to people.. I can barely stand interfacing w the general public one day of the week, just to run my errands.
It’s like invasion of the body (brain) snatchers out there, people being replaced one at a time by a facsimile of themselves, made stupid(er).
“No side effects”, my ass..
I can’t wait for the moment when they get outraged and say the NWSC was never intended to be used this way.
Some children were never given a choice.
https://stonetoss.com/comic/no-choice/
Here in the USA … the age limit should be 27. Because that’s when “children” can no longer be covered on their parents Obamakkare policies
The reporters asking those activist questions got nailed right between the eyes. I suffered from Anorexia, my lowest weight was 78 pounds, without help I would of died. I shutter to think if the alphabet people became involved with my illness the goberment would of sewed my lips shut as a solution to my illness? Watch the usual fools assert “You are going to get kids killed via suicide”. Rubbish the rate of suicide changes little after they transition minors.
The teenage psychological malady has changed over time. The amateur psychologist in me guesses that transgenderism and anorexia are different faces of the same disease where the mind creates a new reality for itself. Probably closely related to Salem witchcraft and other historical oddities.
Over 90% of people with any kind of body dysmorphia – sexual dysmorphia, anorexia, compusive eating, bodybuilding, cutting, tattoos, piercing etc. were sexually abused as children. It’s a self-destructive coping mechanism to stave off suicidal ideation.
The 5% that make up the freak show are a noisy bunch but this time they are up against the common sense of the common people .
The federal conservatives aren’t going to die on this hill. The libranos are salivating at the opportunity to bait them into a fight.
The queer agenda is pushing this outrage to the max. So driven are they that they can’t help themselves. They do their cause no good on this issue.
THEN
Michael (age 3) is watching Katherine (age 3) undress for swimming. As she begins to pull up her bathing suit, he stoops down to stare at her genital area. Student teacher Mary approaches the children with a frown on her face.
Taking Michael by the hand, she states, “That’s not nice. Go over and play with the boys.”
Sex Education with Young Children https://www.jstor.org/stable/42642837
NOW
“Take this form home. Then I can tell you why “Katherine doesn’t have a peepee”
I hear that the other PP is keeping mum about all this.
I hope you didn’t hurt yourself with that massive reach and contortion.
-I doubt unrelated 3 year old boys and girls would be in a group changing room situation to go swimming at the preschool level. Parents should be informed that it happened so they can handle it in the way they think is appropriate for their child.
– if young children are exposing themselves to each other in school, that isn’t part of a structured lesson plan that would require parental permission opt-in. Parents should be informed that it happened so they can handle it in the way they think is appropriate for their child.
// I doubt unrelated 3 year old boys and girls would be in a group changing room situation to go swimming at the preschool level. //
Evil starts early for you, does it?
Ever been to Europe?
https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-story-470508-48-.htm
I’ve been to Europe a couple of times…not sure what connections you’re making. Many Europeans are more comfortable with nudity but there are regional, national and rural/urban differences. Like us, they are also protective of their own children.
But, we’re talking about Canada and our norms and expectations in preschools and schools.
Just the connection you made. Nudity in kids that young is not sexual; it’s curiosity
unless some adult treats it as something shameful.
If the whole daycare goes swimming, they will all be in the women’s changing room.
[since all the carers are usually women]
Dizzy, that swimming situation just doesn’t happen with daycares or preschools because it would be a liability nightmare. Pools require small children to be within arms reach of an adult and there’s restrictions on the number of small kids one adult can supervise in a pool.
Dizzy, is that you Rachel N?
One truly good part in all this is that it’s flushing out all the pedophiles in the media who support this prepubescent sex change nonsense. By attacking the Premier they are simply further discrediting themselves in the eyes of the very few members of the public who take them seriously any more.
The MSM has yet to learn that if you are in the bottom of the bowl, stop flushing.
Heh, indeed. Flushes them out on SDA too.
Premier Smith is on a roll.
https://twitter.com/ABDanielleSmith/status/1752476544520569267
The media cartel massive propaganda in Calgary against Smith is something to behold.
They have interviewed and put on radio and tv, every ‘slighted’ adult that subscribe to the victimhood, never mind they will never have children.
They should keep it up. At most the offended represent 1% of Calgary voters. While voters with children represent at least 30% of voters. All the media scum are doing is making it that much easier to doom Rachel Notley’s NDP (or whomever her successor will be) to political oblivion in the next election.
It’s worth noting that thus far Notley seems to have said very little about the current media frenzy. Perhaps she knows that it’s unwise to stick her hand in a meat-grinder.
There were a few mentions in the past 24 hours on X that those celebrating their sex appearance conversations should be able to stop on the way home from their Dr. for a celebratory beer, smoke a joint, or a normal cig.
Will a note for this from your parent suffice?
Also, ear piercing in BC and maybe other jurisdictions requires a parent’s approval if under the age of majority.
It’s doubtful that Premier Smith should be worried about the fallout in the media, NGO’s or federal gov’t from this. Just responding with logic will dismiss them well enough.
All I heard yesterday is the government will pay for your neutering when you are old enough.
I have some gay friends/acquaintances – they think the loping off of penises is…nuts.
Anyone – hope you’re reading this Dizzy you piece of shit – who tries to mutilate kids needs to be skinned alive.
I’m not joking or exaggerating.
Saw some fck on CTV yesterday who was shitting a brick. Just bizarre and over-the-top.
The media is one big shitstorm of freaks-who-need-to-be-hanged.
Buddy wears his spleen on his sleeve.
I’ll cut out your liver and feed it to my dog.
Now Buddy, we frown on cruelty to animals here.
Mainstream reactions are informative.
They are calling this move by Danielle “common sense” etc. Check it out. Some from the Sun and even Lilley, are slithering over to the changing tide.
Oh, and Randy Boisinault, the Lone Lib in Alberta, actually called what Danielle said, “a NATO moment for the LBTGQ2+2=5” ‘community.’
KEEP ON KEEPING ON DANIELLE.
I am sick and tired of the tyranny of a perverted minority calling the shots. Two percent pushing around 98% cannot stand. FOOK their amplified attempts. I, for one, am done. Speak it, loudly…turn it up to 11.
Have a nice day.
PS: Thanks, Danielle, you sweet warrior. Keep going.
Danny didn’t make the kill shot, it is very weak and watered down. The kill shot would be NO gender changes and gender altering surgeries will be permitted in the province of Alberta end of discussion. Any advocation for sexually mutilation of kids = chemical castration and life in prison.
Never had sex-ed in my day. When you need to get told how your own most basic instincts work, you’re lost.
I was surprised in the 90s that women felt the need to teach how to properly breast-feed, when cats and dogs with sharp teeth can do it.
School should be about the three Rs, history, geography, etc, not about human instincts, we’re all born with that knowledge.
Seems to me that the more prevalent sex-ed has become in schools, the worse things have become.
Oh, and dizzy is a pedo apologist.
// LC Bennet February 2, 2024 at 9:34 pm
Dizzy, that swimming situation just doesn’t happen with daycares or preschools because it would be a liability nightmare. //
Admittedly the day home I regularly visit doesn’t offer swimming or paddling lessons.
Not could I find any online. So I guess you are right on that score