Just don’t hang out with libtards and this will never happen to you.
There’s a reason division is good.
I love how they crack down on smokers so much, and drunk drivers, and guns, and lawn darts, etc, when it is clear they have no interest in saving lives, in fact, the number of “lives saved” by these authoritarian measures are less than the noise in death rates caused by the weather.
It should be clear to even the dullest of people that the intent is merely to exercise power, to our detriment, nothing more, nothing less.
The opening line is:
“Every person commits an offence who engages in any conduct with the intent to provoke a state of fear in”
If you engage in any conduct that causes someone to fear submitting to MAID, you are a criminal. I’m sure the Santa suits will argue that imprisoning Christians for trying to save souls is a justifiable infringement on religion.
Wait till they lock up the anti-MNRA folks for trying to dissuade people from injections. A parent telling their kids of potential harm, a criminal.
The anti-abortion folks are criminals too.
Yet they use the “state of fear” for “climate change”. This is what fascism looks like.
They used “state of fear” to pass DUI checkpoints, anti-smoker BS laws, ban lawn darts, cigarette vending machines, gun laws, drug laws, etc.
Yes, it looks designed specifically to criminalize the communication of genuine science for the purpose of showing someone the utter failure of the regulatory process to establish safety, as in the case of the mRNA treansfection injections that were called vaccines.
I guess this means if a sane mental health professional (does that exist anymore?) tries to help a suicidal tranny by helping them be comfortable in their actual body – death penalty?
Don’t try to save the unborn or life worn.
Eliminating FREE SPEECH … and worse: FREE THOUGHT.
Pink Floyd … the silly leftists … sang: We don’t need no education …
We don’t need no thought control
How dangerously ironic that once they obtained POWER … they are demanding thought control. As if none of us SANE people could have predicted that …
Orwell was definitely ahead of his time.
I’d get a bus drivers license so I could drive JT and his cabinet to their appointment.
De guvvermint is holding off of MAID for mental health problems.
Perhaps they’re concerned about losing too many of their base.
How does a mentally ill person give consent? Can’t. Someone else is judge/jury and the doctor the executioner.
Welcome to Canada, land of progressive euphemisms, where being killed by a doctor is a “health service”.
Yaa well.. Work hard to support the globalist heap or take the cowards way out and hang yourself in your own basement?.. Like I need help.. Like I need a sleeze bag RX.. To end myself properly.. How useless do you need to be?..
As usual.. Gross..
Wouldn’t the MAID recipient need to stay alive to testify?
are “Dying declarations” allowed as evidence in canada?
Never forget that euthanasia was not just allowed by the Supreme court but required based on the constitutional right to life.
That’s right, the argument was that someone with a degenerative disease such as Lou Gehrig’s might take their life early if Maid weren’t available. Yet on the same page of the decision, they allow require the law to cover those without a degenerative disease.
Our constitution does not actually protect human rights. The fact that Supreme court decisions trump other legislation and they require laws, not just veto make them dangerous legislators. Legislators that are largely out of reach of voters.
So what about the cop talking down the guy on the bridge
So the government killing you is a “health service”..
Excellent.
So strangling a Liberal is what?
Post birth abortion?
CO2 reduction?
Or premature MAID?
Careful there, John! Post birth abortion and premature MAID, for many of us, is illegally exercising “medicine”. CO2 reduction it is!!
This seems more of a means to protect abortuaries. Telling someone they risk the Lake of Fire for murdering a preborn person is the intent. But it will apply to warning someone not to go for MAiD too. The Interpretation Act requires laws to ne stretch interpreted to the point the government can practically nail you for almost anything it eants.
Here is the related Hansard. It was passed unanimously. My MP (CPC) was a total dickhead in saying how great it was. The Dippers continued TurdHole’s attack on normal people. The intent of Parliament was to criminalise those who won’t adhere to the COVID religion. https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/house/sitting-19/hansard
Warning someone about the jab will be a jailable offense.
Not to worry, the more that take the jabs and the more jabs they take there will be fewer idiots around to bother us sane people who knew better than to take the jabs or believe anything about the faux pandemic.
No matter how many ways they twist things to achieve their globalist goals, they can’t avoid the reality that…….
death is NOT a side effect!
The wording is very vague, surely on purpose. If I argue someone should not take another covid shot, is that “impeding” or “provoking fear”? Surely it would be considered so by this government. This law is seriously scary.
Just don’t hang out with libtards and this will never happen to you.
There’s a reason division is good.
I love how they crack down on smokers so much, and drunk drivers, and guns, and lawn darts, etc, when it is clear they have no interest in saving lives, in fact, the number of “lives saved” by these authoritarian measures are less than the noise in death rates caused by the weather.
It should be clear to even the dullest of people that the intent is merely to exercise power, to our detriment, nothing more, nothing less.
The opening line is:
“Every person commits an offence who engages in any conduct with the intent to provoke a state of fear in”
If you engage in any conduct that causes someone to fear submitting to MAID, you are a criminal. I’m sure the Santa suits will argue that imprisoning Christians for trying to save souls is a justifiable infringement on religion.
Wait till they lock up the anti-MNRA folks for trying to dissuade people from injections. A parent telling their kids of potential harm, a criminal.
The anti-abortion folks are criminals too.
Yet they use the “state of fear” for “climate change”. This is what fascism looks like.
They used “state of fear” to pass DUI checkpoints, anti-smoker BS laws, ban lawn darts, cigarette vending machines, gun laws, drug laws, etc.
Yes, it looks designed specifically to criminalize the communication of genuine science for the purpose of showing someone the utter failure of the regulatory process to establish safety, as in the case of the mRNA treansfection injections that were called vaccines.
I guess this means if a sane mental health professional (does that exist anymore?) tries to help a suicidal tranny by helping them be comfortable in their actual body – death penalty?
Don’t try to save the unborn or life worn.
Eliminating FREE SPEECH … and worse: FREE THOUGHT.
Pink Floyd … the silly leftists … sang:
We don’t need no education …
We don’t need no thought control
How dangerously ironic that once they obtained POWER … they are demanding thought control. As if none of us SANE people could have predicted that …
Orwell was definitely ahead of his time.
I’d get a bus drivers license so I could drive JT and his cabinet to their appointment.
De guvvermint is holding off of MAID for mental health problems.
https://nationalnewswatch.com/2024/01/28/policymakers-must-focus-on-actual-risks-of-expanding-maid-for-mental-illness-not-legal-speculation
Perhaps they’re concerned about losing too many of their base.
How does a mentally ill person give consent? Can’t. Someone else is judge/jury and the doctor the executioner.
Welcome to Canada, land of progressive euphemisms, where being killed by a doctor is a “health service”.
Yaa well.. Work hard to support the globalist heap or take the cowards way out and hang yourself in your own basement?.. Like I need help.. Like I need a sleeze bag RX.. To end myself properly.. How useless do you need to be?..
As usual.. Gross..
Wouldn’t the MAID recipient need to stay alive to testify?
are “Dying declarations” allowed as evidence in canada?
Never forget that euthanasia was not just allowed by the Supreme court but required based on the constitutional right to life.
That’s right, the argument was that someone with a degenerative disease such as Lou Gehrig’s might take their life early if Maid weren’t available. Yet on the same page of the decision, they allow require the law to cover those without a degenerative disease.
Our constitution does not actually protect human rights. The fact that Supreme court decisions trump other legislation and they require laws, not just veto make them dangerous legislators. Legislators that are largely out of reach of voters.
So what about the cop talking down the guy on the bridge
So the government killing you is a “health service”..
Excellent.
So strangling a Liberal is what?
Post birth abortion?
CO2 reduction?
Or premature MAID?
Careful there, John! Post birth abortion and premature MAID, for many of us, is illegally exercising “medicine”. CO2 reduction it is!!
This seems more of a means to protect abortuaries. Telling someone they risk the Lake of Fire for murdering a preborn person is the intent. But it will apply to warning someone not to go for MAiD too. The Interpretation Act requires laws to ne stretch interpreted to the point the government can practically nail you for almost anything it eants.
Here is the related Hansard. It was passed unanimously. My MP (CPC) was a total dickhead in saying how great it was. The Dippers continued TurdHole’s attack on normal people. The intent of Parliament was to criminalise those who won’t adhere to the COVID religion.
https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/house/sitting-19/hansard
Warning someone about the jab will be a jailable offense.
Not to worry, the more that take the jabs and the more jabs they take there will be fewer idiots around to bother us sane people who knew better than to take the jabs or believe anything about the faux pandemic.
No matter how many ways they twist things to achieve their globalist goals, they can’t avoid the reality that…….
death is NOT a side effect!
The wording is very vague, surely on purpose. If I argue someone should not take another covid shot, is that “impeding” or “provoking fear”? Surely it would be considered so by this government. This law is seriously scary.