I suppose we could export the research work to China. It worked with bats.
So did I…
It was silent…but deadly…
Left in my wake.
From a true ‘Black Hole’.
Bull crap…2 dimension space and three dimension space is different.
I’m no scientist, but to me, why isn’t that part of their consideration, from an absolute layman. Rather obvious.
Interesting but there are some pretty big holes in that experiment.
Can we stop doing these experiments on earth.
alecincgy,
Elon Musk is working on that as fast as he can.
“What Could Possibly Go Wrong?”
Nothing, that’s what.
It’s a simulation.
Even if AdS/CFT turns out to be true, and they make a real one at CERN, it won’t do anything, as it’ll evaporate.
Also, cosmic rays are hitting the Earth with way more energy than they can make at CERN every day.
In 100 years, cosmic rays with way more energy will only be hitting us every 10 years.
You people are a bunch of Nervous Nellies, looking for an excuse to be scared.
And in the end … the battle of Armageddon was over in a microsecond as the known Universe was sucked into a black eternity.
+++Kenji
Um, actually, except for short range radiation which might effect the scientists (if they are stupid), nothing can really go wrong. I read it, they are not making a black hole, they are merely simulating a way to make Hawkins Radiation. It is impossible to create a black hole on Earth.
Well, unless you can figure out a way to haul several stellar masses to earth and smush them together. If you can, radiation will be the least of our problems.
Currently, “artificial gravity” is fiction, and looks like it always will be. Swallowing the Earth in an artificial black hole is also B grade fiction, at best. Hate to burst your bubble. If someone tells you otherwise, it is just clickbait.
Will it in any way shape or form make our lives better?
Wellllll…
They might discover something new and useful…or
They might just be spending money to have the money.
Gotta make a living somehow.
This perhaps explains Fermi’s Paradox – i.e., planets become advanced enough to destroy themselves with things like this before they develop interstellar space travel
I’d be far more worried about that glow in the dark monkey the Chicoms just hatched.
Because that’s what the world needs… communist selective breeding run amok.
That’s how we got the problem we have now at Sussex Drive…..
: o ) –
The brunette in ABBA was born as a result of an SS selective breeding program.
AKA a Deutzenbrat.
“This is where black holes come into the picture – possibly the weirdest, most extreme objects in the Universe. These massive objects are so incredibly dense that, within a certain distance of the black hole’s center of mass, no velocity in the Universe is sufficient for escape. Not even light speed.”
Me : What the heck does density have to do with anything? Gravity is a function of mass and distance.
“That distance, varying depending on the mass of the black hole, is called the event horizon.
Me: You can see here that the author switches from density to mass. And the term “event horizon” is what astrophysicists say to each other at night when they jerk each other off.
“Once an object crosses its boundary we can only imagine what happens, since nothing returns with vital information on its fate. ”
Me: So the absence of information is proof that black holes exist.
NASA says:
A black hole is a place in space where gravity pulls so much that even light can not get out. The gravity is so strong because matter has been squeezed into a tiny space. This can happen when a star is dying. Because no light can get out, people can’t see black holes. They are invisible.
Me: This is rubbish. It is a grant seeking rationalisation of under-employed astrophysicists.
I much prefer the old joke:
Why do elephants paint themselves red?
It is because they like to hide in cherry trees.
But…but…but
Have you ever seen an elephant in a cherry tree?
No.
I rest my case.
density is mass/distance^3.
Math is hard, evidently, even if its freshman algebra.
The author implies that the gravitational pull of a collapsing star gets stronger because its density increases ignoring the fact that the mass of a collapsing star remains constant. With the collapsing star’s mass remaining constant its gravitational pull also remains constant thereby undercutting the whole theory of the origin of Black Holes.
YW: Snark is not a substitute for reasoned argument and there is more than a whiff of bad faith when you respond this way.
If all the mass is concentrated, then the force of gravity goes up:
F=G*m1*m2/d^2.
see, as d goes down, F goes up.
You are either an idiot or an ahole or both.
YW: Your understanding of the formula for universal gravitation is – how shall we say this – unique. Others would describe it in less flattering terms.
The mathematical and scientific illiteracy of the right is exceeded only by that of the left.
Sounds like government spending.
I suppose we could export the research work to China. It worked with bats.
So did I…
It was silent…but deadly…
Left in my wake.
From a true ‘Black Hole’.
Bull crap…2 dimension space and three dimension space is different.
I’m no scientist, but to me, why isn’t that part of their consideration, from an absolute layman. Rather obvious.
Interesting but there are some pretty big holes in that experiment.
Can we stop doing these experiments on earth.
alecincgy,
Elon Musk is working on that as fast as he can.
“What Could Possibly Go Wrong?”
Nothing, that’s what.
It’s a simulation.
Even if AdS/CFT turns out to be true, and they make a real one at CERN, it won’t do anything, as it’ll evaporate.
Also, cosmic rays are hitting the Earth with way more energy than they can make at CERN every day.
In 100 years, cosmic rays with way more energy will only be hitting us every 10 years.
You people are a bunch of Nervous Nellies, looking for an excuse to be scared.
And in the end … the battle of Armageddon was over in a microsecond as the known Universe was sucked into a black eternity.
+++Kenji
Um, actually, except for short range radiation which might effect the scientists (if they are stupid), nothing can really go wrong. I read it, they are not making a black hole, they are merely simulating a way to make Hawkins Radiation. It is impossible to create a black hole on Earth.
Well, unless you can figure out a way to haul several stellar masses to earth and smush them together. If you can, radiation will be the least of our problems.
Currently, “artificial gravity” is fiction, and looks like it always will be. Swallowing the Earth in an artificial black hole is also B grade fiction, at best. Hate to burst your bubble. If someone tells you otherwise, it is just clickbait.
Will it in any way shape or form make our lives better?
Wellllll…
They might discover something new and useful…or
They might just be spending money to have the money.
Gotta make a living somehow.
“Whatever you do, don’t cross the streams.”
https://youtu.be/wyKQe_i9yyo
This perhaps explains Fermi’s Paradox – i.e., planets become advanced enough to destroy themselves with things like this before they develop interstellar space travel
I’d be far more worried about that glow in the dark monkey the Chicoms just hatched.
Because that’s what the world needs… communist selective breeding run amok.
That’s how we got the problem we have now at Sussex Drive…..
: o ) –
The brunette in ABBA was born as a result of an SS selective breeding program.
AKA a Deutzenbrat.
“This is where black holes come into the picture – possibly the weirdest, most extreme objects in the Universe. These massive objects are so incredibly dense that, within a certain distance of the black hole’s center of mass, no velocity in the Universe is sufficient for escape. Not even light speed.”
Me : What the heck does density have to do with anything? Gravity is a function of mass and distance.
“That distance, varying depending on the mass of the black hole, is called the event horizon.
Me: You can see here that the author switches from density to mass. And the term “event horizon” is what astrophysicists say to each other at night when they jerk each other off.
“Once an object crosses its boundary we can only imagine what happens, since nothing returns with vital information on its fate. ”
Me: So the absence of information is proof that black holes exist.
NASA says:
A black hole is a place in space where gravity pulls so much that even light can not get out. The gravity is so strong because matter has been squeezed into a tiny space. This can happen when a star is dying. Because no light can get out, people can’t see black holes. They are invisible.
Me: This is rubbish. It is a grant seeking rationalisation of under-employed astrophysicists.
I much prefer the old joke:
Why do elephants paint themselves red?
It is because they like to hide in cherry trees.
But…but…but
Have you ever seen an elephant in a cherry tree?
No.
I rest my case.
density is mass/distance^3.
Math is hard, evidently, even if its freshman algebra.
The author implies that the gravitational pull of a collapsing star gets stronger because its density increases ignoring the fact that the mass of a collapsing star remains constant. With the collapsing star’s mass remaining constant its gravitational pull also remains constant thereby undercutting the whole theory of the origin of Black Holes.
YW: Snark is not a substitute for reasoned argument and there is more than a whiff of bad faith when you respond this way.
If all the mass is concentrated, then the force of gravity goes up:
F=G*m1*m2/d^2.
see, as d goes down, F goes up.
You are either an idiot or an ahole or both.
YW: Your understanding of the formula for universal gravitation is – how shall we say this – unique. Others would describe it in less flattering terms.
The mathematical and scientific illiteracy of the right is exceeded only by that of the left.