95 Replies to “Trust The Experts”

    1. This great video has been out for a while (maybe even a year), but the reach of Musk posting it will be huge.

    1. The vaccines were highly effective – highly effective at making lots and lots of money for the drug companies! By the way, I have always loved the “Hall of the Mountain King” music.

  3. If you wait for the Canadian media cartel to write about this on the first page, you will just wait and wait and wait.

    1. Well, they’re pretty busy providing endless coverage of the liberal Seig Heil! that Uke näzi got in ottawa. But soon!

      mhb23re

  4. Well done! Let’s first stop calling all of them vaccines – none have any scientific or medical 10-year track record.

    I would not trust our Canadian Chief Medical Officer nor the American one nor all heath people at the UN. That latter organization should be de-funded and extensively shut down.

      1. I thought Blackrock/Vanguard owned the UN…? They own everything else, including the “vaccines” and the politicians and “health experts” that enforce them.

  5. No vaccine prevents any deaths.

    Calling toxins “vaccines” doesn’t change anything. Virology is complete anti-scientific quackery.

    And the people pushing the Coronahoax BS are fully aware of this.

  6. 97% of Climate Scientists agree that mankind is killing the planet, and that you must be severely punished for using fossil fuels.

    1. 97% of climate scientists get paid by governments to study global warming. How can that be if there is no global warming?

      1. “97% of climate scientists get paid by governments to study global warming. How can that be if there is no global warming?”

        That’s the beauty of this particular scam: the scientists get government grants to push the narrative of the Climate Crisis. The Climate Crisis allows the government to create taxes, fees and eco-levies which go directly into their coffers, and all of this with *the fervent approval* of the public!

        “Tax us even more!!”, they cry. “Save the planet…for the children!”

        The odd politician who had tried to resist the scam and inject a little common sense into the discussion suddenly found themselves under attack from all sides, and they quickly realized that there is no future in resisting the inevitable. People really, truly believe in this fear-mongering BS, and will continue to do so…so it’s much easier to just “go with the flow”, take the extra money generated and keep your mouth shut.

      1. Hi joe,regarding the lemming thing ,the national film board of Canada showed us this film on CBC back in the 60s. The concept of the lemmings running off the cliff to their doom is a hoax. The film crew herded the animals off themselves while filming them! The irony of this the is lemmings are blamed for their fear of humans while humans still believe CBC is not a hoax ridden piece of garbage! Animals don’t jump to their deaths without provocation. People often believe almost anything without question!

        1. That was a Disney production.

          All filmed on a sound stage until the end when they dumped a few boxes of lemmings near a cliff and chased them off, then watched as they swam out to sea to drown.

          Still happens today. BBC strands a seal on an iceberg then films from all angles as the killer whales attack.

          Absolutely nothing on TV is real.

  7. The COVID vaccines were over 90% effective at preventing infection in the early days, so at least some of these headlines were accurate at the time. The problem is that the effectiveness fell off sharply as the virus mutated, and as a function of time since vaccination.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552389/#:~:text=In%20clinical%20trials%2C%20three%20vaccines,of%20COVID%2D19%20infection10.

    https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2117128

    1. Nope fake news. They never prevented infection and in fact the pushers now say they never claimed it did.

        1. Large scale studies, you are so funny- the current covid jab study consisted of 23 mice and we don’t know if any of them survived?

          1. “The current covid jab study”

            The number of scientific studies on COVID now number in the hundreds of thousands (literally), and the COVID vaccines are now among the most studied ever.

        2. As is always done with those pushing fake-science, the underlying terms and definitions were changed to allow for the pre-determined outcomes.

          “Unvaccinated” was changed to include the vaccinated – that was the only was to show “infection” symptoms among the “unvaccinated”.

          Those who had real unrelated health issues were included as “Covid” sufferers.

          Results included those with the less-than-useless false positive results from the PCR tests, which are not designed to be indicators of infection.

          The frauds behind the Coronahoax, much like the anti-scientific BS of global warming, are liars and deceivers. They use scientific-sounding words, and mention scientific principles, but nothing they do uses the scientific method.

          They should all be lined up against a wall.

          1. The same frauds are behind the new Pfizer RSV vaccine that they are pumping into everyone, including infants and pregnant women.

            Most people would understand the word “placebo” to mean something the people in the control arm of a trial are given that is inert and doesn’t do anything, but the people don’t know that.

            In the Pfizer RSV trial, one arm was given the full vaccine, and the “placebo” arm was given the vaccine without the active ingredients that deals with the RSV.

            That means the trial AS DESIGNED covered up any side effects caused by the parts of the vaccine given to everyone, and there was no real control group, just like in their Covid trial,

          2. And you have evidence of those allegations, do you? Good. Let’s see that evidence.

            Of course you don’t. You started with the desired conclusions, and made up allegations in an attempt to undercut the massive amount of scientific evidence that stands in your way.

          3. Killer Marmot’s line of “thinking” appears to be: unless the organizations headed by the perennially lying, self-interested POS’s behind these anti-scientific scams publish papers arguing against their own lies, then their lies must be truth.

            To his/her credit, most people were deceived. It takes effort, real research, and brainpower to see through the lies. KM is severely lacking on the second point – mistaking reading a plethora of lies as “research”.

          4. Watto’s line of “thinking” is that all of his buddies on the internet assure him that COVID vaccines are a giant fraud, so he buys into that with no decent facts to back it up. If you ask him to provide solid evidence, he simply alleges that everyone who presents scientific evidence to the contrary is corrupt and has been bought out — again with no evidence to back up the claim, and despite the implausibility of the idea that so many scientific teams spread throughout the world could be bought out.

            It’s a hermetically sealed echo chamber impervious to facts.

          5. I already listed several categories of the easily-verifiable deceptions and outright lies the POS’s behind the Coronahoax employed.

            And you argue like a child – attempting to invert my argument using what you want to believe to be true.

            And you are using the fallacy of appealing to the majority. It is easy for a handful of POSs to control the output of those employed by them. Case-in-point: every government and public sector union on earth. Anyone competent, ethical, or intelligent is either fired or quits, until you have the desired echo-chamber.

            You would argue about the implausibility that so many mafia outfits could all be involved in crime.

            Try thinking a little deeper, and far less naively.

            You are the kid trying to educate the adults that the magician at your birthday party actually DOES magic.

          6. “I already listed several categories of the easily-verifiable deceptions and outright lies the POS’s behind the Coronahoax employed.”

            Those are allegations, not evidence. Present evidence that COVID scientfic research is corrupt.

          7. What qualifies as evidence to you, KM?

            What evidence would you have pointed to at the time to prove that the Holodomor actually occurred? Or would you instead quote numerous Soviet publications, media, experts, and government officials that the whole thing was a vast right-wing conspiracy?

            Please re-learn to think for yourself.

          8. ““Unvaccinated” was changed to include the vaccinated – that was the only was to show “infection” symptoms among the “unvaccinated”.”

            Yes, and when caught they invented a new term: fully vaccinated.

          2. At some point, you should seriously consider stopping the outsourcing of your thinking to organizations claiming to be experts whose research you are unable to verify. Especially when these organizations consistently put out research that runs contrary to common sense and your own personal experience. Even more so when the spokesmen for these organizations are known POSs with no related credentials, such as the Jesuit POS, Anthony Fauci. Or the Roman Catholic Bill Gates. Or backed by the Pope.

            This is supposed to be about truth, and science is supposed to be a tool of the truth. But “science” in the hands of Roman Catholics generally, and Jesuits specifically is simply another tool in the belt to push the goals of their cult.

            To them, the ends justify the means.

            And sadly speaking in science-ese in the publications they control is enough to fool the simple, who have become conditioned to trust “the experts”, even when the “experts” are anything but.

          3. “At some point, you should seriously consider stopping the outsourcing of your thinking to organizations claiming to be experts whose research you are unable to verify.”

            I have good reason to place my bets on the side of the medical community. Through their work, we are healthier and more long-lived than at any time in history. It’s not at all perfect, but it’s vastly better than any alternative. If you disagree, name that alternative. Tell me a surer path to the truth.

            I’ll give you a hint: Some guy with a podcast and an attitude isn’t it.

          4. If you believe that the publications you read are representative of the medical community, then you will lose most of your bets. If you research those who control the current medical system, you will learn that they have done more to suppress health and wellness than anytime in recorded history. They have laid waste to vast swaths of actual medical practice, and have funneled people through a very narrow and prescribed “education” system where inquiry and curiosity is strongly discouraged.

            They claim we are healthier, though we live shorter lives, and everyone suffers from what has become common to our generation – asthma, autism, allergies, dry eyes, cancer, organ diseases, and mountains of new syndromes and diseases. And this all coincides with the common belief in drugs and poisons sold under the name “vaccines”.

            I could certainly point you to no shortage of places for you to find truth, but you have already made up your mind, and dismiss those who don’t affirm your faith, which you mistake as intelligence.

            You expect that the brave people in the medical community who point out the lies, fraud, and deception in their fields will be lined up to be interviewed on the CBC. Or spend their own money to buy green screens, professional audio/video equipment, and support a crew fully backed by advertisers to get out their message. Because surely you would if you were in their shoes…

            So comfort yourself with your controlled info articles that come on glossy pages, or the soothing voices of professional actors reading scripts on tv. Because to you the presentation correlates with the truth.

          5. Again, you’re making sweeping generalizations with no evidence.

            “I could certainly point you to no shortage of places for you to find truth, but you have already made up your mind”

            A cynic would might think that no such places exist and you’re bluffing. But of course I’m not a cynic, so I’m giving you the opportunity to name a few of those places.

          6. If you have any interest in pursuing this, you’ll spend some time and effort and find it yourself. I have no interest in spending my time to feed a troll.

            If you care enough, put in the effort. If not, enjoy your life as you perceive it. It’ll spare you the red or blue pill decision.

          7. “If you have any interest in pursuing this, you’ll spend some time and effort and find it yourself. I have no interest in spending my time to feed a troll.”

            I’ve seen that bluff many times before. It translates to “I got nothin’.” The wonderment is that those making it seem to think it’s convincing. It convinces no one.

            All these squabbles come down to one thing: evidence. Everything else is just arm waving. That’s why I invariably provide links to scientific papers.

            And I keep asking the same question: what is the evidence that the COVID vaccines don’t work and are even harmful? And I almost never get a sensible reply. Just a lot of bluffs and unsubstantiated claims. Anti-vax has become a cult untethered from reality.

          8. No, you’re not looking for evidence. You’re asking for the liars to admit they are lying.

            You can’t differentiate between liars and those presenting you facts. You instead give weight to establishment voices, even when those voices have been shown time and time again to be those of liars.

            You are either so simple as to not comprehend this basic fact, or too attached to what you want to believe is true.

            From your comments, I’d guess it’s both.

          9. “You can’t differentiate between liars and those presenting you facts.”

            What facts have you presented? You’ve made allegations, but without supporting evidence they count for nothing.

          10. The evidence has been repeatedly identified here, and you are proving too lazy to pull it up, yet have no issue hurriedly Googling to find articles about the Amish. You just want to argue, not to learn or find truth.

            And your standard of “evidence” is moronic, as previously explained.

            Back under your bridge, troll.

          11. “The evidence has been repeatedly identified here, and you are proving too lazy to pull it up”

            I have studied that “evidence” in considerable detail, and have often commented on it here over the last two years. I’m likely far more informed on it than you are. And it’s uniformly crappy. I can not point to any that purports to demonstrate the ineffectiveness or dangers of COVID vaccines that stands up to even cursory examination.

            Perhaps you disagree. Fine. All you have to do is present some good evidence. That’s all you have to do.

            And if you can’t, you should rethink your assumptions.

          12. “you are proving too lazy to pull it up”

            You call me lazy, and what you’re too lazy to provide a single link to support your own claims. You just expect others to do it for you.

            My theory is that you don’t do it because you can’t. You don’t actually have any solid evidence supporting your claims. It’s a gut feeling you have, not anything based on facts.

          13. Your gut feeling is wrong, and you are certainly far less informed than me. You consider being “informed” reading more of the same gamed information.

            You lack common sense in this area, and attempting to awaken you is like trying to make a blind man see by describing his environs.

            The fact that you continue to check on this post suggests you to be trolling.

            So I leave you – until you bring up this topic again somewhere else.

          14. Claims are easy. Evidence is hard.

            And you, Watto, have no evidence. Just a gut feeling, which reality has no respect for.

    3. Your top link sources this: “In fully vaccinated individuals, VE against symptomatic and asymptomatic infections was 80-90% in nearly all studies.”

      You are misquoting it. There was never a study showing 90% effectiveness. Low numbers of infections in either group can create wild over-estimations of vaccine efficacy (which is different from effectiveness).

      “A popular misconception is that efficacy relates to an individual’s percent chance of infection; some people mistakenly believe that if a vaccine has 80% efficacy, people who receive it will have only a 20% chance of getting infected.

      In reality, efficacy means that, out of the people in the clinical trial, those who received the vaccine had an 80% lower risk of developing disease than the group who received the placebo. That percentage is calculated by comparing the percentage of cases of disease in the vaccinated group versus the placebo group (that is, the group who didn’t receive a vaccine) after the trial is completed.

      An example: Imagine there were 100 people in the vaccine group, and 100 people in the placebo group. If 10 people in the placebo group became infected, but only 2 in the vaccine group got sick, that means the vaccine has reduced the chances of illness by 80%; thus, it is considered to have an efficacy of 80%.

      https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-vaccine-efficacy-and-effectiveness

      Your second link is addressing the effectiveness in preventing hospitalization and death. That is not the same as effectiveness against getting and transmitting Covid-19.

      1. To add: COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room

        ” . .Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 91% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines. However, RRR should be seen against the background risk of being infected and becoming ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines. . .”

        https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext

      2. One of the studies showed most papers between 80-90% effectiveness, with three papers over 90%. I stand corrected. I guess we can agree that effectivness exceeded 80%.

        The second study measured vaccine effectiveness against infection, hospitalization, and death, as seen in this quote:

        “we estimated the effectiveness of the three Covid-19 vaccines currently deployed in the United States in reducing the risks of Covid-19, hospitalization, and death up to 9 months after vaccination.”

        The authors were a little careless — at least in regards to non-expert readers — in their phrasing. When they said “effectiveness” without modification they meant effectiveness against infection. They’re arrived at figures of 94.5% and 95.9% effective (depending on the dose) two months after innoculation.

    4. Take a hike. The COVID “vaccines” are garbage. In fact, they damage immune systems. The data from countries like heavily vaccinated New Zealand tell the tale. I’ll repeat….the COVID “vaccines” are garbage.

      1. Could you provide references to this New Zealand data? I’ve heard rumours about it for a long time, but I’ve never been able to find anything on it. I’m not even sure what people are referring to.

    5. This claim is invalidated by counting vaxed in the first two weeks (sometimes 3) as unvaxed. It screws up any claims of effectiveness. And we know that old folks in care homes were dropping like flies shortly after being vaxed.

      1. “This claim is invalidated by counting vaxed in the first two weeks (sometimes 3) as unvaxed.”

        How are they supposed to do it? One doesn’t develop full resistance to a disease in the first hour after vaccination. It takes a couple of weeks for your immune system to fully respond.

        https://www.verywellhealth.com/covid-19-vaccine-immunity-time-5091651

        At any rate, the two-week delay actually reduces the apparent effectiveness of the vaccine, as some who are labelled “unvaxxed” will actually have some resistance to COVID. In other words, the effectiveness of the vaccine is if anything understated.

  8. I don’t care if the vaccine fanatics have a shot a month, I’ve gone beyond caring what the deluded think, want or opine. They don’t work, the more you have the more covid you get, and that is just fine with me.

      1. “I have faith most vaccines are effective; this was not a vaccine.”

        My thoughts as well. If you find it necessary to actually change the definition of the word ‘vaccine’ to cover your mistakes, it’s not a vaccine.

      2. I have lost faith in most vaccines. Vaccines are a sacred cow in our society, but too many reports of damage and ill health following vaccines. Our control group are the Amish. In Japan, the significantly reduced SIDs by waiting a number of years before vaccinating. In North America,we still operate in the dark ages with respect to vaccines.

  9. The Canadian Conservatives should take note of this tweet and make 20-30 similar, but filled with the lies of the #Libranos and how they slag everyone who isn’t on team #Librano, will all the times they’ve said “X isn’t ok”, and then follow though with #Librano level X in order to cover up their lies.

    “guns in our streets” etc… Nazis are bad… WE Foundation is good, everything connected to SNC Lavalin, the women Trudeau has run out of his cabinet, Trudeau’s non disclosure agreement to cover up the underage girls he taught, and 1000’s of lies regarding everything involving the covid fiasco

    1. The Conservatives, under Poilievre, voted in lockstep with the Liberals and NDP to strip away our rights during covid.

      They are 100% complicit in this debacle, ie : equally guilty.

      2. All political parties are controlled by the same people. They just push different parts of the agenda during their terms in office.

        When they both agree on a topic, or only argue over peripheral issues, you know it’s a high-value issue being pushed on us.

        Like the “war on terror”.

        And “Global Warming”.

        And the Coronahoax.

        All lies, used to chip away further at the few remaining rights, freedoms, and wealth we have left.

      3. “The Conservatives, under Poilievre, voted in lockstep with the Liberals and NDP to strip away our rights during covid.

        They are 100% complicit in this debacle, ie : equally guilty.”

        While I can’t say that you are wrong about that, I will say that they had little choice. It’s the same situation they found themselves in over climate change: when nearly 100% of the opposition *and* the news media can’t wait to jump on you and call you “deniers”, what else can you reasonably do?

        (other than grow a spine, which seems impossible for any of the current bunch in Canada…)

        1. As you noted, they had a choice about both climate change and the Wuhan flu: be brave and tell the truth.

          But they chose the path of cowards, and we all suffer because of it.

        2. Conservatives should have picked up the ball and started to ask questions as problems with the vacvines became apparent. Even now they should be picking up on points made in the NCI hearings to question government Covid policies.

        3. “…I will say that they had little choice.”

          Horse shit. Like everyone else, they had a choice & they made it.

          “…what else can you reasonably do?”

          Tell the effers to get stuffed. If they actually had spines, they wouldn’t care what the opposition, media or the devil himself said or thought.

      4. Polivierre wasn’t leader until Sept. 10 of 2022 and met with convoy protesters. If you’d like to discuss Erin O’Toole whipping the caucus into voting in lockstep with the Liberals go ahead but PP was not the leader at the time.

      5. Weyland.
        The CPC was led by OFool at the time, where he was deposed while the Truckers Convoy was underway.
        Try to stay up to date.
        Oh, and KM lies like a rug, he’s controlled oppo.
        BC government stats shows 90% Covid deaths from Feb 2022 thru July 2022.
        What did the BC Government do as a result?
        Why, they ERASED THE DATA. The data thoroughly destroyed the Jab narrative.
        It’s a bioweapon. KM is a spook.

  12. “But “science” in the hands of Roman Catholics generally, and Jesuits specifically is simply another tool in the belt to push the goals of their cult.” Watto

    I think I’ll be moving my chair to the Marmot side now, thanks. Great job, Watto.

    1. I’m not trying to sway anyone here Christopher, just refuting KM’s verbal diarrhea that was masquerading as truth.

      I’m kinda like most of the books of what we call the “Old Testament” (before being corrupted by Roman Catholics pretending to be the “Masoretes” to purposely mistranslate it). I’m just stating the facts. It’s up to you to choose whether or not you want to dive into any of my assertions.

      1. KM uses the same strategy as climate fraudsters. Pointing to “studies” written by NGOs, dependent on government financing to exist.
        It’s a Closed Loop, a Daisychain.
        THE NARRATIVE shall be maintained.
        Any data outside of this closed loop is demonized, anyone that speaks out is a Denier!
        Typical PsyOp.

  13. Between Purdue and Pfizer, Big Pharma has nothing to brag about and much to explain. Anyone who believes anything that comes from them, at this point, is a fool .

    1. Add Cutter Labs to that, unless the “lifesaving” vaccine that gives kids polio is no big deal.

      Operation Warpspeed rammed through a so-called vaccine with experimental technology without sufficient testing, and people died, many of them children or healthy adults. Killer Marmao likes to bray about all “studies” done on the Covid “vaccines” but they didn’t go through a fraction of what was needed considering the VAERS reactions. Peter McCullough notes on Rogan that other meds were pulled with far lesser adverse effects than the covid jab.

      Sorry, Trump: you own the fast-tracking of vaccine that ended up killing people instead of saving them. And you stood behind Fraudci, who – if there were any justice in the world would get through a speedy trial and spend his remaining years in a 8×10 cell or walk a final 13-foot staircase upwards.

      Anyone claiming stats that the jabs “prevented million lives” is ignorant on how statistics work. Worse yet are the idiots who got the jab and then full-blown wuflu and then exclaim “I’m so glad I got the shot! I’d have been much sicker”.

      They deserve their next booster. So does trudeasecu, at least a dozen at once so he stays healthy for us.

      You too, Marmot – go load up on your next “booster” and see how it goes. Maybe you’ll be lucky and it won’t be the kill shot.

      mhb23re

      1. I’ve said for a while that Trump has some ‘splainin’ to do about O.W. For all his bluster, he was either trustingly naive or in on it. I tend to lean toward the former but either way, it’s not much of a recommendation.

        1. “I’ve said for a while that Trump has some ‘splainin’ to do about O.W. For all his bluster, he was either trustingly naive or in on it. I tend to lean toward the former but either way, it’s not much of a recommendation.”

          Agreed. Donald Trump, for all his faults is at least not corrupt. The only President ever to leave office poorer than when he went it, wasn’t he?

  14. Why would anyone submit themselves to medical experiment and coerced injection of unknown substance financed and owned by “an investment firm” like Blackrock.
    Larry Fink and Blackrock are the ones that brought the fake “vaccine”.

    Why would people take a drug imposed by a so called “investment firm”… ?… its like taking health advice from Bill Gates or a Bank executive, or advice on raising children from Jeffery Epstien.

  15. Here’s a fun time waster. Google COVID vaccine effectiveness in stopping transmission.
    All the lies are still up there from 2021. From Lancet, NEJM, CDC etc. And of course our most trustworthy media, CBC, NBC, AP, Reuters etc. Surprised no one from the CIA ordered a cleanse like they do with Wikipedia.
    They went from – it will stop transmission to – we never said it will stop transmission to – they weren’t developed to stop transmission in a very short timeline.

      1. “I clearly remember, “If you get the shot, you WILL NOT get the disease.””

        Same here. And I didn’t even question that, at first, because that’s the *whole point* of any vaccine.

  16. It’s funny how anxiety and regret about the potential consequences of a bad decision causes some folks to behave.

  17. My wife and I both got covid at the same time, her double jabbed, me none, besides the fact that she was very sick for 4 days from her second jab, the covid hit her harder than me and I recovered faster even though I am 5 1/2 years older and not vaxed. So am I to believe my lying eyes or the legacy media’s/government narrative that now tells us if we get the jab we will not be as sick. They said before that 95% of those vaxed would not get covid, they lied.

    1. I know jabbed people that have each had it 3 times.
      Each time they get it, it’s worse, sick for 3 weeks last time.
      Others fully jabbed, get these colds that they just can’t shake off. In one case, she’s got it for 8 weeks so far. Age 60. Yes, we are concerned about these friends health, even if a couple of them did ghost us thru the worst of the Covid debacle.

  18. Why would anyone make so many posts in defense of this unless they were being paid to do so? I think the varmint must work for Pfizer.

    1. “Why would anyone make so many posts in defense of this unless they were being paid to do so? I think the varmint must work for Pfizer.”

      Perhaps, but he earned a little respect today by admitting a slight misinterpretation of the results of some studies. Doesn’t happen often around here.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation