Because nothing says “transparency” like conducting family business using code names.
Call this the Pierre Delecto Twist in the Case of the Influence-Peddling Bidens. Where Mitt Romney adopted a nom de plume for social-media sock puppetry, Joe Biden apparently put his pseudonym to a more, ah, commercial use. Or so says House Oversight chair James Comer, who alleges that Biden used the name “Robert L. Peters” as a way to hide his involvement in Hunter Biden’s Ukraine affairs.
This morning, Comer told the National Archives to dig deep to produce all such communications under that name and to remove the redactions.
“Robert L. Peters” does bear a passing resemblance to “Pedo Pete”.
I wonder where Joe came up with “Robert L. Peters”?
I would have thought he would have used something like Robert Michael Blind, or “Rob M. Blind” for short. 🙂
Oh man! What are they going to charge Trump with now?
Have we discovered his private server yet? Is it located in the rafters above his gas-guzzling Corvette? Out in the shed, with all the TOP SECRET papers he STOLE from the Archives?
Saw this somewhere:
“Trump about to be indicted for tearing as label off as mattress.”
Except for the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Private Bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to Hunter, the two business partners saying Joe is the “brand,” the “big guy,” and “the chairman,” the two whistleblowers’ testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is simply no evidence at all of Joe Biden being involved.