39 Replies to “I, Napoleon”

      1. When the truth is an insult, what can you do but insult people who don’t want to hear the truth?

  1. Do the same people who support “gender affirming” mutilation of children also approve of FGM of minor girls?

    1. Bucky, they certainly seem to have no issue with it. Bring FGM up inna conversation w/ a Prog sometime, find out.

      I’ve asked the question here before: If Red Rachel gets in & introduces the Somali curriculum like she’s promised, where is she going to be talking about jihad, high seas piracy and FGM? Social studies? Health? Sex ed? Religion? CALM?

  2. The counter to those who howl “transphobic”, is to label them as “Pragmaticophobic”.

  3. The first eleven or so paragraphs retells how much of a homo he was before homo was cool. Yeah, we get it, another article about gays and… me me me me me, look at me I’m so gay. No way he played lacrosse though. The girls relying on their speed and skills while the boys just liked to shove each other? Never happened. I suppose there is a point to the story somewhere, but 3/4 of the way in it’s still about me, me, me and me.

      1. [sigh…] made it through the whole thing. The dissonance escapes the author. He sees the lies coming from the Trans community while ignoring the lies of the homosexual community, because, as he says, he’s being true to himself.

        He is unable (or refuses) to see the possibility that his own breaking homosexuality may also have been a result of some form of gender confusion.

    1. Perhaps I belong in an earlier era, when newly liberated gays and lesbians rebelled against the medical and psychiatric experiments they had long been subjected to.

      No … you belong in an earlier era when Pfffagggs were shoved into the closet and OUT of everyone’s consciousness. Because you see, your unhappiness with the latest “progressive” Trans movement is no different than the unhappiness the vast majority of the NORMAL world feels about your gay awakening and gay “marriage” … it’s just as fraudulent as your discomfort with girls. Sure, you admired the way girls played Lacrosse (what a crock) … but you weren’t interested in their quivering quims. No, you felt more comfortable taking a boys Pennis up your bottom. You prance around and pretend your bottom is a girls vagina. That’s sick. You’re sick … just as sick as any Trans-woman getting forced as a child to take puberty blockers. You’re blind to the parallels … because you don’t like being FORCED to accept the depravity of Trans bigotry … but you love shoving your butt-buddy deathstyle down our throats … and pretending you’re “married”. Meh. Go away.

      1. ^^^ THIS!!! ^^^ /\/\/\/\/\/\

        (although I wouldn’t have been so blunt, I totally agree with the sentiment.)

        1. Apologies for the crudeness … but sometimes it is warranted as this backlash is long overdue. And no, I don’t hate the gays … I just don’t ever want to see a rainbow flag flying over a U.S. Embassy EVER AGAIN. Stop FORCING behaviour. Stop bullying the straights.

      2. You were doing fine until this:

        “That’s sick. You’re sick … just as sick as any Trans-woman getting forced as a child to take puberty blockers.”

        Nothing sick about it. Consenting gay adults = no harm done. Trans anything is mutilation of psychologically vulnerable. And when this is done to children it is monstrous.

        1. “Consenting gay adults” demanding rainbow flags be flown over our Embassies crosses all the lines. Gay consent is abnormal. Do I care? No. So long you don’t flaunt and display your depravity on floats, in gay parades. Keep it in your own bedroom, and don’t proselytize the straights.

          1. I have no objection to what you’re saying. But this has nothing to do with anything trans. Also there is a difference between gays and those who make “being gay a full time occupation” (a phrase borrowed from Douglas Murray who himself is gay, check out his book “The Madness of the Crowds”).

        2. No harm is a bold claim. The Chesterons fence keeping gays in the closet is possibly the most well established and ubiquitous there is. There’s probably more human cultures banning the gay than cultures banning ritual murders and revenge killings.

          Classical philosophers? Gays have no virtue. Late Roman poets, gays mark the decline of Rome. Chrislam? Both ban it. Buddah? Gays can’t attain enlightenment. Commies like Stalin or Che? Gays can’t be revolutionaries and should be considered enemies of the state. On and on and on from all sides.

          Basically just Babylonian Talmud Judaism supports it, and even then mainly for enemies they want to destroy.

          Don’t ask don’t tell and keep it in the closet seems to work fine in a lot of cases. But out in public proud gay is something most everyone of worth agrees is an abomination.

          I think most people don’t get the word abomination. It means,’ this thing is a bad omen for your society and if you let it get out of hand your people are screwed. ‘

          The idea that it doesn’t cause harm is a pretty damn radical claim I see people rattling offhand a lot with nothing to back it up. We have volumes of work from basic every major civilization arguing it causes great harm both to the individual and society. I’ve never really seen a coherent counter argument to any of that.

          1. ‘I have no objection to what you’re saying. But this has nothing to do with anything trans. ‘

            It’s the same irrationality innit? Trans divorced gender and generation just like gay divorced sex and sexual union.

            Folks wanking each other off isn’t equivalent to actual sex which engenders new life for the human race. It’s madness to act like there is any equivalency there, just like it’s madness to act like a self-nutered eunic is really whatever gender it claims to have changed too.

          2. “Folks wanking each other off isn’t equivalent to actual sex which engenders new life for the human race.”

            Hate to break it to you but most of the time when people have sex they do so for fun and they really do not want to produce offspring as result of the act. It is also harmless. Anyway, you’re neither interesting nor relevant.

          3. You really do have your head up your colon dont you?

            The aggregate knowledge and experience of the whole world doesn’t mean a lick to you so long as you can support the current thing and get your cummies.

            Hell is too good for most modern men: had Dante lived now he would have to invent so many more and deeper circles.

          4. You do not speak for “the aggregate knowledge and experience of the whole world”, you speak for “the aggregate [lack of] knowledge and [lack of] experience” of yourself. You inability to attract anyone interested in being intimate with you is not a virtue it is your failure. You can’t stand that others can enjoy themselves, so like a typical liberal you want them to be as miserable as you are.

            Those who preach purity the loudest tend to have particularly nasty interests. You should confront them instead of throwing stones in your glass house.

            “…get your cummies…”

            My “cummies” are none of your business but if you are interested in finding them talk to your mother.

  4. Well Gee, I guess I’m a transphobe as well. Sorry, I just can’t be bothered to give this crap much head time. I simply don’t care enough to have a concern for 0.3% of the population. I don’t care what they do in their little bubbles, but I sure get pissed that they DEMAND I find what they do acceptable, and what their activists push for, is normal or rational. Leave me and mine the F alone and I will leave you and yours the F alone, but insist I participate in your sick pastimes, and like it, is going to far, and it will likely get you a bloody nose, from me, or perhaps worse!

    1. Only 0.3% of the population? From the amount of media attention they get, I would have guessed they are at least 6.66% of the population. (666, the devil’s number)

  5. It’s a really roundabout way to do it, but this is the most successful way to wipe out homosexuals yet. There have to be a lot of homosexuals getting mutilated now.
    Isn’t it interesting how Iran is ahead of the west on this? Or is it that the west is taking a cue from Iran?

  6. The LGB folks desperately need to distance themselves from the rest of the alphabet people. They’re just different, they’re not insane and demanding that we participate in their insanity.

  7. I always thought a lot of gay people had more issues than just target identification but, what the hell, it’s a free country when it comes to everything but Covid 19. We were asked for tolerance. When we gave it, they then demanded that they set the whole agenda and they’re all fkcuing weird.

  8. ’73 SCOTUS decision on gay marriage was the top of the slippery slope, so I guess you could say we’re almost there…once pedophilia is normalized, and it will be, consider that to be rock bottom.
    The price of moral relativism. Enjoy.

    1. No… Pedophilia isn’t the rock bottom. I’m sure that there are way more sinister perversions that the “in” crowd hasn’t even begun to get around to. I’ve heard of a few, and I don’t like where this is going. Probably there are far worse than even what we are aware of. People are taking satanism a lot more seriously for example, or haven’t you noticed.

  9. I was a queer bully and these trans bullies are horrible because I am authentic writes the at one time 33-year-old college student. Exactly the outcome you’d expect.

    1. Yeah … 33 yo college student. I wonder if he went out for the women’s lacrosse team … since only girls know how to play the sport … and he could run faster than an 18yo girl who’s started to put on her “mothering hips” and the freshman 15

  10. Someone should educate the writer on John Money and what he did to David Reimer and Reimer’s Brother…

  11. A) I have no dog in this fight.
    B) Amusing to watch a guy who’s made a career of throwing the straights under the bus get thrown under the bus.
    C) Even more amusing to watch him realize that the trogs and rednecks he hates (that would be all of us) are the ONLY people defending his right to speak.

    Popcorn. Mmm.

  12. One must wonder…
    In 5000 plus years of written history, most major societies and religions have come to reject and ostracize homosexuality….
    Has this been a result of an ingrained bigotry in human psychology as the average LGTBQFU activist would have us believe? Or, is it maybe that every time societies have allowed and normalized deviant behavior, they have tread onto a steep slippery slope that ends with the fatal fall off a cliff?

Navigation