Finally it all makes sense.
LA Times- Skittles ‘unfit for human consumption,’ California lawsuit claims
The group said TiO2 particles posed concern for genotoxicity, meaning a substance that has the ability to damage a person’s DNA and may cause cancer. The EFSA said that after the ingredient is taken by mouth, the absorption of titanium dioxide particles was low but could accumulate in the body.
There’s absolutely nothing else in the last few years that someone might put in their body that could alter their DNA.
But remember kids: glyphosate is perfectly safe.
Well, if your DNA gets changed, it was this stuff, not the Vax.
Didn’t they say the same thing about aspartame a couple of decades ago?
You got a better explanation why Millenials are so low IQ?
Several actually. Starting with the educational system, and go from there.
U meen da edukayshun sistem?
As long as you don’t eat the purple skittles you’re good.
I’m telling every alfalfa-eating vaxxer I know that the reason I didn’t get jabbed is because I heard that Pfizer is a subsidiary of Monsanto. 🙂
First they came for the ju jubes
Most of the shit filling our grocery stores’ middle aisles is “unfit for human consumption”. Skittles are probably closer to being the rule than the exception.
As a diehard loyal CAL BEARS fan … I was a huge Marshawn Lynch fan. But it does appear as the older and richer he got … the crazier he became. And yes … he was Skittles consumer #1 in the World.
https://twitter.com/sports22384807/status/1169728576360452096
TiO2 nano-particles are also used in sunscreen. Watch them ban it, and blame the resultant increase in skin cancer rates on “climate change” or covid.
It’s less dangerous than BPA, which was perfectly safe, while the substances used to replace it sometimes are not.
“Health” authorities are no longer fit for purpose.
I seem to recall someone calculating that to get to anything like a dangerous level of BPA you’d have to eat several kilos of plastic bottles.
“Health” authorities are no longer fit for purpose
Indeed, who will ever listen to their future admonitions.
Yet another cover story… right up there with gardening and walking on beaches. There’s a whole slew of “high-risk” behaviors making their way onto the pages of your friendly neighborhood newspapers, and your 6-o-clock newscasts, recently.
In my entire life I never found Skittles brand anything fit for human consumption. I’ve personally never known anyone who particularly liked them. When I was a younger person working in a grocery store the boxes of Skittles would usually reach their shelf life date and be replaced and I remember having to dust them off. Who actually buys them?! Now with their Rainbow campaign they’re just gross woke ‘candy’
“There’s absolutely nothing else in the last few years that someone might put in their body that could alter their DNA.”
Indeed there isn’t. Unless they put CRISPR Cas protein in with the vaccines, but they didn’t so it won’t.
mRNA vaxs has been found to reverse transcribe into human DNA in the liver.
As usual, you are lying.
No it hasn’t. That was an in vitro liver cell line. A liver cancer cell line at that.
https://www.chop.edu/news/feature-article-no-study-does-not-prove-what-you-think-it-does-part3
And if SARS RNA sequences are being found in human DNA, you know what’s the likely source of that? The SARS COVID virus!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166107/
each little m on m+m candies is made with titanium dioxide…it’s screen printed on them just before they are bagged…used to work at their candy factory