21 Replies to “Safe And Effective ®”

  1. 12% – betting that a vitamin “D”, some exercise, and fresh air can beat 12% effectiveness, with 100% less side effects.

    1. 12%…..that’s a rounding error only.

      GVB has said any vaccine that is 50% effective, is essentially useless.

      All government data has shown that kids are safe from Covid, few get sick, but it is not a fatal disease to healthy kids. Government ignored this, and wants kids jabbed.

      Murderers.

  2. And yet the illegitimate son of Castro will force the vile goo into every child in Canada. Because that’s what the globohomo satanists demand.

  3. The article was an indirect argument (glaringly obvious) to support mask requirements in schools and make the npc peoples against it.

  4. The 12% effectiveness has 100% to do with Pfizer not working worth a grain of salt on the Omicron Variant for ANY age group. There’s Lies, Damn Lies and then Pharma-Stats. In Alberta there’s actually more new cases coming from vax Boosted people percentage-wise then the percent of Albertans that are vax Boosted. 105% Useless at stopping the spread.

  5. That “12%” is almost certainly relative risk too. So, for that age range with their 99.99+% recovery rate it’s maybe 0.0012% in absolute terms. So probably about as effective as wrapping up warm.

    Only this comes with the risk of side effects

  6. Probably within the margin of error. I’d bet it’s 100% useless at best. Everyone in my house got it and we’re all vaccinated. The one who got it worse was boooooooooosted. Anyway it was a bad cold.

  7. Too many varying factors. I don’t see how you can quantify a percentage that low in determination of effectiveness. Also, the study is not peer reviewed. And, an agenda is rearing it’s ugly head being that those doing the study blamed the lower dosage for the “dramatic drop” in effectiveness. That would be called wishful speculation…not science.

    This seems like nonsense being used to justify their actions and beliefs. Paging through the study I noticed no mention of diet, sex, ancestral origin, pre-existing medical conditions, or daily habits inclusive of social interaction. Also, there is no consideration for behavior prior to exposure such as overuse of prescription medications, failure to eat a balanced meal on a regular basis, family historical genetic weaknesses.

    Nonsense.

    1. Well, “peer review” is hardly the word of God. In fact, it is often referred to as “Pal review”.

  8. Effective by what measures… over how long of a time frame… over which racial diversity… over which age groups specifically did it change… how much money did you receive from the government, or from a university, to fund this study?

    And most importantly, did you fly a flag on your car over the past months. AND WHO DO YOU VOTE FOR?

    Honk you!

  9. “The dramatic drop in vaccine effectiveness was likely due to the lower dosage the youngsters received, according to study team members.”

    This just keeps getting stupider. If children are not prone to getting COVID, it seems this jab is causing it.

  10. Let me rewrite that: Pfizer’s clot shot was 88% useless and carries significant unwarranted risks, meaning that no government that was not banal, bought and utterly evil would allow it to be administered.

  11. 2 more people I know had strokes last week and it’s serious. That’s 7 I know that have had heart or stoke problems in the last 6 months. I know it can happen , but this is way above normal.

  12. Not one of the shots achieved anything more than zero efficacy. Period.

Navigation