Milder, Less Severe Deaths

Zerohedge- 8 Dead, 80 Infected In Fully-Vaccinated Connecticut Nursing Home

The nursing home said, “We are obviously concerned we experienced some level of waning immunity.”

Global- Fully vaccinated seniors made up nearly half of B.C.’s COVID-19 deaths in October

National Library of Medicine- Imperfect vaccines and the evolution of pathogen virulence

The subsequent evolution leads to higher levels of intrinsic virulence and hence to more severe disease in unvaccinated individuals. This evolution can erode any population-wide benefits such that overall mortality rates are unaffected, or even increase, with the level of vaccination coverage. In contrast, infection-blocking vaccines induce no such effects, and can even select for lower virulence.

Safe And Effective ®

34 Replies to “Milder, Less Severe Deaths”

    1. Among senior deaths in B.C., 82 were vaccinated and 89 were not.

      But about 90% of seniors are fully vaccinated. If the vaccines had no effect, the ratio would be 9 to 1, not 1 to 1.

      1. Another believer in the Doomsday Argument, I see.
        If you don’t know what that is, do a search for it and understand it.

      2. And the data set that would be REALLY interesting is the number of seniors in nursing homes, etc., died within 28 days of receiving their “life saving vaccine”.

      3. That one to one ratio doesn’t suggest to you that vaccination made little to no difference? If this keeps up the fully vaccinated nursing home inmates are going to have to get different causes of death, e.g. flu, to sustain the narrative.

  1. I notice how the Global story still manages to push the increasingly-implausible “just-so” explanation that “it’s those unvaccinated people that are killing Grandma.”

    Suuuuuuure.

    1. Global is right! My unjabbed buddies and I sneak into retirement homes in the middle of the night and do some loud carolling. It’s fool proof!

  2. WTF ??? – The concern is unvaccinated people are still passing the virus on to the older, vaccinated population.

    1. The concern is unvaccinated people are still passing the virus on to the older, vaccinated population.

      That concern is based on ignorant / stupid people being propagandised.

      Vaccinated people pass on the virus as much as unvaccinated people. Neither should matter if the vaccines offer protection.

      1. Yep never mind most of those that work in those old folks homes are vaccinated, so how can they blame the unvaccinated. It’s pure political propaganda.

      2. The “unvaccinated” are the SOLE transmitters of C-19 to old people!? Prove it! Where’s the contact tracing to PROVE it!? And please … count all the fully vaccinated contacts as well.

        How much longer will these Authoritarian Leaders keep LYING about C-19 and the near-USELESS $$multi-billion BIG Pharma “vaccines”?

      3. EXACTLY………. some people just DON’T GET IT or are just too brainwashed to think for themselves………..”I SHALL OBEY………..I SHALL OBEY”. sheesh

    2. So according to your “thesis”, the vaccines don’t provide protection? By the way…the “vaccines” are “imperfect” which means the vaccinated hosts can produce more dangerous pathogens to pass on.

  3. A spokesman for the Covid-19 virus collective says they are not going to be put off by the puny efforts of Pfizer et al.

    “That which doesn’t kill us makes us stronger.”

  4. The Ottawa Senators hockey team has 100% vaccination and 40% of the team were diagnosed with Covid. All games were cancelled this past week. And no one questions the necessity to jab 5 year old chikdren?

    1. Not in this country, no.

      I actually tried a little bit on Reddit earlier today. Every comment I made, down voted to oblivion. It occurred to me that vaccine proponents simply automatically assume that anyone attempting to rationally discuss the issue or expressing some concern, is doing so out of bad faith. They’re a filthy anti vaxxer and earn no benefit of doubt or honest discussion. It’s ridicule and scorn and contempt, immediate and relentless.

      It’s religious zeal. You’d have no more success trying to convince a true believer in religion X that they are wrong and must convert to religion Y.

      1. I am surprised a moderator didn’t step in and ban you from posting for 7 days for such a bad score. When you post on Reddit be prepared for the fascists, the communists, the Nazis, the socialists, the lefties, the loosers to give you a blast for speaking the truth.

  5. I’d be curious to know if BC lumps the recently vaccinated (less than 21 days) in with the unvaccinated.

    1. In the absence of human doses of Ivermectin that’s a good idea – so long as you administer early enough.

      By the way, you don’t need apostrophes for plurals.

      1. That would be spell check on my phone. Driving down the highway and posting is a tricky thing

        You do know that M Friesen and Mac Parhar would have tried Ivermectin. IT DID NOT WORK.

        1. Your lack of driving skills are still affecting your writing skills.

          No medicine is 100% effective.

          1. Isn’t texting-and-driving an abject behaviour that can lead to life-altering injuries and even death, while putting the lives of others in danger?! Oh, my, the irony.

    2. Stay ignorant my pungent friend….

      AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS

      Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

      Kory, Pierre MD1,*; Meduri, Gianfranco Umberto MD2; Varon, Joseph MD3; Iglesias, Jose DO4; Marik, Paul E. MD5

      “The Panel FOUND THE CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE FOR IVERMECTIN’S EFFECTS ON SURVIVAL TO BE STRONG AND THEY RECOMMENDED UNCONDITIONAL ADOPTION FOR USE IN THE PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT OF COVID-19.

      In summary, based on the totality of the trials and epidemiologic evidence presented in this review along with the preliminary findings of the Unitaid/WHO meta-analysis of treatment RCTs and the guideline recommendation from the international BIRD conference, IVERMECTIN SHOULD BE GLOBALLY AND SYSTEMATICALLY DEPLOYED IN THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF COVID-19.”

      https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/06000/review_of_the_emerging_evidence_demonstrating_the.4.aspx

  6. So only 8 of the covid-related deaths were non-seniors (out of 179). Any numbers on heart attack deaths for the month (and their demographics)?

  7. Two years and the so called experts’ cling to their failed vaccine policy, still no viable treatment for those that get sick. At what point is it criminal negligence via our healthcare experts and doctors? Keep blaming the un-vaccinated, the media will give those liars cover, but it won’t stop the truth from coming out.

    1. The “viable” treatment is coming in the form of the very expensive PfizerMercktins that will find their way into the market in a very expeditious way.

    2. Yes Rose, 2 years and still no light at the end of the tunnel. Vaccinologists like Bhakdi and Yeadon among others have been proven correct in their assessment of the likely outcome of our little experiment and for their efforts they were relegated to the lunatic fringe, banned from social media; international pariahs unable to communicate the reasons for their skeptical stance. Madness.

Navigation