25 Replies to “Dueling Doctors on Vaccines”

  1. Doctors need a reminder of an oath that they are supposed to be there for the health of their clients and not the wealth they gain from their clients…

    Ops, forgotten, they’re paid by the government and now mandated to their policies.

    1. It has been my (perhaps lucky) experience that most doctors are conscientious and ethical. And if they don’t stand up and speak out, then they are merely reflecting the characteristics of most Canadians.

  2. Why are these experts so bad at answering questions or on being interviewed? He lost my interest about 2 minutes in.

  3. I tuned out when the second guest refused to respond to risks cited for younger vaccine recipients, offering no scientific rebuttal.
    No science from the scientist, just patronizing nothing is 100% and don’t politicize as he anecdotally assures us of no media issues.
    Maybe because he’s towing the line. Pure speculation my part, but this bullshit diversion and refusal to address science is over.
    Full stadiums in the US while Canadians languish in masks in little gatherings, hoping for a bit more restored freedom – someday.
    I want to be free of power hunger and dishonest politicians.

    1. Shamrock, do you know of a time — any time in history — when the majority of politicians were not power hungry, and the majority were only somewhat honest?

      1. Not like now. Not with the current totalitarian media running unconditional interference for DeMarxists and their faked issues of race, gender and climate change, prepared to decide who gets rule of law and who doesn’t, who speaks the truth and who doesn’t, and who deserves mistreatment and who doesn’t, all to support their self-fulfilling/serving prophesies.

        Now with censors as their allies. Now unchecked by voters. The ebbs and flows of political thought, where yes power is important for legislative agenda, but not like the DeMarxist of today of power for itself, of their wealth and prestige, not issues, not problems for nation, further contaminated by their reversal of the Trump agenda, which is mostly bad news for citizens of usurping courts, or keeping uncurious voters in the dark with social media censorship, of hyperpartisan tribal politics that make 1968 look like unanimous utopia, of tackling what the totalitarians say are the big issues of the day, which have always required wide consent of society, but longer, with minorities cobbled to support false narratives.

        Hope that clears things up for you.

  4. I have a lot of respect for Roy Green and have listened to him for quite a while. I’ll be the first to say that there was something off with him in this segment. He sounded like he was a little edgy or walking on egg shells with this one. He should have asked his second guest ” if there is no mandate from Gov’t. to not print opposing views why if they do address the subject it’s to do a character assassination of the person and not rebut the message”. There is an old saying in radio ” shoot the message and not the messenger” …..SteveO

  5. Roy Green sounded pretty darn happy of completing week 2 following his 2nd jab of Pfizer. His dismissive handling of mRNA inventor Dr. Malone was PeeWee level talk radio. I guess Mr. Green didn’t want to hear the truth that he chose to put something in himself that may have medical consequences. Denial is a strong emotion and my impression was that a normally reasonable Roy Green came off like a bit of an A-hole possibly because of it. It doesn’t change the facts that the Covid vaccines have been pushed way beyond the original emergency use approval and adverse reaction data suppressed to the grave detriment of many individuals.

    1. Agreed. Typical ‘mind is already made up’ interviewer when talking to Malone and happy to have his confirmation bias confirmed when speaking to the second doctor who, as far as I’m concerned, might as well be a government or Big Pharma spokesman. Either way, there is enough reason for concern that no one should be forced or coerced into taking one of these.

    2. “His dismissive handling of mRNA inventor Dr. Malone”
      and his standard dodge for Dr. Malone, “We’re all out of time”
      No Roy, you were all out of time for Dr. Malone’s ideas. You’ve bought yourself a lemon Roy, and for you at your age it probably won’t matter but for a youngster just starting out in life there could be huge negative consequences down the road.

  6. I have dozens of papers on virology and I go with the people who say it is dangerous to take any gene altering shots. The spike protein may just kill you when the right virus or flu bug comes around.

  7. Shamrock, do you know of a time — any time in history — when the majority of politicians were not power hungry, and the majority were only somewhat honest?

  8. Government always attracts a high percentage of sociopaths. You pretty much need to be a sociopath to believe you have the moral authority to impose your small vision of the world on other people. Virtually every political leader in Canada today is a sociopath. They are arrogant, unable to feel what ordinary people feel and dismissive of the pain they cause. Ultimately, if we want freedom, it will be at the cost of blood. Not yet, but that day might not be far off. You don’t get rid of tyrants by means of pleasant discussions about their political vision. You just say NO! Are you ready to say NO to the tyrants in Ottawa and Toronto who mean to wreck your life?

  9. CBC had an article today about dispelling he myths about the vaccines. The “expert” cheerfully assues us that there is no evidence of any risk to fertility. Never int he history of vaccines has any vaccine ever been proven to cause infertility.

    First off that just plain wrong since the HPV vaccine has been associated (but it is not known to be causal) with primary ovarian insufficiency. The jury is still out on that one.

    Second, never in the history of vaccines did we ever induce production of a toxic spike protein that accumulates in the ovaries and testis.

    Third not enough time has passed to know if there is any infertility issues in those who have had the vaccine so to say there is no evidence is true because it’s too soon to know.

    Overall I found the CBC expert to be glib, excessively sure of his facts, and lacking nuance.

    1. Just straight up lying through his teeth.
      Trust me, I’m a self appointed expert.

      1. Yes straight up lying is about right. Certainly anyone who is advised by him for informed consent is not being properly advised. Therefore there is no informed consent from this guy.

  10. and this whole shit show painted the cuckservatives for what they really are, liberals under a different banner!

  12. Everyone with a time machine knows the score on the long term effects of the vaccines.

  14. Roy is invested in his personal decision.
    Therefore his bias comes out. Very unprofessional. Listening John G?

    “To save 3 we kill 2”. Unbelievable!!!

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation