30 Replies to “Your Moral And Intellectual Superiors”

  1. But the truth is…..we don’t need fewer “unemployed journalists”….we need MORE “unemployed journalists”. Kind of like we need fewer lawyers.

  3. Macrons forces are literally hitting & killing citizens. the UN human rights committee is silent as France, the prized poster child of the EU, is in shambles. This is why the right to bear arms is important. When people are powerless, the government does this!

    Wtf and we want to be part of a club that does this to its citizens people who want us to stay in the EU want to wake up before this type of stuff is happening on our streets

    Our “government” is quietly shipping over 5000 Muslims per week into Britain that will eventually do the job for them. I don’t think the British people are aware of the evil that faces them, and by the time they are, it will be too late. I feel so sorry for Britain’s children.

    Read the tweets here:
    https://mobile.twitter.com/RitRatRoo/status/1092561727001116672

    1. re: cultural appropriation, feel free to use this argument against the very *concept*

      ‘cultural appropriation’.
      based on the claim cultural group X is the only and FIRST to adopt some identifiable practice.
      Q: to the snowflakes:
      how the HELL do you idjits KNOW with irrefutable, definitive certainty ONE HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE TIME, that the give practice was started by one of your OWN? hmmm?
      in this case, HOW can it be claimed that dreadlocks began with blacks? go way back to caveman days, to a tribe that was destined to be the distant ancestors of WHITES, and, egad, one of the kids was THE. FIRST. HUMAN. ON. THE. FACE. OF. THE. EARTH. TO. TIE. THEIR. LONG. CAVEMAN. HAIR. IN. BRAIDS. AKA. DREADLOCKS? and thus for thousands of years it is periodically duplicated. randomly.
      hmmm? THEY were the pioneers, therefore THEY have DYBS on it.
      so 1,000 generations later, blacks, *on their own*, likewise this time in large numbers take up the practice but forevermore are
      NOT the ones to start it. but do so for whatever reason.
      so it appears to me, that the basis of ‘cultural appropriation’ depends on WHO commandeers a practice, artifact, habit, norm, wtfEVER.
      and then DEMAND they ALONE are allowed to do so. (see: ‘cultural appropriation’)
      so in this scenario, just who in hell is REALLY doing the ‘appropriation’ by BULLYING their way into dominance?
      hmmmm?
      my point stands regardless and CANNOT be refuted unless the one contradicting has that ‘irrefutable, definitive certainty ONE HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE TIME’ PROOF *their* special group came up with it first. that is an impossibility given how long humans have occupied the planet.
      conclusion: claims of ‘cultural appropriation’ are solely based on BULLYING.
      nothing new about that.

  6. I don’t know who Jonathan S. Kingston is, but he won the internet for February 3 with that tweet.

  7. Bud Light mocked its rivals Coors and Miller in a super bowl add where corn syrup is delivered to a Medieval castle. “But we don’t put corn syrup in our beer” says the Bud Light brewer. “It must belong to Coors. They put corn syrup in their beer”.

    They trudge the corn syrup over to the Coors castle. “Here is your corn syrup” to which a reply “We already have ours. It must belong to the Miller castle”.

    Pretty funny add. I am just paraphrasing because I don’t watch sports (and therefore these commercials). But if you want to see what has happened to the MSM google “super bowl mocks corn syrup”. It’s basically the same link over and over explaining that corn syrup is used for fermenting and not as a sweetener. So what is barley used for and why is the MSM trying to convince us that corn syrup does not affect the taste of the beer? Did the corn growers write the article and then get the MSM to paraphrase it?

    1. I’ve never been impressed with Budweiser ‘beer’. Maybe its the rice they use to make Budweiser.

      2. The original (and best) Budweiser is sold in North America as Czechvar. It is sold in Europe as Budweiser.

        No comparison. The Yank stuff is fairy piss.

      3. Actually they have bags under the horses to collect their special beer and pump it directly to the barrels on the wagon.

    2. A-B InBev (Budweiser) mocking anybody about beer ingredients is the ultimate irony. Rice, anyone?

      The reason corn syrup is used is because it’s less expensive than barley malt, contains more fermentable sugars than barley malt and has fewer byproducts than barley malt to clean up afterwards.

      It also contributes very little taste to the finished product (similar to, say, rice) as opposed to barley malt, making it the perfect ersatz drink for little weenie boyz & girlz who shy away from the taste of real beer.

      1. I’ve brewed my own beer for nearly 25 years. For a few years, I made it from scratch and I’ve sometimes added different malts. Depending on which I’ve used, I could change the colour and flavour of the beer.

        I remember when a variety of wheat beer was available in the grog shop here in Alberta. It wasn’t bad, but not terribly interesting.

        Those wimpy Bud types should try making Russian Imperial stout, something I’d like to try to make some day. It produces 8% alcohol and uses about twice as much hops as, say, lager. (Talk about a quick way to get sozzled!) Some wag referred to it as beer you can chew!

        1. It’s been decades since I made my own beer & then all I used was extracts. Good for you!

          As an unapologetic craft beer snob, it’s a great time to be a beer drinker.

          I have a half dozen or so different Russian Imperial Stouts ageing in the cellar. They range from 9.x to 14.x %ABV and the oldest is vintage 2013. With this polar vortex chill on, it may be time to free one of them. 🙂

          1. Russian Imperial stout at 14%? Woo-hoo! The 8% figure I mentioned came from Charlie Papasian’s book when I stumbled across the recipe for it.

            Once I’m done settling my father’s estate, I’ll go back to making my beer from scratch. For the last few years, I’ve been using kits and I’ve been getting consistent results. Speaking of which, I have a batch that’s been ready for bottling for a while, but I don’t have enough empties yet. I’ll have to wait for a Saturday afternoon when there’s a decent opera on the Met broadcast over the CBC and work on it then.

          2. These are commercial versions. The 14.4% one is the 2018 version of this:

            http://www.beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/132/217692

            These ones have been whiskey barrel aged for 9 months. Picked them up in Missoula, Montana late last spring, on a trip to attend Garden City Brewfest. They’ll have to sit for another year or so before I crack one of them.

            Fortunately I have other options.

  8. Does ‘going negative’ on your competitor help increase business or not?
    I’ve noticed the fat little guy from A&W has kind of toned down the hormone free burger thing.
    The problem I see with that angle is the consumer simply forgets which product he’s supposed to avoid and ends up buying less from all of them.

          1. Burgers made for inhabitants of Alpha Lyrae? They must be good if they’re willing to travel 26 light years for them!

  9. Tim Young (on Twitter): “How many unemployed journalists could have been hired instead of wasting $5.2 million on that Washington Post #SuperBowl ad?”

    All arguments about the MSM aside, Young predictably fails to understand the nature of the media business here. It’s not the purpose of the Washington Post to subsidize journalists. Last time I checked, The Post was a private corporation, perfectly entitled to spend its revenues as its owners and its shareholders see fit. That might mean hiring more journalists or it might mean firing more of them, according to the business model it has adopted.

    The executives at The Post seem to have thought five million dollars for a Super Bowl ad was a fair price to achieve some visibility for their paper. Personally, I’m not so sure.* But it was their call, not mine. And certainly not Young’s either.

    * Spending the five million just to hire more journalists strikes me as a far poorer expenditure though. The Post seems to have plenty of scribblers and hacks.

    1. jeezus JJM, you are good at missing the point. Just as you were when equalization wuz being discussed.

      Math is hard

      logic is harder

      and context appears to be impossible for you

  10. When you join the ranks of the pamphleteers, what do you imagine is your employability bargaining chip?

    I’m sure they already have computer programs that write the unending single-view pap that plops out of its meat grinder each day. #learntocode

  11. From the Global (fake) News website:

    “AD BLOCKER DETECTED
    Advertising revenue employs Canadian journalists in your local community. By choosing to view ads you help support their work. ”

    Sorry, Glow Balls, you’ll have to make do with my portion of the 650MM that Little Potato gave you.

  12. Once the wall is built, if unemployed journalists still want work, they are welcome to do the farm work they say white people won’t do. There will be plenty to do.

    Coding can be outsourced to India.

  13. So I had to view the WAPO commercial online as I must have dozed-off when it was broadcast during the Superbore. I wasn’t “moved”. Their theme of “knowledge is empowerment” is fine, however the WAPO represses knowledge … skews knowledge … omits knowledge. Hell! They outright LIE! esp. about MY President. The BIG media stranglehold on knowledge is OVER. It’s BEEN over for some time now. So the WAPO’s multi-billionaire owner spends $5.4M on a virtue-signaling advertisement in a desperate attempt to reclaim relevance in a world of “open source” … knowledge. The dulcet voice of Tom Hanks won’t “save” BIG Media’s death.

    I was particularly OFFENDED by the image flashed on the screen with the caption … “When our nation is threatened”. The WAPO chose to show an image of a bombed-out Murrah Federal Building. One would think that an image of the WTC on fire and collapsing would have symbolized a more significant threat to our nation. But, the curated “knowledge” served up by the WAPO is so hardcore leftist that it sees ONE random example of a “right wing” Crazy actually “threatens our nation” more than 1.3 billion crazy Muslims who are dedicated to destroying the West.

    Democracy is reviled at the WAPO

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation