Communist Manifesto or Democratic Party Platform?

14 Replies to “Communist Manifesto or Democratic Party Platform?”

1. I came across this collection of quotes by feminists. Try to distinguish these from communism.
   https://medium.com/@svetlanavoreskova/the-primary-goal-of-second-wave-feminism-was-the-destruction-of-the-nuclear-family-507e45b15dd1
   “In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them”
   Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College and associate director of the school’s Center for Research on Woman
   ********************
   “The care of children is infinitely better left to the best trained practitioners of both sexes who have chosen it as a vocation.[This] would further help to undermine family structure while contributing to the freedom of women.”
   Kate Millet, Sexual Politics 178–179
   ********************
   “The nuclear family must be destroyed, and people must find better ways of living together. … Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process.”
   Linda Gordon: President National Organisation of Women USA.
   ********************
   “[The nuclear family is] a cornerstone of woman’s oppression: it enforces women’s dependence on men, it enforces heterosexuality and it imposes the prevailing masculine and feminine character structures on the next generation”
   Alison Jagger, Feminist Politics and Human Nature
   ********************
   But all these feminists are singing of the same hymn sheet as this guy, one of the fathers of communism.
   “The first condition of the liberation of the wife is to bring the whole female sex back into public industry, and this in turn demands the abolition of the monogamous family as the economic unit of society.”
   Fredrick Engels, co Author The Communist Manifesto.

2. Any Democrat who knowingly voted for JugEars McFoodstamp – TWICE – after finding out about him palling around with admitted tertorist Bill Ayers and attending Reverend Wright’s church for two whole decades is a communist in my book. Period. EOS.

3. There is a difference between socialists and communists? I doubt that very much. Both want everyone equal in their misery ruled by an elite with an iron fist. Democrats, Liberals, Socialists – all the same goal in the end game.

4. There is no difference. The destruction of the nuclear family is the agenda of communism.
   Douglas Reed, the only difference between socialists and communists is that communists are in a hurry to implement their agenda and do so by force; while socialists implement their agenda by degrees with gradual brainwashing in the schools and media (see Frankfurt School). The end result is the same, that being no free people.

5. Since the assassination of the Kennedy brothers, it has been the undisguised goal of the Democratic Party to transform the USA into a one-party totalitarian State, in which every detail of every citizens life is overseen by an expanded unelected bureaucracy, and in which policy decisions are made by an oligarchy of party leaders.
   This is a precise mirror of the Soviet Union at the height of its power.

6. There are differences between socialists and communists. Socialists deny that socialism is just a stage on the road to communism. Communists believe that socialism is just a slow road to their end goal. (Both socialism and communism are phases on the way to cannibalism.)

7. Sharing with Liberals/NDPs the Wiki page for “2015 Communist Party of Canada election platform” usually brings about a shrug of their shoulders and, “Who cares what you call it, those are good policies.” The difference between Libs/Dips/Pinkos is negligible.
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_Canada#2015_election_platform

8. manifesto or democrap . . . . .
   ?
   what’s the difference?
   the interviewees seem to have caught on the game real early. LOL !!!

9. We have our own communists in Canada to worry about.
   http://www.poletical.com/a-dark-history-of-the-ndp.php
   they never really go away….
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Democratic_Party_Socialist_Caucus

10. That is patently and latently … disgusting (but thanks for finding and posting that). These whimmen are casting off their own unique, beautiful, and special womanhood … and giving it to “The State” … or their own “collective” of feminist nut jobs. In essence, they simply want to TRANSFER the “oppression” they imagine in the nuclear family … to a new oppression of feminist ideology. Sick. A perfect template for the destruction of society.

11. I prefer Rand’s description of the only difference between socialism and communism (paraphrased) – that socialism is “suicide” as it comes about by the ballot box while communism is simply “murder”. Socialism, at some level is baked into the policies of every political party except perhaps the Libertarians, but in the US, the Democrats have found high gear.

12. Agreed. And let me add, this is NOT your Grandmothers Democrat Party. Her Democrat Party, of JFK, would be labeled a white supremicist hardcore RED State right wing Party. There would be no difference between the rhetoric of Trump and JFK.

13. Hmmm. And if they vote, I’d be willing to bet they’d still vote Democrat.

14. Hayek called them all statists – communists, socialists, Democrats, establishment GOPers, so-called “liberals” (in fact the opposite of actual liberals), progressives, activists, members of the “resistance,” all of them.
    They are all infected with the fatal conceit of collectivism.
    They all believe in the primacy of the state (and of course them as the elites) that can direct resources better than the people.
    They have no theory of costs – the wealth extinguished by taxation is lost on them because it’s just rich people who have too much.
    They extract productivity in transactions of decline by increasing taxes, which actually results in less productivity and tax revenue, for which they blame capitalism, then double down on statism up to and until not only prosperity, but liberty, is extinguished permanently.
    All the while the self-appointed elitists of statism insulate themselves from the effects of their malignant ideology.
    Progressivism is the most retrograde ideology ever because it masquerades as anything but socialism.
    It, like communism, ends in the same place, stagnation caused by the party and the state being the same thing.
    These elites quickly lose touch with the people so have call them bigots, deplorable and irredeemables to rationalize their irrational and fatal conceits, that somehow people who have never been in business can direct businesses, that people that have never had children can direct parents, and that people who are insulated from the struggles of the people can identify their needs.
    All the while the bleat on they’re “investing” in people. Now that’s the middle class since the poor have been ditched.
    Sure, investing others’ money, but keeping risk in their hands, and the statists only interested in the gains, not the losses.
    They are all the same; they just operate at different intensities and circumstances. The one party state is always the result.