I have no interest in defending Disney from Schutzstaffel Justice… nothing to gain at all. I have nothing to gain frim defending public scools from their own monsters…
Nobody NEEDS Disney.
The story of Sleeping Beauty predates Disney. After all, Tchaikovsky wrote a ballet on that theme. Will that be banned as well?
I already know how this woman’s children will turn out … too bad she doesn’t see the mental basket cases she’s turning her own two children into …
Psycho-busybody social warrior Mom. Her children will become Al Franken and Harvey Weinstein desperately groping women, because their own mother frightened them to NEVER touch the opposite sex, without a Doctors note and legal contract.
Some time in the 60’s sexual restraint was abandoned. Remember all that “free” love? The rules regarding sexual interactions became confusing. It is a little late in the game, but now women are panicking. Ray Moore makes passes to see if any of these women are interested in having sex with him. We assume they were not, and he backs off, but 40 years later they decide to complain. I blame women for much of the confusion. Free love left them with some huge problems, including single parenthood and abortion. I believe some would like to return to an era of simpler sexual interaction where there were rules and guidelines and personal responsibility … Too late. Of course lots of people did not follow the rules previously, but that was a matter of personal choice. At least everyone understood the rules. Now we have nutbars attacking sleeping beauty.
She wants to “have a conversation”. Leftist idiots (ie. Don Iveson) always claim to want a “conversation” but in reality they just want that conversation to end with people agreeing with their horrible ideas.
This is one mother who made a complaint to her son’s school near Newcastle, England.
How does she send twitter messages to her friends and then gets covered in newspapers around the world. This is not a legitimate conversation for the world to be having. Every crackpot is now getting attention they don’t deserve.
Wait till it comes to a school in your own community.
FFS
Who in the hell is teaching them to think this way? Angry lesbian feminists I’ll warrant.
Here’s the kicker. In the original “Sleeping Beauty,” by Perrault, the princess is not awakened by a kiss. That bit was added by Disney, although it is in a similar story from the Brothers Grimm. Fit the simple-minded sexual romanticism of the Fifties. In the original version, the prince falls on his knees in awe, and Sleeping Beauty wakes up simply because the curse has run its hundred-year course.
There is an older Italian story that is similar. In it, the prince rapes the sleeping princess. And he is the villain of the piece.
Mom here might have a point. Our current Sleeping Beauty may be tainted by the sexual license that began in the Fifties.
everyone has gone batshit crazy.
Sleeping Beauty should be banned because it contributes to the young girl princess complex that we are suffering through today. Young girls all think they are princesses and that the sun shines out their arse and they should be worshiped just for existing.
“Mother should be banned from primary schools. Her out-of-control busybodiness should be kept as far away from our children as possible.
– For The Children…”
The left ruins everything. It’s what they do.
Honestly, frack off. I will stick with innocent until proven guilty. Since you, obviously, equate accusation with guilt, I will remember to apply that same standard to you, that you are applying to Moore. Remember, LindaL is guilty, any accusation anyone wants to make. At any time. At any place. No evidence required. Just the accusation.
As for Roy Moore, if videos or recordings come to light to back up the Rolling Stone rape accusation, then there is something to talk about. Until they crap though, they need to get off the pot. I will defend Roy Moore for as long, and with as much vigor, as Bill Clinton has been defended. Moore should just start quoting Clinton at every presser where they ask him anything; “it depends on what the meaning of the word is is”. He should also get their names wrong on purpose; “I have never met Juanita Brodderick, I do not know why she is accusing me”. Or maybe.. “I don’t know who mattress girl is”.
Denying doesn’t work. Apologizing doesn’t work. Evidence or lack of it does not work. Moore needs to go full Trump, because going Trump works; as evidenced by the man occupying the white house. Maybe it is time for Roy Moore to pull out a Clinton brand cigar when they ask him about any of these women.
I REMEMBER NOW! LindaL robbed a train! June 2, 1899 in the vicinity of Wilcox, Wyoming, I remember I saw LindaL robbing that train! Accusation means guilt, so clearly, by LindaL’s own standards, she is as guilty as Roy Moore.
Why do I think that that mommy just recently changed brands of tinfoil for hat making
A generation ago, the feminists objected to fairy tales because the female protagonists would get married and live happily ever after. Those marriage endings only perpetuated the patriarchy. Since they can no longer object to marriage because everybody is entitled to marry anybody or anything, they need a new indignation hence “rape culture”.
Agree 100%!!
And trying to connect a note in a yearbook with sexual aggression…am I missing part of that story??
my butt are we a precious snowflake who gits butthurt because someone thinks that maybe, just maybe, a thumper did actually try to date, and more, a 14 year old. So heads up fool, girls as young as 10 are sometimes “curious” in a sexual manner. And most 14 year olds are definitely curious, and quite often aggressively so, in a sexual manner. The USA are sexually up tight twits as to sex. Manny countries have the age of consent set at 14, as did Canada, until a bunch of bible bangers got all bent out of shape.
I agree with lindal as to what as to context. I had 14 year old approach me for a ride in my new truck, WHEN I WAS 45. And “trucking” was not on their mind, and tho they were legal at the time, stupidity was not on my mind,
Now go grow up FOOL!!
Here’s the thing: she’s not wrong. Also, Beauty and the Beast is about Stockholm Syndrome, and Anna is the true villain of Frozen.
News flash: most of these fairy tales date from the 17th to 19th centuries and reflect the mores and values of their time, and they have already been altered to suit the mores and values of ours. Getting your knickers in a twist because somebody has pointed out that the mores and values of the 1930s are no longer salient in 2017 is being just as petty as this busybody tiger mom.
The Left Eating the Left, I’ll just sit back and enjoy the lunany!
I suppose that some SJW feminist nutter will object to it being–wait for it!–a prince who wakes up Sleeping Beauty. Why not a barrista or a blue-collar deplorable? How about Prince? A princess, maybe? Nah–it should be a xim who thinks xe’s a xer, someone on the Baskin-Robbins list of mix-and-match genders, or have I got that switched around?
It reminds me of this fable by Aesop: http://www.bartleby.com/17/1/62.html
@Kate:
Oh gee, I got a hat tip. Never expected that. Wow, the first time. Do I get money for that? (just kidding, I need a funny cat video for that)
Seriously though, I was tickled pink.
I will try not to let it go to my head.
…which of course raises an important question: How is it that Disney is able to get away with re-copyrighting works that were already in the public domain?
I think you misunderstood my point. My point was that EVEN if the stories are true, Moore did not do anything so out if line. We have become very confused about appropriate sexual behavior. I used Moore as only one example of this confusion.
How is it that Disney is able to get away with re-copyrighting works that were already in the public domain?
Corporatism. Disney buys politicians and gets copyright laws extended everytime Mickey Mouse is set to go into the public domain. Of course ‘ole Mickey get retroactively pulled into the new law.
Disney corporation buying new laws from the government to benefit itself. That’s how they stay out of public domain.
“Nah–it should be a xim who thinks xe’s a xer, someone on the Baskin-Robbins list of mix-and-match genders, or have I got that switched around?”
That my friend is about the size of it. Conform or get tracked in front of self incriminating Vishinky HRC.
In the same situation as the Prince in “The Sleeping Beauty”,I’d have called my old buddy Prince Charles,no relation to the current Prince Charles,and had him do the kissing the snoring broad bit.
As a necrophiliac I’m sure he’d have been thrilled,and would then owe me a big favor.
I’ve always wondered,in those 100 years,did her natural bodily functions shut down or………..?
The world is chock full of angry,frustrated little people who are absolutely powerless in the scheme of things,so they feign outrage at the most mundane things, so they can feel their 15 minutes of raw POWER.
In different times they’d have been executioners for the Inquisition,witch hunters, Lubyanka interrogators,or oven masters for the Reich,now all they can do is find silly “causes” to plague us with.
If God really IS watching over us all,one of these days he’s going to have had enough,and the entire planet will be pixie dust. And I can’t say I blame Him.
Oh, definitely!
Russian, you know.
.
Sometimes a kiss is an expression of love, and not sexual agression.
That is an important distinction .. perhaps too subtle for the leftist.
To the leftist … kissing a mirror is love.
.
I heard that god is tied up dealing with a particularly harsh sector of the galaxy. He’s not only in charge of earth you know. He has to go and supervise all those other civilizations aound the universe. He built it, so he owns it eh?
Personally, I think god is a bit of loser these days. I mean just take a look around and tell me if this planet is worthy. It’s a freaking mess. He’s starting to look like the Galactic version of Obama. Everyone hates everyone and we are far too many people to manage on this small blue ball. God has failed us. He is the eternal manager and he’s not evern hanging aound in our sector of the galaxy. I doubt if he even knows that Trump won the election and is currently doing HIS job.
Since god’s been around forever, and we’ve been around for only a few million years … what did he do before he dreamed up this mess. And what’s he going to do when we are gone?
That’s another question I have … if we are ‘fortunate’ when we die we hope to go to heaven, but why? You have to behave, you don’t have your body as far as I can tell so golfing is out. So what are you going to do for the rest of eternity? Not much as I see it …. there might be a better party going on down below where it’s warmer.
Okay, that was fun. I am so bored with these freaks of the left that I am reduced to this sort of humor.
Here’s the kicker. In the original “Sleeping Beauty,” by Perrault, the princess is not awakened by a kiss.
Well, you got one thing right. She wasn’t wakened by a kiss. In many of the versions she wakes up after giving birth.
In the newfangled Victorian version, however, not only do those awful prudes (Isn’t it so wonderfully progressive of us to have abandoned their sexual ethics!) have Prince Charming not doing what your average pagan warlord would do if he came upon a nubile sleeping hottie, they set it up so that the guy knows that the only way to save the gal from living death is to give her a chaste smooch.
In other words: It was mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. Implied consent.
Good Lord. What are they teaching them in these schools.
Here’s the kicker. In the original “Sleeping Beauty,” by Perrault, the princess is not awakened by a kiss.
Well, you got one thing right. She wasn’t wakened by a kiss. In many of the versions she wakes up after giving birth.
In the newfangled Victorian version, however, not only do those awful prudes (Isn’t it so wonderfully progressive of us to have abandoned their sexual ethics!) have Prince Charming not doing what your average pagan warlord would do if he came upon a nubile sleeping hottie, they set it up so that the guy knows that the only way to save the gal from living death is to give her a chaste smooch.
In other words: It was mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. Implied consent.
Good Lord. What are they teaching them in these schools.
I have no interest in defending Disney from Schutzstaffel Justice… nothing to gain at all. I have nothing to gain frim defending public scools from their own monsters…
Nobody NEEDS Disney.
The story of Sleeping Beauty predates Disney. After all, Tchaikovsky wrote a ballet on that theme. Will that be banned as well?
I already know how this woman’s children will turn out … too bad she doesn’t see the mental basket cases she’s turning her own two children into …
Psycho-busybody social warrior Mom. Her children will become Al Franken and Harvey Weinstein desperately groping women, because their own mother frightened them to NEVER touch the opposite sex, without a Doctors note and legal contract.
Some time in the 60’s sexual restraint was abandoned. Remember all that “free” love? The rules regarding sexual interactions became confusing. It is a little late in the game, but now women are panicking. Ray Moore makes passes to see if any of these women are interested in having sex with him. We assume they were not, and he backs off, but 40 years later they decide to complain. I blame women for much of the confusion. Free love left them with some huge problems, including single parenthood and abortion. I believe some would like to return to an era of simpler sexual interaction where there were rules and guidelines and personal responsibility … Too late. Of course lots of people did not follow the rules previously, but that was a matter of personal choice. At least everyone understood the rules. Now we have nutbars attacking sleeping beauty.
She wants to “have a conversation”. Leftist idiots (ie. Don Iveson) always claim to want a “conversation” but in reality they just want that conversation to end with people agreeing with their horrible ideas.
This is one mother who made a complaint to her son’s school near Newcastle, England.
How does she send twitter messages to her friends and then gets covered in newspapers around the world. This is not a legitimate conversation for the world to be having. Every crackpot is now getting attention they don’t deserve.
Wait till it comes to a school in your own community.
FFS
Who in the hell is teaching them to think this way? Angry lesbian feminists I’ll warrant.
Here’s the kicker. In the original “Sleeping Beauty,” by Perrault, the princess is not awakened by a kiss. That bit was added by Disney, although it is in a similar story from the Brothers Grimm. Fit the simple-minded sexual romanticism of the Fifties. In the original version, the prince falls on his knees in awe, and Sleeping Beauty wakes up simply because the curse has run its hundred-year course.
There is an older Italian story that is similar. In it, the prince rapes the sleeping princess. And he is the villain of the piece.
Mom here might have a point. Our current Sleeping Beauty may be tainted by the sexual license that began in the Fifties.
everyone has gone batshit crazy.
Sleeping Beauty should be banned because it contributes to the young girl princess complex that we are suffering through today. Young girls all think they are princesses and that the sun shines out their arse and they should be worshiped just for existing.
“Mother should be banned from primary schools. Her out-of-control busybodiness should be kept as far away from our children as possible.
– For The Children…”
The left ruins everything. It’s what they do.
Honestly, frack off. I will stick with innocent until proven guilty. Since you, obviously, equate accusation with guilt, I will remember to apply that same standard to you, that you are applying to Moore. Remember, LindaL is guilty, any accusation anyone wants to make. At any time. At any place. No evidence required. Just the accusation.
As for Roy Moore, if videos or recordings come to light to back up the Rolling Stone rape accusation, then there is something to talk about. Until they crap though, they need to get off the pot. I will defend Roy Moore for as long, and with as much vigor, as Bill Clinton has been defended. Moore should just start quoting Clinton at every presser where they ask him anything; “it depends on what the meaning of the word is is”. He should also get their names wrong on purpose; “I have never met Juanita Brodderick, I do not know why she is accusing me”. Or maybe.. “I don’t know who mattress girl is”.
Denying doesn’t work. Apologizing doesn’t work. Evidence or lack of it does not work. Moore needs to go full Trump, because going Trump works; as evidenced by the man occupying the white house. Maybe it is time for Roy Moore to pull out a Clinton brand cigar when they ask him about any of these women.
I REMEMBER NOW! LindaL robbed a train! June 2, 1899 in the vicinity of Wilcox, Wyoming, I remember I saw LindaL robbing that train! Accusation means guilt, so clearly, by LindaL’s own standards, she is as guilty as Roy Moore.
Why do I think that that mommy just recently changed brands of tinfoil for hat making
A generation ago, the feminists objected to fairy tales because the female protagonists would get married and live happily ever after. Those marriage endings only perpetuated the patriarchy. Since they can no longer object to marriage because everybody is entitled to marry anybody or anything, they need a new indignation hence “rape culture”.
Agree 100%!!
And trying to connect a note in a yearbook with sexual aggression…am I missing part of that story??
my butt are we a precious snowflake who gits butthurt because someone thinks that maybe, just maybe, a thumper did actually try to date, and more, a 14 year old. So heads up fool, girls as young as 10 are sometimes “curious” in a sexual manner. And most 14 year olds are definitely curious, and quite often aggressively so, in a sexual manner. The USA are sexually up tight twits as to sex. Manny countries have the age of consent set at 14, as did Canada, until a bunch of bible bangers got all bent out of shape.
I agree with lindal as to what as to context. I had 14 year old approach me for a ride in my new truck, WHEN I WAS 45. And “trucking” was not on their mind, and tho they were legal at the time, stupidity was not on my mind,
Now go grow up FOOL!!
Here’s the thing: she’s not wrong. Also, Beauty and the Beast is about Stockholm Syndrome, and Anna is the true villain of Frozen.
News flash: most of these fairy tales date from the 17th to 19th centuries and reflect the mores and values of their time, and they have already been altered to suit the mores and values of ours. Getting your knickers in a twist because somebody has pointed out that the mores and values of the 1930s are no longer salient in 2017 is being just as petty as this busybody tiger mom.
The Left Eating the Left, I’ll just sit back and enjoy the lunany!
I suppose that some SJW feminist nutter will object to it being–wait for it!–a prince who wakes up Sleeping Beauty. Why not a barrista or a blue-collar deplorable? How about Prince? A princess, maybe? Nah–it should be a xim who thinks xe’s a xer, someone on the Baskin-Robbins list of mix-and-match genders, or have I got that switched around?
It reminds me of this fable by Aesop:
http://www.bartleby.com/17/1/62.html
@Kate:
Oh gee, I got a hat tip. Never expected that. Wow, the first time. Do I get money for that? (just kidding, I need a funny cat video for that)
Seriously though, I was tickled pink.
I will try not to let it go to my head.
…which of course raises an important question: How is it that Disney is able to get away with re-copyrighting works that were already in the public domain?
I think you misunderstood my point. My point was that EVEN if the stories are true, Moore did not do anything so out if line. We have become very confused about appropriate sexual behavior. I used Moore as only one example of this confusion.
We need a famine? Looks like we’re about to get one, over the next 10-15 years.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/agriculture/the-approaching-famine/
How is it that Disney is able to get away with re-copyrighting works that were already in the public domain?
Corporatism. Disney buys politicians and gets copyright laws extended everytime Mickey Mouse is set to go into the public domain. Of course ‘ole Mickey get retroactively pulled into the new law.
Disney corporation buying new laws from the government to benefit itself. That’s how they stay out of public domain.
“Nah–it should be a xim who thinks xe’s a xer, someone on the Baskin-Robbins list of mix-and-match genders, or have I got that switched around?”
That my friend is about the size of it. Conform or get tracked in front of self incriminating Vishinky HRC.
In the same situation as the Prince in “The Sleeping Beauty”,I’d have called my old buddy Prince Charles,no relation to the current Prince Charles,and had him do the kissing the snoring broad bit.
As a necrophiliac I’m sure he’d have been thrilled,and would then owe me a big favor.
I’ve always wondered,in those 100 years,did her natural bodily functions shut down or………..?
The world is chock full of angry,frustrated little people who are absolutely powerless in the scheme of things,so they feign outrage at the most mundane things, so they can feel their 15 minutes of raw POWER.
In different times they’d have been executioners for the Inquisition,witch hunters, Lubyanka interrogators,or oven masters for the Reich,now all they can do is find silly “causes” to plague us with.
If God really IS watching over us all,one of these days he’s going to have had enough,and the entire planet will be pixie dust. And I can’t say I blame Him.
Oh, definitely!
Russian, you know.
.
Sometimes a kiss is an expression of love, and not sexual agression.
That is an important distinction .. perhaps too subtle for the leftist.
To the leftist … kissing a mirror is love.
.
I heard that god is tied up dealing with a particularly harsh sector of the galaxy. He’s not only in charge of earth you know. He has to go and supervise all those other civilizations aound the universe. He built it, so he owns it eh?
Personally, I think god is a bit of loser these days. I mean just take a look around and tell me if this planet is worthy. It’s a freaking mess. He’s starting to look like the Galactic version of Obama. Everyone hates everyone and we are far too many people to manage on this small blue ball. God has failed us. He is the eternal manager and he’s not evern hanging aound in our sector of the galaxy. I doubt if he even knows that Trump won the election and is currently doing HIS job.
Since god’s been around forever, and we’ve been around for only a few million years … what did he do before he dreamed up this mess. And what’s he going to do when we are gone?
That’s another question I have … if we are ‘fortunate’ when we die we hope to go to heaven, but why? You have to behave, you don’t have your body as far as I can tell so golfing is out. So what are you going to do for the rest of eternity? Not much as I see it …. there might be a better party going on down below where it’s warmer.
Okay, that was fun. I am so bored with these freaks of the left that I am reduced to this sort of humor.
Here’s the kicker. In the original “Sleeping Beauty,” by Perrault, the princess is not awakened by a kiss.
Well, you got one thing right. She wasn’t wakened by a kiss. In many of the versions she wakes up after giving birth.
In the newfangled Victorian version, however, not only do those awful prudes (Isn’t it so wonderfully progressive of us to have abandoned their sexual ethics!) have Prince Charming not doing what your average pagan warlord would do if he came upon a nubile sleeping hottie, they set it up so that the guy knows that the only way to save the gal from living death is to give her a chaste smooch.
In other words: It was mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. Implied consent.
Good Lord. What are they teaching them in these schools.
Here’s the kicker. In the original “Sleeping Beauty,” by Perrault, the princess is not awakened by a kiss.
Well, you got one thing right. She wasn’t wakened by a kiss. In many of the versions she wakes up after giving birth.
In the newfangled Victorian version, however, not only do those awful prudes (Isn’t it so wonderfully progressive of us to have abandoned their sexual ethics!) have Prince Charming not doing what your average pagan warlord would do if he came upon a nubile sleeping hottie, they set it up so that the guy knows that the only way to save the gal from living death is to give her a chaste smooch.
In other words: It was mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. Implied consent.
Good Lord. What are they teaching them in these schools.