FBI Documents Raise Questions about TWA Flight 800 Crash
21 Replies to “TWA 800, 30 Years Later”
Wow!!! It must be “Burton Sunday” …just finished watching a documentary on TWA Flight 800 the other night. Very well done…details the tensions that existed between the FBI and the NTSB immediately after they started bringing wreckage back to Virginia . Tampering with the evidence at night…threatening witnesses ( hundreds saw a launched missile)…threatening NTSB investigators, the FBI did it all.
I’ve said it before…the FBI are simply incapable of telling the truth.
Must see folks!!!!
I’ll listen to this one tonight.
The official story always reeked to high heaven. Yet another black eye for the demonic, Deep State communists that run the FBI. Trump should reopen the investigation and bring these mendacious liars to justice.
Yes, the official coverup story was that there was a spark from exposed wires inside a nearly empty fuel tank. The plane has just taken off, to fly across the Atlantic, with an empty fuel tank? And there are live wires (at voltages high enough to create a spark) running through fuel tanks? That explanation reeks, indeed.
soooooooooooo basically the MESSage is we dare not trust the FIB, er, (oops !!) eef bee eye one miniscule IOTA, going aaaaaall the way back to BUG eye hoover planting moles in 60s protest groups, opening a dossier on ANYBODY in the entire nation above dogcatcher (for future reference, ask MLK about that), all the way up to the ‘russiagate’ conspiracy with them in up to the EYE (there it is again) balls.
ah, BUT lm the ‘bad guy’ gloating and celebrating when cops are shot to death?
Even the CIA couldn’t resist the urge to stick their snout in the investigation telling witnesses repeatedly, via a film they produced, that what they saw “wasn’t a missle”. Hmmm…that right there makes people even more suspicious.
Yes, Mole, who are you going to believe? Your own career experience, or some rando with a YouTube account?
Personally, I believe Graham Hancock downed that plane to divert attention from my totally true and not at all made up theory that the inhabitants of Doggerland had an advanced, fusion-powered civilization during the early Holocene.
Am watching the video and am about halfway through it, so maybe this is answered. Wasn’t there a Navy training exercise going on in the area at the time? I remember at the time hearing that Navy vessels from the exercise were the first vessels on the crash site.
Mayday did an excellent episode on this crash, detailing the interference by the CIA and FBI and their absurdly premature conclusions that it was a terrorist act.
The NTSB, the experts, found no evidence of a bomb. They analyzed the fuel tanks and found wiring issues that could have caused the explosion. Early 747s were found to have similar wiring defects and harnesses were replaced.
A terrorist attack would have made cowardly Bill Clinton, who was at the tail end of a reelection campaign, look bad, especially if his administration didn’t respond in a firm and meaningful way.
So, that explanation was scuttled.
This was the period when the FBI was responsible for the Ruby Ridge and Waco tragedies.
Wow!!! It must be “Burton Sunday” …just finished watching a documentary on TWA Flight 800 the other night. Very well done…details the tensions that existed between the FBI and the NTSB immediately after they started bringing wreckage back to Virginia . Tampering with the evidence at night…threatening witnesses ( hundreds saw a launched missile)…threatening NTSB investigators, the FBI did it all.
I’ve said it before…the FBI are simply incapable of telling the truth.
Must see folks!!!!
I’ll listen to this one tonight.
The official story always reeked to high heaven. Yet another black eye for the demonic, Deep State communists that run the FBI. Trump should reopen the investigation and bring these mendacious liars to justice.
Yes, the official coverup story was that there was a spark from exposed wires inside a nearly empty fuel tank. The plane has just taken off, to fly across the Atlantic, with an empty fuel tank? And there are live wires (at voltages high enough to create a spark) running through fuel tanks? That explanation reeks, indeed.
Iran?
soooooooooooo basically the MESSage is we dare not trust the FIB, er, (oops !!) eef bee eye one miniscule IOTA, going aaaaaall the way back to BUG eye hoover planting moles in 60s protest groups, opening a dossier on ANYBODY in the entire nation above dogcatcher (for future reference, ask MLK about that), all the way up to the ‘russiagate’ conspiracy with them in up to the EYE (there it is again) balls.
ah, BUT lm the ‘bad guy’ gloating and celebrating when cops are shot to death?
Even the CIA couldn’t resist the urge to stick their snout in the investigation telling witnesses repeatedly, via a film they produced, that what they saw “wasn’t a missle”. Hmmm…that right there makes people even more suspicious.
I work in Avation mtx, i know some senior mechanics who did the fuel tank mods after TWA 800, the wiring was definately a problem.
Maybe watch the video.
Yes, Mole, who are you going to believe? Your own career experience, or some rando with a YouTube account?
Personally, I believe Graham Hancock downed that plane to divert attention from my totally true and not at all made up theory that the inhabitants of Doggerland had an advanced, fusion-powered civilization during the early Holocene.
Theatrical sets reached a new level of excellence in the early Hollow Scene Era.
On that day I was in Southhampton NY and knew instantly the FBI was lying. They were covering up everything.
Who on the plane had something on the Clintons?
Am watching the video and am about halfway through it, so maybe this is answered. Wasn’t there a Navy training exercise going on in the area at the time? I remember at the time hearing that Navy vessels from the exercise were the first vessels on the crash site.
Yes, there was a training exercise and at the time speculation was that one of the ships fired a missile that hit TWA 800.
I don’t remember what the conjecture was as to why the missile was launched.
Mayday did an excellent episode on this crash, detailing the interference by the CIA and FBI and their absurdly premature conclusions that it was a terrorist act.
The NTSB, the experts, found no evidence of a bomb. They analyzed the fuel tanks and found wiring issues that could have caused the explosion. Early 747s were found to have similar wiring defects and harnesses were replaced.
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1997/jul/02/bad-wiring-plagues-747s-study-finds-twa-crash/
It was replaced on more than just 747’s
Econo, re the NTSB, we live in an age where you can’t trust any government agency no matter how professional and proficient.
This happened 30 years ago and the NTSB was at odds with the CIA and FBI. So one can’t trust any of them, though all had a different explanation.
Do we trust the FBI, CIA, or the NTSB when it comes to the causes of plane crashes? I’ll go with the experts.
The explanation that usually “wins” is the one the politicos and/or the Deep State wants.
The FBI and CIA were pushing a terrorist attack.
I guess they lost!
You don’t know what you’re talking about!
A terrorist attack would have made cowardly Bill Clinton, who was at the tail end of a reelection campaign, look bad, especially if his administration didn’t respond in a firm and meaningful way.
So, that explanation was scuttled.
This was the period when the FBI was responsible for the Ruby Ridge and Waco tragedies.