Now we’re down to this.

Having had no luck fishing for any direct evidence of Trump, the Trump family, the campaign team, anyone in Congress, the second cousin thrice removed or anyone else who met Trump in the last ten years having colluded with the Russians, the Salem elders are now looking at “pro-Trump” websites.
I hear water-float tests are next.

21 Replies to “Now we’re down to this.”

  1. Awesome! Does that mean we will soon see a full-blown Congressional investigation into the collusion and direct funding of pro-Hillary, pro-Anarchy websites by George Soros. I think those connections will be much easier to PROVE.

  2. At this point I want this to continue. Only the insane leftists are still on board here. The low information voters have noticed how unhinged the democrats are at this point. I mean Maxine Waters is their standard bearer! The woman wanted to impeach Trump on day 1 because he was elected.

  3. Seven months unable to find Russian links; two days to dox a critic.
    Piper Lexington captcha!

  4. They already did a study about fake news and found that the effects on the election results were negligible.
    http://news.stanford.edu/2017/01/18/stanford-study-examines-fake-news-2016-presidential-election/
    “For fake news to have changed the outcome of the election, a single fake news story would need to have convinced about 0.7 percent of Clinton voters and non-voters who saw it to shift their votes to Trump, a persuasion rate equivalent to seeing 36 television campaign ads,” the authors conclude.

  5. Well, the enemy is the uniparty of omnipotent moral busy bodies. They are killing us for our own good, do so with the approval of their consciences, and it will never stop. I would laugh at the people who think there is any way, other than a shooting war and genocide of SJWs to resolve this, if they didn’t piss me off with their crap so badly.
    Public education has to be ended, and never allowed to start again.

  6. a witch hunt, which witch would that bee, Hillery witch which would be easy to find, just ask the Russians were that witch is!

  7. Come now folks. Trump had a Vodka and clam in 2012. The denotes collusion with the Russians.

  8. Ha! … and he serves *gasp* … Russian caviar … at his golf course Restaurants …

  9. The point Dear Comrades is that who votes and how does not matter. What matters is who hacks the elections and how.

  10. Almost surprisingly, only you got lance’s reference to the float test. You must be a witch.

  11. ok I admit it.
    Every time I say I don’t like liberals or that I like Trump, Russia gives me a ruble.
    da da da chicken à la Kiev

  12. Kiev is in Ukraine.(so far its still the capital)
    But since Russia doesn’t have it’s own cuisine or any culture that anyone else likes, the mistake is understandable.

  13. I have a confession,
    I did consort with Russian Agents in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. Every Saturday morning I rendezvoused with them after breakfast and watched their very active spying and sabotage operations in my own state of Minnesota, and the US. I was so familiar with these Russian agents, I even knew their names, and even the name of their control.
    Please, Please Forgive Me!
    I thought that their missions were a very humorous, but bumbling attempt to subvert the United States of America, and thought they were relatively harmless, and often times quite funny. Little did I know that my familiarity with Boris Badenov and Natasha Fatale would lead me to be an unthinking stooge of Vladimir Putin and vote for Donald J. Trump in November 2016. I guess Fearless Leader was able to subvert me and create an unknowing Russian Sleeper Agent. I thought my cheering for the intrepid Minnesotans Bullwinkle Moose and Rocket J. Squirrel from Frostbite Falls when they defeated the Russians made me a loyal American.
    The Democrats have convinced me. I was wrong. My vote for Donald Trump was actually a vote for Vladimir Putin.
    Please forgive me.

  14. A Red under every Bed.
    How rediculus have the dementocrats become, unable to accept reality.

  15. The woods are lovely, dark and deep, but I have promises to keep, and miles to go before I sleep.

  16. I suppose there might be something useful to come out of all this, if the question were to be asked, “how much fake news is actually fake?”
    So far I’m gathering that corruption at the Clinton Foundation, widespread pedophilia in high places, Hillary’s poor health, and distrust of climate change, are “fake news.” Oh really? What else, the climate of censorship at universities, big New York money interfering in politics … the list of not so fake news could get pretty long so bring it on, let’s go case by case and study the influence of this “fake news” — and if Putin is behind some of it, good for him.

  17. re fake news.
    from the july 1-7 2017 Economist science and technology pg 70:
    https://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21724370-generating-convincing-audio-and-video-fake-events-fake-news-you-aint-seen
    ‘it is becoming easier to create convincing audio and video of things that have never happened’.
    I used to warn people this was coming in the court system where a mob defense attorney would produce a video of their client attending some function or location 100s of miles from the ‘scene of the crime’. (it may still). I didn’t know it was going to be news media getting first kick at the can. well it’s here and going to get worse.
    sign of the times, sign of the times . . . .

Navigation