36 Replies to “Around The World In 80 Body Parts”

  1. And, again, another radicalized Englishman: Adrian Elms, born in Kent on Christmas Day in 1964, to a 17-year-old single mother.
    You can’t make this kind of thing up.

  2. let me play the liberal;
    It is not so bad. it shows muslim terrorists are not racists, they treat everyone as equal, they will kill a French, Romanian, Korean, German, Polish, Irish, Chinese, US, Italian, Greek (and even a Canadian had one been there.)
    all infidels of any race are good to be murdered. muslim terrorists do not discriminate by race! ain’t that great?
    don’t you see multiculturalism is working just fine?
    now let’s import millions of those muslims here ! and let’s all go dance to punjabi music in our muslim clothes with Mohamed Trudeau !!!
    we will teach you the cool new dance move : motion 103!!!
    as a door prize everyone gets a lapidation stone you can take home!

  3. There were some Brits too. You know, we actually live here and have done all our lives.

  4. “And, again, another radicalized Englishman”
    Are you talking about Adrian Elms or George Eaton?
    I’m wondering which one causes the most damage to English culture?

  5. The MSM wants you to know the assailant was British born, but not that he was a member of
    the religion of piecers.

  6. So who all is radicalized?
    Is accepting terrorism in the name of multiculturalism and defending rape by muslims a bit radical?
    Looks like 90% of the media and 99% of liberals have been radicalized to accept these attacks on them.
    Or is the idea of defending and protecting ourselves the radical idea these days?

  7. With the Liberals getting their anti Islamophobia bill passed in the HOC should we even be talking about the London terrorist attack by a practitioner of “radical” Islam?

  8. Pierre Trudeau’s idea of Multiculturalism has the potential to take us down as a unified, cohesive society.
    That coupled with his Charter is a mix for disaster for national unity.

  9. Did they recycle the teddy bears and plastic flowers from the last vigil?
    It is very important to recycle…

  10. I don’t understand the purpose of this attack. Was the attacker or his motivators interested in causing terror among tourists, so less people come to London, or among British workers, so they won’t commute to work in this area, or among the whole British nation, so they will … what? Usually when some crime is committed, police try to figure out the motivation of the criminal, for example to predict the next crime in a series. So what is the goal of this guy or the support group he belonged to?
    Some news stuff said he was radicalized internally to Britain, so it should be easy to find out where and how, and figure out the whole point of this. I can’t come up with any guesses.

  11. Oh, well. As long as this “lone wolf” (who was addicted to drugs and therefore bears no responsibility) wasn’t a racist.
    Now, let’s stop talking about this before Iqra Khalid starts crying again. You know how tender she is.

  12. See !? Londoners are completely SAFE from (unnamed) Terrorists ! The Mayor of London is right ! “Carry on”. “Nothing to see here”, “Stop being an Islamophobe” !!!

  13. Yes, but I doubt George Eaton would even considering celebrating you – more likely to consider you the British equivalent of a “deplorable”.

  14. Wait, no “Asians” were injured?
    How can that happen, since there are so many in London?
    Funny that. Almost like there was a warning in that community, from an Iman maybe?
    Maybe the Mayor of London, Sadiq”Taqiyya” Khan can tell us. /sarc off
    (Yes, I love conspiracy theories….)

  15. M-103 was a Motion, not a Bill. Spreading misinformation doesn’t help our cause and only destroys credibility. Read the parable about “The Boy Who Cried Wolf” for clarification.

  16. The LSM keeps flogging the “he acted alone; there is no threat” bullshít. With London’s 12% muslime population and ISIS claiming him as one of their own, it’s patently ridiculous to believe that this terrorist didn’t have muslime community support and that there aren’t more ready to take his place. We never hear muslimes denouncing islamic terrorism do we?

  17. Well, I think we all know M-103,and we should M-103,because that is the only way M-103 we can change M-103!

  18. French, Romanian, Korean, German, Polish, Irish, Chinese, US, Italian, Greek. And what do they have in common?
    A: They are victims of mooselimbs.

  19. I’ll go with both.
    The killer also used his stepfather’s name for a period of his life which is why you see Ajao.
    When was he radicalized? Was it when he was first in prison? Why was he involved with the radical Muslims (am I allowed to say that?) in Birmingham. (And wasn’t Trump right-on about Birmingham?)
    Some of the commenters on the Daily News don’t want to hear anymore about him, but I am the opposite. I want to know everything about him: where he was, to whom was he speaking, what group became his mentors, everything. If they’re becoming radicalized in prison (and we all know it is happening there), why don’t they have a prison for Muzzies only? The administration and staff should be non-Muslims. And no imams, or prayer rooms.
    (I’d say deport them back to their home countries but they can get back in far too easily.)
    The U.K. – everyone – has to get very serious about this thing.
    (with malice towards none.)

  20. I’ll go with both.
    The killer also used his stepfather’s name for a period of his life which is why you see Ajao.
    He was first described by someone as an Asian, who could have just said non-white.
    When was he radicalized? Was it when he was first in prison? Why was he involved with the radical Muslims (am I allowed to say that?) in Birmingham. (And wasn’t Trump right-on about Birmingham?)
    Some of the commenters on the Daily News don’t want to hear anymore about him, but I am the opposite. I want to know everything about him: where he was, to whom was he speaking, what group became his mentors, everything. If they’re becoming radicalized in prison (and we all know it is happening there), why don’t they have a prison for Muzzies only? The administration and staff should be non-Muslims. And no imams, or prayer rooms.
    (I’d say deport them back to their home countries but they can get back in far too easily.)
    The U.K. – everyone – has to get very serious about this thing. Not us, but the rest of the western freedom-loving countries.

  21. John Galt >
    “The Boy Who Cried Wolf”
    This “motion” is a stepping stone, anyone with a brain understands that, or they wouldn’t have bothered in the first place.
    Canada already has hate speech laws covered, this new “motion” is singularly directed at elevating Islam in Canadian law to a “special status” as it lists it by name while lumping all others together. Yes Motions more readily become Bills in the future than otherwise.
    Liz J >
    Thanks for speaking up Liz J,
    One of the very few that seem care enough to speak up about being walked over and marginalized by your own government for the benefit of a unwarranted few.

  22. Of course it’s an ATTEMPT at a ‘stepping stone’, wasn’t that obvious?
    It should also be obvious from the public backlash to the motion that further attempts to morph it into an ‘anti-islamophobia’ law will be met with strong opposition, and will likely cause them to loose the next election. Any attempt to turn it into law will happen in the year before the next election, and it WILL be the defining issue that defeats the Lieberals. Whoever becomes the CPC leader will use this as a rallying point. We haven’t heard the end of this by a long shot.

  23. “The Mayor of London is right ! ‘Carry on’.”
    As one who was just getting off the Tube at Embankment Station when the attacks of 7 July 2005 occurred, I can tell you that “carry on” is exactly right.
    Millions of Londoners had no choice but to get back on the Underground the next day and carry on. And so we did.

  24. Exactly!! Not all muslimes are terrorists, but almost all terrorists are muslimes.

Navigation