“I’m independent!…But create for me an entire and unnecessary life long make-work government career so I don’t have to suffer the realities of the free market, competition, rigor, and real work. And if you don’t, you’re sexist!”
“I’m independent!…But create for me an entire and unnecessary life long make-work government career so I don’t have to suffer the realities of the free market, competition, rigor, and real work. And if you don’t, you’re sexist!”
Men and women were created differently, and for two purposes. Men, in general, are stronger, faster, and will go to any lengths to pursue their prey. This made them good hunters in the past, and great inventors and leaders today. Women, in general, are more emotional, more giving, and will generally settle for anything that keeps her children safe. Like all generalizations, there are exceptions, and the variance within one sex is so large that there is overlap between the two sexes, so there are women who are stronger, faster, and will go to any lengths compared to many men. That’s not the rule, though.
Because of their innate short-sightedness, women should not have the vote. (Neither should most men, but that’s a different argument.) Women will vote constantly and endlessly for promises of ‘more now’, regardless of whether that means ‘less later’ – take a look at any NDP/Green/Libtard meeting, and compare the male/female ratio with a Conservative meeting.
KevinB, you are most likely a plant, but just in case you aren’t…
Your argument falls apart very quickly. You cannot remotely prove that individual women are more short sighted than men. You cannot remotely prove that as a group women are more short sighted than men. You cannot remotely prove that being short sighted is detrimental to the governance of a nation. Ergo, your argument is without merit. Furthermore, it is inflammatory and brings dishonour to this blog.
Please go peddle your garbage elsewhere.
Eve was made fro adams rib bone not from apes
Perhaps what men need is a Federal Dept. for the Status of Men. You know ? Just to balance the social engineering. The time women needed the Federal government to push their social agendas is long past, by about 30 years. Feminists are constantly indicating that men are no longer needed. Perhaps it’s time to put up or shut up. I expect them to rally on parliament hill and their elected officials. Or give men the same right to enjoy another useless department at the taxpayers expense. In the name of equality of course.
“The Quebec Women’s Federation recently said that the cuts to the state affect women disproportionately, because they make up 75 per cent of personnel in public sector jobs.”
Smith’s response: “This is rich, 75% of women are in these public sector jobs meaning that they are only made up of 25% men. So women are now protesting that their disproportionate share of these jobs getting cuts is sexist but apparently it’s not sexist to have it only be 25% men making up the jobs in personnel.”
Exactly. If womyn choose to take unproductive government jobs which are later axed, they’ve made their bed and they should lie in it.