Policy based evidence making.
Remember with the WMO its imperative the meme lives on, if instrument data contradicts the computer model output(the Gospel), the data must be corrected.
After all this is CAGW, created ,promoted and protected from investigation… by an unholy bureaucracy, made up of the worst of our national bureaucrats.
So the numbers are obviously ..Good enough for government.
And of course only a bureaucrat would come up with retroactive rewriting of past data, on the pretence that men of past generations were just as useless, lazy and corrupt as they are today.
Problem is, it’s not so much “again” as still”.
There is so much in the methodology of climate alarmism which is really tautology. It’s warming. The data don’t show that so adjust them to show warming. Voila, proof that it’s warming. So and so questions CAGW therefore (s)he’s a denier paid by “Big Oil”. How do we know (s)he’s a denier paid by “Big Oil”? Because (s)he questions CAGW. CO2 is the cause of global warming. How do we know that? Because when we assume CO2 is the cause of global warming and we plug it into a computer model, it shows global warming. Tree rings reproduce past global climate trends. How do we know? Because after coring many trees we found one that reproduces what we assumed to be the past global climate trend, therefore tree rings reproduce past global climate trends.
It’s not science; it’s theatre.
And here’s evidence of the Aussie government bureau lying about something that always happens below freezing–frost days–through “homogenization”. http://www.warwickhughes.com/blog/?p=1653
When are some of these folks going to be charged with criminal offences????
It sort of resembles some of the “arguments” I’v heard from kristians regarding the validity of their faith, so I will go with, it’s religion (belief):-)))
Many governments have laws that if someone uses public funds to deliberately publish fraudulent data to mislead the public or government, then they can be found guilty of Fraud. In the US, they can also be found guilty of conspiracy. Normally these pukes are brought up by their professional organizations. HOWEVER, AGW and all its tributaries is a devoutly followed Marxist/progressive religion. Do not ever, ever, expect them to be held accountable for the lies they produce and the damage they cause.
Curse Captcha!
Sad thing is that this really isn’t news anymore as we – the smart ones – know it is happening on a daily basis. Scary is that they keep getting caught yet keep perpetuating the fraud.
Policy based evidence making.
Remember with the WMO its imperative the meme lives on, if instrument data contradicts the computer model output(the Gospel), the data must be corrected.
After all this is CAGW, created ,promoted and protected from investigation… by an unholy bureaucracy, made up of the worst of our national bureaucrats.
So the numbers are obviously ..Good enough for government.
And of course only a bureaucrat would come up with retroactive rewriting of past data, on the pretence that men of past generations were just as useless, lazy and corrupt as they are today.
Problem is, it’s not so much “again” as still”.
There is so much in the methodology of climate alarmism which is really tautology. It’s warming. The data don’t show that so adjust them to show warming. Voila, proof that it’s warming. So and so questions CAGW therefore (s)he’s a denier paid by “Big Oil”. How do we know (s)he’s a denier paid by “Big Oil”? Because (s)he questions CAGW. CO2 is the cause of global warming. How do we know that? Because when we assume CO2 is the cause of global warming and we plug it into a computer model, it shows global warming. Tree rings reproduce past global climate trends. How do we know? Because after coring many trees we found one that reproduces what we assumed to be the past global climate trend, therefore tree rings reproduce past global climate trends.
It’s not science; it’s theatre.
And here’s evidence of the Aussie government bureau lying about something that always happens below freezing–frost days–through “homogenization”.
http://www.warwickhughes.com/blog/?p=1653
When are some of these folks going to be charged with criminal offences????
It sort of resembles some of the “arguments” I’v heard from kristians regarding the validity of their faith, so I will go with, it’s religion (belief):-)))
Many governments have laws that if someone uses public funds to deliberately publish fraudulent data to mislead the public or government, then they can be found guilty of Fraud. In the US, they can also be found guilty of conspiracy. Normally these pukes are brought up by their professional organizations. HOWEVER, AGW and all its tributaries is a devoutly followed Marxist/progressive religion. Do not ever, ever, expect them to be held accountable for the lies they produce and the damage they cause.
Curse Captcha!
Sad thing is that this really isn’t news anymore as we – the smart ones – know it is happening on a daily basis. Scary is that they keep getting caught yet keep perpetuating the fraud.