So, that’s why we stopped hearing about it…
… the scientific underpinnings of shaken baby syndrome have been called into question,” said Denise McWilliams, executive director of the project. “There’s a good amount of evidence that shaken baby syndrome might, at best, be questionable and it might, at worst, be totally bogus.”
Just based on the fact this is the same pedetrician who was the “expert” for Justina I would not find her testimony credible.
“This is a settled scientific fact.”
That quote sends a chill through me.
Here I go again! Hopefully the following millennia generation will reestablish the credibility of the Scientific and Academia communities. Until then we will have to wait for the deadweight Scientists to retire.
Possibly we can establish a best after birth year funding approach. Cheers;
People have gone to prison and had their lives ruined based on Shaken Baby Syndrome convictions.
Yeah well we had a Middlesex (London) ON coroner like that…..last I heard he is employed in Sask.