New solar model predicts imminent global cooling;
As we head to the UNFCCC meeting in Paris 2015 where global bureaucracy beckons, a sharp cooling change appears to be developing and set to hit in the next five years. Yet consortia of five-star politicans are not preparing for climate change, only for global warming. Around the world a billion dollars a day is invested in renewable energy, largely with the hope of changing the weather.
Politicians and environmentalists will not stray from AGW until every red cent is siphoned.
A scientific hypothesis relating to climate that will be tested within 10 years?
They said it couldn’t be done.
Around the world a billion dollars a day is invested in renewable energy, largely with the hope of changing the weather.
Why does King Canute come to mind?
From the link: “Force X turns the tap that controls how much sunlight pours into the Earth’s climate system. This could be through UV, magnetic field effects, solar wind, or some form of electrical field.”
I am somewhat troubled by this vagueness, and the proposal of a “Force X”. I think his proposal would be stronger if he simply said that global temperatures lag TSI by about one solar cycle, for reasons as yet unknown.
Once he has demonstrated the lag relationship between TSI and global temperatures, with a drop in temperature commencing between 2015 and 2024, then it would be appropriate to start searching for a mechanism for the lag.
So the envirofascists killed untold thousands by demanding that malaria continue to kill people when simple pesticides would have looked after the problem, so how many are they going to kill due to the cold? All for their Marxist control ideology.
” the envirofascists killed untold thousands by demanding that malaria continue to kill people… Posted by: Joey”
Let’s see proof for your opinion
Personally I trust climate prediction about as I trust AGW theory. About the only thing about the climate that I am certain of is that the climate will change.
New global warming models indicate that there is too much money in bank accounts, and the only way to prevent global catastrophe is to . . .
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs094/en/
Per the World Health Organization,
“In 2012, malaria caused an estimated 627,000 deaths (with an uncertainty range of 473 000 to 789 000), mostly among African children.”
Yes malaria kills, but No, that does not prove that “envirofascists killed untold thousands by demanding that malaria continue to kill people”.
North of 60, you should realize you are the least informed one here. What he is talking about was the irrational banning of DDT based on questionable harm done to birds. After that African countries could not get DDT to suppress their mosquito populations and malaria went out of control killing millions of people there, mostly kids.
Enviros traded the lives of a few birds for the deaths of millions of people. Look it up and then sit there smug in your Berkley that nature lovers can do no wrong.
An interesting prelude to the article can be found here:
http://quadrant.org.au/opinion/doomed-planet/2014/06/edge-cold-deep-abyss/
Of particular interest is that this theory was introduced in 1979.
What Joey, Grok, and Jay said.
This is easy, let’s ask the question:
Will they want to burn more fossils to keep the world warm?
Kate–Assuming you’ve read Steve G’s posts today? Esp. http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/06/27/who-is-steven-goddard/ Brilliant and sincere. The quest for truth (a reason I frequent your blog also)…
We need to spread the message!
Your assumption about DDT’s effect on birds is incorrect, but if it makes you feel good to believe it, then go right ahead. If personal insults make you feel better then go for that too. It’s good to see demonstrations of the sort of character that follows those beliefs.
The places where malaria kills are all overpopulated and they can’t feed themselves, it’s all part of the planetary balance with species that overpopulate their regional carrying capacity.
Malaria killed people in Canada historically, and there hasn’t been an upsurge of cases here since DDT was banned.
Around this subject
http://thepointman.wordpress.com/2014/06/26/why-the-developing-world-hates-environmentalists/
Jay in Calgary: What determines a region’s “carrying capacity”?
Many factors influence whether a population can or “can’t feed themselves”. Singapore and the Dubai use trade (a product of culture) to overcome their limited potential for caloric creation (agricultural growth). Should we just abandon all the places that today lack the culture to engage in global or regional trade, and let them die in waves of famine? In my travels in the ‘developing’ world (that implies ‘changing’, btw) I’ve seen many places that used to suffer such waves of famine–that now engage in trade and can feed themselves. So your concept of a ‘planetary balance’ may be valid in the absence of cultural/societal/economic/technological advancement–but humans through our science, creativity/ingenuity and other assets continue to redefine that balance. Your neglect of that fact evokes Ehrlich.
My comments do not imply that I endorse bird-killing via DDT, btw. I think we’ve tasked a sufficient number of windmills to do that work for us already.
Also Jay–Malaria used to kill in North America–which was not overpopulated.
OK, so in my rush to pack for the weekend and read this blog (not a good combination of efforts), I misread your comments Jay from Calgary–my apologies. Kate, pls feel free to delete all my remarks in this thread.
Everyone have a great weekend!
Also Jay–Malaria used to kill in North America–which was not overpopulated.
Malaria has killed in Siberia….what I feel is that in naming the greatest mass murderers in recorded history….Mao,Stalin,Hitler,Khmer Rouge….everybody forgets Rachel Carson and her fellow eco-freaks,to many of who are still alive and kicking.Ain’t over yet.Maybe in 10,000 years when we come out of the Dark Ages we are heading for,some historian will figure it out,but I’m an optimist,so,eh,who knows.
Getting frazillions of bees killed by pesticides v. people by ddt denial. What a world.
Getting frazillions of bees killed by pesticides v. people by ddt denial. What a world.
Huh?
I guess saying that spraying bees is ok and spraying folks is suspect, denying an outcome.
‘cept the bee keeps say different. I’ll believe the bee keepers before activists and Beaurokraps or you
No-one has established the bee die-off’s cause……a virus is suspected.
Extensive research was done with DDT…..including feeding DDT to convicts(volunteers) in prisons for a period of two years and to 2 laying chicken farms for a period of two years. No ill affects nor problems with shell strength was detected.
The WHO and EPA were new agencies at the time and needed to justify their existence and so banned DDT….no science…..just bureaucrats protecting their “iron rice bowels”.
Purple starfish are dying in vast numbers here on the West Coast. Just the purple ones. NME should investigate – surely it must be something we terrible humans are causing.
I read an article many years ago at a site call CO2science.org. the person who wrote the article said that based on their studies, that by 2030 the average temp would drop by about 1.3 degrees, I do not remember if that was Celsius or not. there was science surrounding that premise some time ago.