I have a question. We have two more sound bites of the president here specifying right-wing talk radio, but I have a question: How come we’re supposed to draw (on the basis of no evidence), a connection between conservatism and terrorism, conservative ideology and terrorism? Where is that connection? Yet we are told we must reject, despite tons of evidence, the connection between Islamist ideology and terrorism. So we can’t call Islamist fundamentalists “terrorists.” We can’t even use the word. But we can have ex-presidents and current presidents running around trying to associate conservatives with nonexistent terrorism at peaceful tea parties. Somebody needs to explain this to me.
Related: “Calling Tea Partiers ‘stupid’ and ‘losers’ hasn’t worked. Time to start calling them ‘educated’ and ‘privileged’.”
If I was placing odds on the risks of violence at a Tea Party Protest, I’d have to go with an unhinged lefty causing a man-made disaster.
Hey,Google one third of Americans say own govt a threat.People are waking up at an ever increasing rates the next thing will be a majority of Americans expect govt to stage false flag attacks.
That is a powerful paragraph El Rushbo put together. I wish I’d thought of it.
Rush, summing it up for ya in 5 minutes.
http://www.breitbart.tv/limbaugh-blasts-clinton-didnt-waco-raid-inspire-okc-bombing
I haven’t a link for it, but read earlier today how Bill Clinton’s first commentary regarding the Oklahoma bombing was his hope that this didn’t have anything to do with the middle east…
I would never consider or suggest any sort of terrorist act, but I can tell you I have met a lot of idiotic lefties that I would love to slap hard upside the head as they say. Sometimes words just don’t cut it.
This is part of the Democratic campaign to discredit any and all who dissent.
They at first tried to ignore the Tea Parties, going so far as to pretend that they didn’t even exist. This failed so their next tactic was The Smear, with the term ‘Tea Baggers’. This failed.
The next tactic and one that they will use frequently during the coming months is ‘they are all racists’. This too will fail but they will keep up this theme because it is so ambiguous and impossible to prove/disprove.
Their tactic is to say that ‘Being a Racist’ is proven by the number of ‘black people’ in photo images of the rallies. This is hardly evidence of racism, for after all, the Tea Parties are acts of choice. It’s up to the black people to choose to come – and since the majority of them are either Democrats or, support Obama because of his ‘race’ (heh, how’s that for racism?)..then, who is the racist in this situation?
Do the Democrats really want the Tea Party organizers to insist that ‘minority’ groups be compelled to attend? So, ‘racism’ will be a constant theme all summer.
Then, there’s the violence theme. That’s going to be used just as much, for the Democrats are working hard now to establish an MSM connection in people’s minds that the Tea Parties are directly connected with violence and extremism.
As pointed out by Limbaugh, Obama has forbidden the connection between Islamism and violence; yet, he and his team are busily working to set up a false connection within the Tea Parties.
And, I’ll even bet that they are hoping for some blow-up during the next months; they have to discredit the American people-who-dissent. That’s apostasy, remember.
If Bill “Devil with the blue dress on” Clinton would open his eyes long enough, he would see this….
“Public confidence in government is at one of the lowest points in a half century, according to a survey from the Pew Research Center. Nearly 8 in 10 Americans say they don’t trust the federal government and have little faith it can solve America’s ills, the survey found.”
When the government operates in the manner that the Obama administration has, against the will of the people, it had better prepare itself for a backlash. Because it is coming.
So, a memo to Clinton. Get YOURSELVES in line and don’t point fingers.
How about “stupid highly-educated privileged losers”?
Run for the hills Clintons the people are figuring out how the financial crisis was orchestrated by the Democrat party from Carter to you, finally.
Billy boy and Barry O are just creating an imaginary enemy of terrorists for when they begin rounding up the dissenters and calling them the terrorists you’ve heard so much about in the news(Complicit MSM).
Typical Marxist tactics.
It’s not just Democrats who slander dissenters; it’s universities, as well. We’ve infantilised generations and allowed morons to curtail speech and dissent.
Take out billboard space. Wear a t-shirt. Print off a pamphlet. Enough with this crap!
I find it interesting that when in wartime, it is important (and a rule of war) to not only discredit, but to dehumanize the enemy so that young soldiers will have less hesitation and emotional conflict killing them. I suppose that’s why Obama is making such extensive use of drones.
Yet Obama forbids any dissent toward the Jihadists whom we are a war with, but has no problem looking for any reason to treat the Tea Partiers as sub human scum.
But then the Left traffics in hypocrisy don’t they.
That’s why Rush has a $400-million/8 year contract with an 8 figure signing bonus 🙂
Worth every cent.
Check out Atlas.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/04/mcveigh-mania.html
I remember my father commenting on the Oklahoma Bombing, ” those two white boys are too dumb and broke to have done that alone.” He was seventy-one in 1995, he read newspapers and watched television, nothing added up in his mind.
Washington insiders don’t understand the tea party movement because they can’t; the notion of a political movement that wants to reduce government power — not just redirect it — is too foreign.
Richard Fernandez
Obviously Slick willy isn’t happy being in the shadow of Shrillary . . . this is just his pathetic way of lashing out in a way that he knows the Lame Street Media will take the bait.
Hook, line & sinker.
Strange that Bubba is using the Oklahoma bomber as an example (of some incoherent linkage from anti-statist words) when his cabinet (Janet Reno) ordered the barbecuing of the Waco families which allegedly inspired McVey. Branch Dravidian’s may have been wackos but so are millions of green Kool Aid consumers amongst us and I don’t recall any reports of violence or threats coming from their compound.
The left is terrified that the Tea parties represent real political strength and I hope to hell that paranoia is justified.
Amen to all of the above.
The Obamaites are working on some heavy duty operations to smear the opposition, no doubt. It would be logical to have it also blow back on some of the less flexible members of the Secret Service who might be cramping Big Owe’s style at the moment.
There will never be anything to stop people in a free society from crossing their wires, seeing that the equation is 2+2, and getting the answer blow up Oklahoma City.
In simpler times, this was known as mental illness.
How it affects the debate today is an obscure point indeed. If the tea party movement ever evolved into a resistance movement with a military aspect, they would presumably choose sensible and morally defensible military targets.
A day care centre is not exactly either of those.
However, we are years from that level of societal breakdown in the U.S. — whether it’s two years, five, or longer, remains to be seen.
Anyone who thinks this entire situation with the cultural elites being communist and the ordinary people being conservative, will end well, is dreaming. The only question is when all democratic options will appear exhausted and the ordinary people start looking at their revolutionary options, which are in fact counter-revolutionary options, but the rules for either thing are the same — declare, prevail, rewrite history.
Bruce Wayne Riley.If you like I can point you in the direction of the truth.The Oklahoma bombing was a false flag attack ordered by Bill himself at the behest of his bosses at the CFR.Not the Canadian Finals Rodeo the Council on Foreign Relations.An excellent explanation is provided on movie called Invisible Empire available now on You Tube.
Mikeg. If people can believe that Bush blew up the World Trade Centre they can believe Clinton blew up the building in Oklahoma. That might actually be a fun discussion point next time I meet someone who claims the World Trade Centre was an inside job.
Gord.Challenge yourself,watch Invisible Empire and see if it does not cause you to question the establishment.There are many things that simply dont add up.Jason Bermas has done a great job on this.He made three minor factual errors but the rest is really good,dont be afraid to learn something.Remember the Taxed Enough Allready Parties were part of the Ron Paul movement to begin with.Americans are embracing the truth movement in greater numbers every week.
there is a point to be made with w having on his desk all of the hi jackers what wepons they would use and what there targets were,and just,leaving it lay there,and going on yet another vacation to Fa. then there is the vidieo of him reading to the children,and being told of the attact on are country and sitting there silently for 17 minutes doing nothing, long before this time frame he should have been releived of his command,buy or constitution so lets talk about that! and others,like stopping the recount of the votes to steal the election! with his brothers help and others that all moved up to hi ranking positions in his cabnet! starting to smell isnt it!
I read a book by McVeigh’s lawyer a year or so ago. Obviously a little skepticism is in order when a man’s lawyer writes a book, although he never denied McVeigh’s involvement, but laid out a number of interesting questions and facts which the federal government seemed to have absolutely no interest in pursuing once they had a suspect.
For example, the mark of a successful and well planned bombing is leaving a couple of people behind to deflect blame and muddy the trail. For example, the world Trade Center where those two guys tried to get their deposit back on the rental truck. They were considered really stupid – actually it was their role in the plot.
And apparently nobody tries to drive a large fertilizer bomb over bad roads for a long distance because they tend to go boom!
Who knows.
Gord .If your not watching the movie yet maybe you could give me a plausible explanation why Goldman Sachs is allowed to implode the economies of sovereign nation states with impunity.Sure Sachs has to answer to the SEC for their derivatives scheme but isnt that like letting the devil investigate himself.
Ole Billy boy & his harridan of a wife. Always did believe in a “Right wing Conspiracy”. How else to explain Clintons wandering third leg?
Apparently they truly believe the Myth.
As for the amazing disappearing of any mention of real worldwide Islamic Jihad. Well, there Obama’s friends after all.
Being fellow Marxists travelers aboard the tyranny train. He has to cover for them if America is to become part of the future Caliphate.
Go after patriots with guns or bibles is mantra. With h the legion of despots with him. Yearning for the day they can eliminate any adversary to gainsay their ideology of Death & ultimate control.
JMO
Back to the original post, it’s this simple. Bill and Obama and all the left-leaning pundits know they can label the tea party folks extremist and possible terrorists because they know there will be no repercussions. They know that none of those middle class, law abiding people will ever cross the line by carrying out anything violent. They steer away from commenting on Islamic violence because they know the odds are good that some radicalized Muslim will actually respond with violence. They are cowards whose integrity doesn’t reach the end of their noses.
It’s akin to how the western artistic and literary world, which goes out of its way to make harsh, critical “statements” about Christianity – the cross in a vat of piss, Mary splattered with cow dung, etc. – has been self censoring itself in relation to Islamic repression and violence. They know good and well that they have nothing to fear from Catholics or Protestants other than some peaceful protests -which is probably exactly what they are after; nothing rockets an artist to the top faster than a protest from “reactionaries”. I even saw an interview with some “artist,” who has made his reputation by criticizing and poking fun of Christianity, who admitted that Islam was off limits. He was too frightened by the possibility of violence. Basically, he was admitting that his need to offer up his “truth” would be limited to subjects who he knew wouldn’t hit back. Cowards all.
I have been reading stories from unemployed people in the States whose benefits are running out (Google Unemployed Stories). Truly scary. There are a lot of desperate people out there.
While all this is going on, the State of Arizona just repealed their permit requirement for concealed carry of a firearm, and today passed a new law regarding illegal aliens.
So as of July or so there’s no permit to carry a gun, and if you are illegally in the USA the local cops are allowed to bust you.
I predict a large, permanent drop in murder and robbery rates for Arizona.
So, despite the wall-to-wall DemocRat propaganda on MSM airwaves, the more-freedom-smaller-government message is getting through to politicians interested in keeping their jobs.
Let us see now;
CLINTON 2010:
“When I became president, it’s hard to remember this; there were only 50 sites on the World Wide Web.”
The former occupant of the WH is obviously not happy that word get’s out and around without any control from the totalitarian leaning politicos.
“Among those who first saw its potential and made use of it were those who used the Internet to do all kinds of interesting things, including share information on how to make bombs.”
The former occupant of the WH is pretending to be willfully ignorant of the world around him. Here he is projecting that the internet should be limited because of bomb making information while knowing for certain from his time at the WH that those that want that kind of information would get information, what ever they want by internet or countless other means. Here he is making statement: internet, bad, everybody has an opinion, can’t have that.
“We didn’t have blog sites back then, so the instrument of carrying this forward was basically the right-wing radio talk show hosts.”
These stupid statements are obviously meant for the echo chamber that he resides in, is he pretending that current occupant does not staff blog coming out of the WH? Is he ignorant of Daily Kos and hundred of other blogs that carry his message? Don’t think so.
“They understood that emotion was more powerful than reason.”
There is really no reason in what he is saying, he is obviously emoting to his followers.
“They got much bigger listenership and more advertisers and more commercial success if they kept people in the white heat.”
What does the mean?
“For 99% of them, it was just that: Turn on the radio, listen to somebody say something you agree with, vent your anger.”
“They”, who ever “they” are, should perhaps turn off the damn radio and listen only to the Big Brother, because he speaks the way to everlasting sunshine.
Besides this, can somebody explain how to do italics in this window?
Thank you.
Ooookay, know the feeling. Tea anyone?
I liked him better when he was banging overweight Cynthia Dale look-a-likes.
I don’t believe in censorship, but can we just kill new’s total waste of bandwidth? I won’t respond to the troll since I scroll down all long messages to see who wrote them before reading (or not)- and I certainly won’t even try to respond to new’s drivel even if I could understand it.
Back to the subject, Bill Clinton makes about as much sense as new, but in a clearer style.
Well that was interesting! Dick Morris just said that Clinton ordered the raid on the Waco Wacko and Reno used that knowledge to be blackmail Clinton into reappointing her.
Joe Klein has actually stated in a TV interview that Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin (!) and Rush Limbaugh might be guilty of sedition. He pointed out that before the interview he looked the word up in the dictionary. And there I was thinking that word was antiquarian, obsolete.
We are now in the early stages of a highly co-ordinated propaganda assault by the DemComs and the Democratic Media Machine.
It won’t work.
When it comes from blow job, I did not have sex with that woman Billy, it’s really quite simple, just consider the source.
Phantom, Sheriff Joe’s impact in Arizona is bearing fruit!
When is being stupid going too become illegal??
Rush had a pretty good answer to the attempted smears of racism against the Tea Party Movement.
To paraphrase: There’s a reason most members of the Tea Party are white and it’s the same reason most members of ACORN are black. They were born that way.
As I say often … know your enemy.