I recall having a teacher whom I didn’t like because she was always unloading us … for no good reason. But, I’ve got to admit, that when she unloaded on people I didn’t like … it felt kind’a good.
3:46 of delicious high dudgeon.
And for dessert, Jiminy Glick has a hissy:
Glorious!
Wow!! O’Reilly gets my vote!
Oh wait…
wowsers. that was fun! thank you.
Frank and the dhimmicrats have their grubby hands all over this financial scandal. The unintended (maybe intended) consequences of social engineering. Heaven help the USA.
Thankfully Hannity is on Fox or it would be totally unwatchable. O’Rielly really has lost it…….. if he ever had it.
mmmm…yummy desserts!
Classic..”She in with no assistance from her husband.”
That’s gonna confuse some angry feminists.
Saw them both last night. Delightful.
Doesn’t Allan Colmes look like a Klingon?
And THAT’S why I watch Fox.
Being unable to watch the O’Rielly clip for more than 30 seconds or so, I decided to pause it and just click various points through the time line.
At no point did he have his mouth closed. I managed to find two bits where Frank’s mouth was actually closed.
More like 3:46 of a rancid steaming heap of inanity. Classic O’Reilly.
Do you really think faux news’ resident sleazebag Dick Morris has one iota of credibility??
With anyone with an IQ above their shoe size, I mean.
Caught that too eh bluetech? Classic is correct.
My,my. The Red tories(atlanticjim,manny)are really upset about O’Reilly. What’s the problem,boys? It’s OK for your lefties to be rude,insulting,and down right ignorant,but a rightie can’t respond to that? Tolerance…NOT.
manny ,manny, manny. Calm down. Look at a picture of Olberman or something.
Red tory? Me? Pull yer head out of yer backside nothinkin.
Anyone who thinks that O’Rielly is a conservative needs a dictionary. He would not recognize a conservative thought if it head butted him.
Thankfully they have Hannity for a voice of reason.
I wouldn’t be too hard on O’Reilly…it’s all relative. We are so used to soft balls…no.. make that nerf ball being handed to Libs by the media when they mess up.O’Reilly isn’t letting anyone off the hook…he’s calling out the ‘whole Federal government’ on this.
O’Reilly is the extreme opposite of Mansbridge.
It’s about time someone in the media acted on calling the mess what it is(like bloggers are doing) instead of the boring day to day ‘report.’
“Frank and the dhimmicrats have their grubby hands all over this financial scandal.”
no kidding
http://tinyurl.com/4p6bfs
Don’t forget, Morris is credited with being the brains behind the Clinton victories, much like Rove/Bush.
don’t forget the great Reno, who threatened legal action if the numbers of “visible minorities” didn’t rise in the accepted column of the mtg. balance sheet
Good catch bluetech. It was a classic. Orilley probably had a sh*tload of money in there and is mad as hell that maybe his stock went down.
Loved it. O’Reilly’s was a tad o/t. But he said he was mad, would name names and would hold people responsible. None of it stuck to teflon Frank though, and no one else will dare come on the show.
AC deserves the take down, and it was a good one. Rove has done it also, but much less forcefully.
Can’t ruffle the programmed AC, although a kick in the hard drive might help.
I thought it revealing that when Allan Colmes wanted to disprove McCain’s concern for the middle class, he cited McCain’s opposition to a raising of the minimum wage. In my opinion, raising the minimum wage does nothing for the middle class, but pretending that it does is in line with the “concern” for that class that Democrat’s suddenly acquire prior to an election.
Yes atlanticjim…..you are so far right,you think you’re in left field(which you are).Been there,raised there,got the TS. And now which part of the welfare state which is the Maritimes are you working for? As they say Lotto 7/45. Work 7 weeks,collect UI for 45.Only in NB,NS,PEI,and NFLD.
O’Reilly is a megalomaniacal a**hole. It is not his job to abuse guests no matter how correct his view or how scummy the guest is.
I’m as conservative as it gets but I think O’Reilly is a creep. He is a very bad advertisement for conservatism and adds to the Herculean task of winning over borderline liberals.
Please refrain from insulting each other, ok?
The chairman of the SEC went on O’Reilly and admitted he’d screwed up.
Barney Frank, chairman of the House Finance Committee, whose responsibiilty it actually is to make sure these financial dealings are on the up-and-up did not admit his inaction had a part to play in this mess.
That’s what set O’Reilly off: ‘So, it’s everybody else’s fault but yours?’ is classic.
Frank’s inability to admit any culpability in this turn of events shows where the Democrats are at.
They blame Bush for what? For not telling Frank he was supposed to be protecting the American public from this eventuality?
That’s Frank’s job, not Bush’s.
If he would have taken some responsibility, like the SEC guy did, O’Reilly would not have jumped down his throat with both feet.
Good for O’Reilly. He has publicly stated he’s not going to let anybody get away with this, that he’s going to track down all the perpetrators and call them out.
Grow up Barney and take some responsibility.
University of California Berkeley Study proves,
Children described as “feeling easily victimized, easily offended, indecisive, fearful, rigid, inhibited and relatively over-controlled and vulnerable” favored CONSERVATIVE politics when they grew up.”
Righto. Sorry for the insults Kate.
Question for liberaleducator…is that conservative as in small”c” conservative,or as in large “C”?? There is a difference.Which one does the study refer to?
Could we get a link to that study liberaleducator?
Of course Berkeley is a totally impartial source of information on political viewpoints, right?
Liberaleducator is a waste of letters, we already know that the vast majority of educators are either Liberal, far left wing and a smallish number of communist.
That can’t be a quotation,i.e., with the word ‘Conservative’ in capitals. I also doubt that such a study has any validity.
First, correlating such a large number of variables (8!!): ‘feeling easily victimized, easily offended, indecisive, fearful, rigid, inhibited and relatively over-controlled and vulnerable” – with most of these variables subjective values and therefore not objective or quantifiably measurable – is in itself a biased study.
Then, attempting to link this arbitrary SET of 8 variables to ONE result (Conservative) is impossible.
After all, what variables have been excluded from this study? What are the control variables?
In other words – this is pure junk as a study, if indeed it even exists.
… if indeed it even exists. LOL.
I actually lost a friendship once when I told the guy, “listen man, the next time you tell me ‘studies show’ I’m asking for chapter and verse”. I didn’t learn this until many years later.
liberaleducator actually contains two problems. The two words result in a redundancy, and the second word is a euphemism
hey can you remember in school when the 3 Rs ment READ,RITITTEN and RITHMATIC and not REDUCE,REUSE,RECYCLE? like the greenfreaks are shoving in thier heads today SCREW THE GREENS
So, liberaleducator, you’re saying that there’s a study that says that people who, as children, have to deal with bullying (feeling easily victimized), are sensitive (easily offended), have thought through much of their choices and waited until they are more experienced to make responsible ones (indecisive), have their eyes opened too early to the problems of the world (fearful), and have developed disciplinary and responsible coping mechanisms at an early age (rigid, inhibited and relatively over-controlled and vulnerable) choose conservative? Well, hardly surprising to us conservatives that the more sensitive and truly introspective should do so, don’tcha think?
I’m still waiting for the Berkley study that proves that liberals are from Neptune and conservatives are from Uranus. I’ve got a feeling they’re getting closer and closer to it.
http://www.thrfeed.com/2008/10/vp-debate-ratin.html
“Final: 69,989,000 viewers — Palin-Biden the most-watched vp debate ever
83097955UPDATED: Thursday’s highly anticipated face-off between Alaska governor Sarah Palin and Delaware senator Joe Biden was the most-watched vp debate of all time.
Last night’s event was seen by nearly 70 million viewers, according to Nielsen Media Research.
That’s the most-viewed debate — presidential or vp — since the second round between Bill Clinton, Ross Perot and George Bush in 1992, and possibly the most since 1980’s famed debate between Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter.
Thursday’s event was 33% higher than Friday’s top-of-the-ticket debate between John McCain and Barack Obama. It’s 61% higher than the 2004 debate between Dick Cheney and John Edwards. And it ranks 23% higher than the former title-holder for the most-watched vp debate — the 1984 match between George Bush and Geraldine Ferrarro (56.7 million).”
I think we have a new nickname for the VP candidacy:
“Sarahcuda the Im-Palinator”
Any way you slice this it, this gal has turned the Republican ticket into a winner.
Kudos to John McCain for an incredibly shrewd choice. All John has to do is work this ticket for the next four weeks, by taking the high road on ditching the toxic sub prime waste and exposing the systemic nature of the beast.
The “take no prisoners” approach of corporate raiders and leaving no leveraged profit unspoiled is not the sound footing to put the economy on.
If you leave no lo hanging fruit for the field gleaners you wind up with a severely injured economy.
Sometimes a little bit of charity goes a long ways, but the scorched earth approach is definitely over.
Cheers
Hans-Christian Georg Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
Frankenstein Battalion
2nd Squadron: Ulanen-(Lancers) Regiment Großherzog Friedrich von Baden(Rheinisches) Nr.7(Saarbrucken)
Knecht Rupprecht Division
Hans Corps
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”
That might explain why conservatives are less likely to tolerate a bunch of crap.
Hey, c’mon, take in easy on Barney, he’s a man’s man….er, um…..yup!
Hey, c’mon, take it easy on Barney, he’s a man’s man….er, um…..yup!
nice to see DanBC’s homophobia. What would a SDA thread be without racism or homophobia?
It’s interesting how you Righties so love thugs like o’Reilly and Limbaugh. You fancy yourselves conservatives and someof you even call yourselves “Christians”. But you like these guys who can’t abide by laws of basic decency or mature civil discourse.
That goes for Ann Coulter and her wanna-be disciples such as the webmistress here and K Shaidle. The more snide, rude and even racist they get, and you guys eat it up.
Honestly, it really makes one wonder whether your political views are a justification for a serious deep-eated emotional problem. What mature person would want to have their worldview represented by the ignorant, bellowing O’Reilly?
I think Oreilly was a little over the top but on the issue they were dealing with he was dead-on right. Barney Frank tried to weasel out of what he actually said. He accused Oreilly or “misrepresenting” what he said. Oreilly did no such thing. The tape is there for all to see and hear. I played the thing thru once and watched the Frank tape again and Oreilly was bang on with his challenge to Frank to take responsibility.
Lets face it, Oreilly is like a bull in a china shop but Frank knew that going in. I fully agree with Oreilly’s contention that Frank should step down as Chair of the House Banking Committee though I may not agree with his style.
I think Bill O-Reilly is voicing a lot of Americans’ concerns here.
Great; that made me feel better
Un-real
real babbled: “…serious deep-eated emotional problem”.
Yeah, my blood sugar goes off too if I don’t drink enough. Gee, John, what would ya know about decency? You haven’t made a respectful post on this blog yet. Or is just another case of standard lefty “do as I say not as I do”.
What mature person would want to listen to anything you have to say about any view?
“feeling easily victimized, easily offended, indecisive, fearful, rigid, inhibited and relatively over-controlled and vulnerable”
Sounds more like Dion, Duceppe, and Layton than any conservative I know.
These studies are worse than useless, they have virtually no validity. There are too many parameters, so there’s no way of validating the outcome, even if they followed their subjects from cradle to grave. What child doesn’t have any or all of those feelings at one point or another?
Coincidence is not correlation and correlation is not causation. We are not preprogrammed or hardwired as some of the social scientists want us to believe.
I like Bill O-Reilly . May disagree with his tone or ideas at times. But he does at least try to stand up for the normal guy. He ought to watch his blood pressure though, or he’ll end up with a heart attack like me.
Reminds me of Sam Kinnison from the movie “Back to School” … SAY IT! … SAY IT!….
“It is not his job to abuse guests…” Oh contraire, the name of the show is The O’Reilly Factor. It is his frikkin’ show. Yeah, on occasion (or more) he goes over the top but seriously, someone has to ask why Barney Frank doesn’t think his shiat stinks. Besides the fact that he and others are up to their eyeballs in this stuff, he plays the innocent and tries to dump everything on anyone but the Dems and himself. Facts that theMSM seem to forget.
Ever wonder why when the first bill failed to pass it was the 12 Republican that didn’t vote for it that were at fault and not the Democrats, many of whom are big shots on several financial committees? Look it up sometime, it is precisely the reason you shouldn’t take the MSM at it’s word.
Pretty clear that the leftoids can dish it out but they sure can’t take it. These bullies have had it their way far too long. Now that the right is pushing back their feelings are hurt. Boohoo.
The Dems own the credit crisis, but they are in denial. They know they can get away with it because the judiciary & media will cover for them.
Sorry Kate, but I will not stand by and allow justhinkin’s comment stand.
What do I do for a living? 17 years into a career in Her Majesty’s Canadian Navy. What have YOU done for your country lately?
Dick Morris gives not so much a hissy fit as a rather deft and well deserved smack down of an idiot. And Jiminy Glick is pure comic genius.