House of Commons administration is keeping files on what Canadians say about their MPs. The “very robust records management system” included social media posts, said the Deputy Sergeant-at-Arms: “We have different categories, if they are misogynistic, etcetera.”
Man oh man! Just wait till Pee-pee hears about this!
What’s that? He’s known for years?
The deputy sergeant at arms should be fired with the cohort of scumbags that want to keep record of people that don’t agree with the low life politicians and want to use it for utterly nefarious purposes.
This is what the so called ‘Liberal’ government is blowing money on, liberally.
These low life characters should experience homelessness and starvation, at minimum.
And now, you can save that, you no good waste of skin.
Apology for being so nice to the low lifes.
I’m just surprised that anyone is surprised by this info.
There has been news readers and clippers for decades keeping track of anything that was said or printed, including letters to editors. Now with the expansion of social media replacing most MSM feeds, its only logical that this work would be expanded.
AI empowered search engines will only make this faster and simpler to do, finding and categorizing without human intervention. Reporting even becomes easier to do with these search engines.
Big Brother has always been watching.
It would be ironic if the very people they are trying to protect are the first ones that get caught by the AI program
Could also be used for “search and destroy” to protect these people.
Interesting that the government can develop a “very robust records management system” when it comes to what their constituents are saying about them, but try to keep track of illegal immigrants, pedophiles on the Internet, people watching child porn, drug dealing, illegal border crossing, etc – not possible.
Why would the liberals keep track of their voters?
Because they like them so much.
Is that more of Carney’s ‘European Style Fascism’?
We need more ‘American Style Free Speech’.
So we are not allowed to criticize people whos greatest skill in life is climbing the greasy pole?
Fortunately, the worst thing I’ve ever said publicly about an MP is, “Who the hell is that jackass?” I think I’m reasonably safe. Unless of course some member of my family picks a fight with the Liberal Party, in which case watch how fast they release the hounds, but frankly I think we’re all past that point anyway. I’m not worried. Famous last words, eh?
C.A.G.E. has a very robust records management system for people who abuse power.
This sounds exactly like something a government in a free, fair, and open society would do.
Democracy!
Nevermind … that’s what the Constitutionally challenged Democrats cry
Not surprised really, Sgt-at-arms office are all mostly ex-RCMP black shirt jack boot fascists pretenders anyway. Them LEOs don’t change their spots.
When I “liked” and re-posted the image of the new SCOC bronze statue, which many others have ridiculed as well, my first thought was, “how will this look when I’m trying to defend myself in court someday”
and, I did it anyways, because I don’t actually fear the gov’t of tier 2 Canada quite as much as I should, apparently.
When our (Rebel Media and Juno/True North News) canary in the coalmine are brought back in front of the bench of “human rights” we’ll all know we’ve crossed the line.
Does anyone think the Deputy Sgt at Arms has an arabic or farsi staff for what those people have to say?
Speech codes began November 4th 2008.
Time to flood the zone.
All patriots and haters of communist despots need to begin to send tweets and LTEs and whatnot approving of everything that your government disapproves of.
It’s easier to hide a needle in a huge pile of needles than by itself. “Give me a list of all of the rebels!” “Uh, comrade, there are 10 million people on that list.”
‘Hate speech’ Laws mean no speech at all. You have been silenced.