What the IPCC really says about extreme weather.
…for those who want to know what research actually says on the relationship of extreme weather and climate change, that information is readily available. Today I’ll share the excellent work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) summarizing what its most recent assessment says about various types of extreme weather and climate change.
When you read the below you will realize that the difference between what you see in the news (including statements from leading scientists) and what the IPCC has concluded could not be more different. One day PhD dissertations will be written about our current moment of apocalyptic panic.
“Hot enough for you? No? Change the measurement.”
The “No?” link in the last sentence is broken
They’ll be taking their heat measurements over active volcanoes next.
Is any thinking person really surprised?
Temperature tracking stations used to be spread out.
Now they are just in big cities.
If you believe what government or their bought and paid for associates report you are part of the problem.
List of U.S. weather stations, including all the ones illegally laid out:
http://surfacestations.org/
Although the site is no longer active, I think.
You may have noticed the massive propaganda in the so called ‘news’ where they hammer the population with current high temperature and claim it’s global warming, completely ignoring by omission and avoiding to say that it is due the recent gigantic solar flare.
“The Sun Just Unleashed a Huge Solar Flare, Triggers Radio Blackout in US”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/the-sun-just-unleashed-a-huge-solar-flare-triggers-radio-blackout-in-us/ar-AA1doxwt
The Summary for Policymakers is where all the spin, swim and specious claims originate, often bearing no relationship, if not outright contradicting the IPCC report, itself suspect given it’s “intergovernmental,” in this case unelected intergovernmental.
This is political science fiction, aka junk science, iow not science in any shape or form; nothing but a modern day inquisition.
Has been from day one when the environmentalists agreed CAGW was a theory, then one day it was “proved,” on “consensus.”
Nonsense from then, the fruit of the false prophets the tell – doubling down on taxing the poor to stop others from buying trucks, while Europe spews diesel, Africa is starved and China imports our coal, sells us back wind turbines and solar panels, while laughing their asses off at our folly that makes them rich and if all goes according to plan, more powerful than us – our future rulers – who consider us decadent failures, easy to manipulate, and that’s just our leadership. Hopefully it’s not us or we’re sunk.
So climate science predicted Doom for the last 90 years and non of their doomsday predictions materialized. They start to sound like a broken record repeating the same warnings with only changed end dates. In 1934 science warned us “Will melting ICEBERGS engulf world?” including a picture of a flooded Manhattan just like the warning we heard in 2007. And is Manhattan flooded today? When they hadn’t been right once the last 90 years, why are we listening to them?
https://realclimatescience.com/melting-glaciers/
You seem to be missing the glaringly obvious. Two thirds of the “temperature measurements” (actual data) here are “will be”, that is, in the future. I would expect that, if one had been invented, a time travel machine would make huge worldwide headlines. No such headlines have been seen. Therefore, no time travel exists, and it was and is impossible to travel to the future and measure the temperature.
Therefore, the “will be”, most of the “data” seen here, is fiction. It is something that cannot be proven, minus a time travel machine. If it cannot be falsified, it is, by definition, not science.
At the most generous, it is a hypothesis, a guess with numbers, which cannot be proven and is therefore not yet science. These people have been falsified, the numbers measured not being the same as their guesses of what the numbers should be, every time so far on their previous guesses. The logical conclusion is that these guesses are wrong also. And the other logical conclusion is, since we know these people get power, money, and prestige if the temperature goes up, and all these guesses are for it to go up, that they are flat out lying to get those things, and have been so for years.
Lack of time travel means this entire story is about an extremely obvious, even trivially obvious, lie. The fact that this story even exists is because a great number of people today have been educated and propagandized to be a sucker, patsy, victim, tool, pigeon, loser, dupe, pushover, target, gull, fool, soft touch, sap, idiot, moron, schlemiel, lunatic, monkey, mug, jackass, goose, butt, dolt, laughingstock, shlemiel, mock, simpleton, dunce, booby, blockhead, mockery, imbecile, ninny, simp, schnook, turkey, derision, nitwit, nincompoop, , dodo, schlub, dope, dummy, shlub, half-wit, cat’s-paw, mark, dumbbell, schlump, and yo-yo. And I am being easy on them.
Just read a smart thing on Gab. Climate change is when the government takes the change out of your pocket and puts it into their own. The weather stays the same.