A Speech In Cairo

Reuters;

Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif will tell U.S. President Barack Obama this week that Islamabad will not accept limits on its use of small tactical nuclear weapons, Pakistani officials said on Wednesday.
Pakistan insists smaller weapons would deter a sudden attack by its bigger neighbour India. But the United States worries tactical weapons may further destabilise an already volatile region because their smaller size makes them more tempting to use in a conventional war.

18 Replies to “A Speech In Cairo”

  1. “Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif”.
    I really hope he tells Jugears to f$ck himself, and the a44holes that got in with him.

  2. “This rule is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional warfare. I want to make it clear, this is not an Al Queda document, this is a Pakistani (military forces) document. A nuclear power is already on record in saying that they can justify nuclear weapons in jihad. That is true as a matter of fact. If you disagree, (then) you are wrong.”
    Stephen Coughlin paraphrasing a Pakistani Military document which describes how nuclear weapons and jihad are compatible.

  3. Bin Laden was living comfortably a mile away from a Pakistani military site, and they are floating the idea of nuking India? I don’t know why they are asking for permission, and I don’t believe the intended target.

  4. Never fear, never fear!
    Thank God Turdo la Doo has arrived on the world stage to heal things.

  5. Obama is so profoundly stupid that he doesn’t realize that when you’ve announced to the world by your lack of action that you’re no longer in the game, you don’t get to move the pieces or set the rules:
    Seriously … this bungling fool is a complete idiot!

  6. Obama supports Islamic jihad and using a nuke is more than acceptable. in fact anything is ok when engaging in jihad, there are no rules.

  7. The good citizens of Roseburg Oregon had a message for Obama when he went therea few weeks ago to oink for more gun control laws YOUR OT WECLOME Pakistan needs to tell obama the same thing

  8. How many times has India whipped Pakistan’s ass? 1947, 1965, 1971, 1999 plus continuous minor conflicts. I fear Pakistan would be dust were they to nuke India. They actually maintain a fighting military, unlike the west and they are used to seeing their wars through to the end. They don’t pee their pants and quit like Justin.

  9. Important thing to remember is that India has nukes too, as well as missiles to stick them on.
    In the old days a “tactical” nuclear weapon was classified as one that exploded in Germany. I guess these days it’ll be one that blows up in Pakistan.
    I’m kinda willing to sit back with my popcorn on this one.

  10. “because their smaller size makes them more tempting to use in a conventional war”
    That’s why they’re called “tactical” nukes. They’re supposed to be used in a conventional war. Duh.
    If you keep cutting the troop levels, Barry, the U.S. will be tempted to use tactical nukes in a conventional war too.

  11. *
    anybody who isn’t sh!ttin’ their pantaloons when they hear the words “pakistan” and “tactical nuclear weapons” in the same sentence is too stupid to live.
    these are the people who gave iran the schematics & tech to get on the nuclear scoreboard. they are willing and indeed eager to die for their god.
    be very afraid.
    *

  12. What’s the point of panicking?
    Who do you think is going to change Pakistan’s status quo or position on nuclear weapon use?
    Do you think the man who has guaranteed unhindered nuclear weapons development by Iran is going to change Pakistan’s stance on this issue?
    You only have to read up on Pakistan’s development of nuclear weapons to discover that they fully intend to be the aggressor in a nuclear war against India.

  13. Ah! International politics, like nature, abhors vacuum… Since Obama’s US and Turdeau’s Canada do not have anymore the appetite to deal with international issues like men (after all, their sensitivity-trained selves would feel quite at home at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee), leave to uncle Vlad to fill in the empty space. For example, by mid September of this year, Pakistan and Russia were in talks about the delivery of Sukhoi Su-35 fighter jets and previously agreed upon delivery of Mi-35M helicopters (HERE) and in August, squads from Russia, China, Pakistan, Venezuela, Belarus and Egypt took part in the “Masters of Air Defense Battle-2015 competition” held in Russia’s Krasnodar region. All the teams, except the Chinese, used Russian military equipment… (HERE). Oh, and let us not forget Vlad’s very palpable presence in Syria.

  14. “oz says… What’s the point of panicking? “
    you think the participants in a tactical nuclear exchange will be able to “eat just one?”
    anything like this will drag in allies on both sides and no one knows where that ends. pakistan is an ally in name only.
    ps… there is no central command & control on pakistan’s tac nukes… they are fired by commanders in the field. that’s why the u.s. is crappin’ their pants. the isi could put one in a shipping container and send it to manhattan this afternoon.
    jihad in a bottle.
    *

Navigation