Category: Margin Of Fraud

Margin Of Fraud

Margin Of Fraud 33 Comments

Liz Harrington; (thread)

There are over 20K unsubstantiated ballots in GA’s 2020 original results from tabulators that “do not exist” according to the Rossi/@KevinMoncla complaint.

Fulton County provided “proof” they exist.

Except their proof showed they used serial numbers for DIFFERENT machines.

There’s a word for this… Oh yes, fraud.

They claimed there was an ICP3 at the East Point Library during early voting.

Only problem: there were only two scanners there, according to Fulton County’s own checklist.

They did the same thing for a tabulator they claimed was at the South Fulton Service Center polling location.

They said there was a third tabulator, when there were only two.

When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal

Democrats Drain The Swamp Margin Of Fraud 10 Comments

Last week, on June 8th, the whistleblower advocacy firm Empower Oversight sent a letter to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, along with a packet of documents. The company represents an FBI employee whose security clearance was revoked after he attended the January 6th protests. No one disputes the Bureau’s right to investigate, but the Bureau’s Security Division did more than that, sending a bizarre questionnaire to the employee’s co-workers.

The FBI sent at least three co-workers a list of queries that began with the instruction, “You have a duty to reply to the questions… Should you refuse to answer or fail to reply fully and truthfully, action against your security clearance may be undertaken…”

Co-workers were then asked if they heard the employee:

“Vocalize support for President Trump?”

“Vocalize objection to Covid-19 vaccination?”

Whistlblower, eh? We’ll just see about that: Records Show FBI Provided Democrats with Information on Whistleblowers Who Testified at May 2023 Weaponization Hearing

McCovidism: Do you now or have you ever questioned the efficacy or safety of the covid vax?

Let That Sink In

#WalkAway CreepyJoeBiden Freespeechers Margin Of Fraud 2 Comments

Matt Taibbi;

Probably no one person or group in the Twitter Files was impacted in more different ways by new quasi-secret digital enforcement mechanisms than [Brandon] Straka and #WalkAway. Two U.S.-government-funded organizations, the Institute for Strategic Dialogue and the U.K.-based Global Disinformation Index, became sources for a USA Today claim that the group was among “73 U.S.-based hate groups” and “insurrectionists” who “had access to at least 54 means of raising money online.” Straka at the time had been charged in connection with his presence outside the January 6th Capitol riots, but not convicted. He was blocked by PayPal on March 20th, then Venmo, and ultimately Stripe, Patreon, Constant Contact, MailChimp, Facebook, Instagram and many other companies.

The idea of federally-funded organizations preventing a person from raising money for his own criminal defense against federal charges seemed astonishing. Equally remarkable was USA Today’s behavior. Americans are innocent until proven guilty. We also have an absolute Sixth Amendment right to counsel. But the paper targeted defendants’ efforts to “crowdfund their legal fees,” even claiming it was a kind of scandal that they’d been forced — by people like their own reporters! — to “spring from one fundraising tool to another, utilizing new sites, usernames and accounts” […]

Straka and #WalkAway in other words provide an early test case in the incredible range of state-aided or state-administered punishments that can be piled on someone before they’re convicted of a crime. He ended up sentenced to a class B misdemeanor, essentially for being at the Capitol on January 6th, receiving a 30-page sentencing recommendation. I polled defense lawyers last year and asked if they’d ever seen a 30-page sentencing recommendation for disorderly conduct before. “Fuck no,” laughed one, before quickly stopping and checking, “Wait, we’re not using names with this, right?”

Margin Of Fraud

Democrats Margin Of Fraud 29 Comments

Unpossible!

BREAKING: Baltimore Board Of Elections Supervisor believes that flash drives that contained ballots may have inserted into tabulators MULTIPLE times last week.

Election workers were caught last week overcounting the amount of votes cast.

“I’m leery about saying human error”

Several local elections there still remain undetermined.

Theft, In Plain Sight

Margin Of Fraud 19 Comments

More than 200,000 People On North Carolina Voter Rolls ‘Missing’ ID Numbers

North Carolina voter data lists more than 224,000 people with registration dates after January 2004 whose records are “missing” both the last four digits of their Social Security number (SSN) and a driver’s license identification number, according to public records obtained by The Federalist.

The 2002 Help America Vote Act (HAVA) required states to verify certain “information of newly registered voters for Federal elections,” according to the Social Security Administration. “Each State must establish a computerized State-wide voter registration list and verify new voter information with the State’s Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA).” These requirements went into effect on Jan. 1, 2004.

States must verify the would-be voter’s driver’s license number against the MVA database, but if an individual lacks a driver’s license then states must use the last four digits of his SSN, name, and date of birth. Notably, verifying a registrant’s SSN or driver’s license does not necessarily confirm his citizenship, since foreign nationals can obtain either.

The system is meant to ensure prospective voters are eligible. Yet in North Carolina, hundreds of thousands of registrations made it into the system without this verifying information, according to allegations from election integrity activists.

“We now have hundreds of thousands of ineligible, duplicate, deceased and non-citizen registrants bloating our voter lists — the breeding ground for election fraud,” North Carolina Election Integrity Team President Jim Womack said in a statement to The Federalist.

Margin Of Fraud

Margin Of Fraud 11 Comments

California DA Dropped Bombshell Election Data Case Because It Might Help Trump

L.A. County District Attorney George Gascon improperly — and for political reasons — dismissed the criminal charges against the CEO of election software services company Konnech, a governmental tort complaint filed Wednesday by the lead prosecutor on the case claims. That eight-page complaint against Gascon with the county Board of Supervisors further alleges the DA retaliated against his lead prosecutor for opposing the dismissal of the charges — and reveals many more previously unknown and troubling details about the entire case.

On Oct. 4, 2022, the L.A. County district attorney’s office announced Eugene Yu, the CEO of the Michigan-based Konnech, had been arrested in conjunction with criminal charges pending in California. In announcing Yu’s arrest, the DA’s office stated that “under its $2.9 million, five-year contract with the county, Konnech was supposed to securely maintain the data and that only United States citizens and permanent residents have access to it.” However, in violation of the contract, “information was stored on servers in the People’s Republic of China,” according to the press release.

Yu was later arrested and extradited to California, where the far-left Gascon eventually dismissed the criminal charges against Yu. L.A. County later also approved a $5 million payout to Yu to settle a civil lawsuit the Konnech CEO had filed against the government.

From a legal perspective, the dismissal of the criminal charges was baffling, as the criminal complaint filed against Yu stated that during the execution of a search warrant at Konnech, the government recovered evidence that employees had “sent personal identifying information of Los Angeles County election workers to third-party software developers who assisted with the creating and fixing [of] Konnech’s internal ‘PollChief’ software.” The criminal complaint further stated that a project manager for Konnech’s contract with L.A. County “confirmed via the messaging app DingTalk that any employee for Chinese contractors working on PollChief software had
‘superadministrative’ privileges for all PollChief clients.”

It’s long, grab a coffee. (Previous.)

Related: Democrat Lawyer HUMILIATED By Supreme Court Over J6 Obstruction Charge

Your Moral And Intellectual Superiors

Democrats Margin Of Fraud 9 Comments

Like dogs returning to their vomit;

After endlessly accusing Donald Trump and his supporters of trying to steal the 2020 election, the leftist legacy media is laying the groundwork for muddying the waters of the 2024 election in the event that the polls prove to be accurate and Joe Biden manages to lose. The closer we get to November, the more of this you are likely to see. And if a large number of non-citizen migrants wind up being caught voting, you can rest assured that the Democrats will point to articles like this one in an attempt to claim that it didn’t happen.

Margin Of Fraud

Democrats Margin Of Fraud 31 Comments

Testimony from the disbarment hearing for Jeffrey Clark;

Mark Wingate, a Fulton County Elections Board member, testifies that he voted against certifying the 2020 election because the county did not verify the signatures on 147,000 mail-in ballots.

“I asked what did we do for signature verification? And the comment I got back frankly floored me, ‘We didn’t do any.'”

Additionally, the county could not provide any chain of custody documentation or surveillance footage for mail-in ballots or ballot drop boxes.

“I and other board members had requested that we obtain the chain of custody documentation from the department and none of that was ever delivered.”

“There was never any surveillance tape, an inch of footage delivered to the board.”

When The Capitol Police Do It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal

Drain The Swamp Margin Of Fraud Trump 21 Comments

Is This Former ATF Agent Running the J6 Pipe Bomb Coverup?

It was [Ashan Benedict] who, with a straight face, attempted to explain away the behavior of the Capitol Police and Secret Service officers at the DNC pipe bomb site as being driven by a desire to not cause panic. There is simply no way that this is true or that Benedict believes it to be true. Prior to serving as Assistant Chief of Capitol Police, Benedict was the Executive Officer of the Metro PD in Washington, D.C., and before that, he served in the ATF as an agent for over 20 years, rising to the rank of Special Agent in Charge of the ATF for Washington, D.C. There is simply no way that someone of that background and pedigree could believe for a second that it is normal or acceptable for Secret Service agents or Capitol Police, upon being informed of a pipe bomb in close proximity, to stand around lackadaisically for minutes and allow schoolchildren to walk in front of the explosives. There is no way that someone with Benedict’s experience could think that such behavior could be explained by the authorities not wanting to cause panic.

The only reasonable conclusion from the DNC surveillance footage is that the authorities knew in advance or right away that the pipe bomb posed no threat—the only question is how they would know that. And the only reasonable conclusion from Benedict’s absurd explanation is that Benedict knows that they knew in advance that the pipe bomb posed no threat and is covering up this fact and the reasons behind it.

Incidentally, the FOIA’d ATF documents Judicial Watch obtained have at least one individual asking repeatedly whether the DNC and RNC pipe bombs were viable devices or not. […]

Benedict would then go on to sit back and nod approvingly as his subordinate (who was on the scene at DNC and partners with the man who discovered the bomb) offers an equally absurd non-answer as to how, after magically discovering the DNC bomb within 15 minutes of the first bomb’s discovery, he and his partner somehow didn’t think to look for a third bomb. The Capitol Police officer in question simply did not have an answer for this other than that he just somehow knew. For Benedict to nod in approval at such an answer is downright bizarre.

It’s long, grab a coffee.

Related Swampery News: Donald Trump’s $454 million bond has been reduced to $175 million thanks to a New York appeals court ruling. The ruling is a massive win for Trump, saving him from potential financial disaster. The new bond will stop Attorney General Letitia James from collecting the judgement during Trump’s appeal (NYT).

Margin Of Fraud

Democrats Margin Of Fraud 16 Comments

Chicago Shows How It Is Done.

Only about 20% of eligible voters voted, and it’s taking them at least six days past the election to count all the votes. Every single one of these people is responsible for making fraud easier. But, the State’s Attorney’s race was closer. Lo and behold after all the ballots were practically counted they ‘found’ another mail-in ballot dropbox full of 10,000 ballots that were not postmarked or dated. They are counting them now.

via

When The Democrats Do It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal

Democrats Margin Of Fraud The Deplorables 5 Comments

And by “Democrat”, we mean Liz Cheney.

House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.) announced this week that the House may refer members of the partisan January 6 Committee to the Department of Justice for alleged misconduct involving document concealment and destruction.

During his ongoing investigation into the January 6 Committee’s activities, Loudermilk revealed that the Committee had disposed of documents and records despite being warned by then-incoming Speaker of the House Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) to preserve all records. This news comes in the wake of a House report that found that the Democrat-led committee withheld exculpatory evidence about Trump from the public.

Missed It By THAT Much

CreepyJoeBiden Democrats Margin Of Fraud Trump 71 Comments

NBC;

The Supreme Court on Monday handed a sweeping win to former President Donald Trump by ruling states cannot kick him off the ballot over his actions leading up to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol — bringing a swift end to a case with huge implications for the 2024 election.

The court in an unsigned ruling with no dissents reversed the Colorado Supreme Court, which determined that Trump could not serve again as president under section 3 of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment.

The court said the Colorado Supreme Court had wrongly assumed that states can determine whether a presidential candidate is ineligible under a provision of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment.

The ruling makes it clear that Congress, not states, has to set rules on how the 14th Amendment provision can be enforced. As such the decision applies to all states, not just Colorado.

MSNBC hardest hit.

HAHAHAHA

Glenn Reynolds:The Supreme Court rules, many pundits are fools.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation