27 Replies to “Margin Of Fraud”

  1. I’d like to see them also do a count of how many mail in ballots were requested, versus returned, versus counted.

    Because In lancaster county, there was 108,539 requested, 89,681 returned, and 142,584 counted…

  2. I love watching how the filthy vile human sh*tstains called ‘liberals’ simultaneously are convinced that 2016 was stolen by Trump but 2020 was the Best-est Most Secur-est-est Election Evvvaaahhhh ….

    1. In 2016, Trump was able to easily overcome the “margin of fraud”
      In 2020, they used every trick in the book to insure that the “margin of fraud” was insurmountable.

      2024 looks to be the same.

      2. JD – they learned their lesson in 2016 when they didn’t cheat enough. Increasingly, I am beginning to believe Biden is in more danger than Trump. Joe doesn’t want to go and no one is going to believe he gets 100 million votes. I could, however be wrong because there is a lot of people who believe he got more than Obama.
        So they wack Joe and blame Trump and his supporters. You have already been told white right wing extremists are the biggest threat to the country. It doesn’t take much imagination to figure out what the narrative will be. Michelle steps in and saves the day. Two birds with one stone. Any guesses on the probability?

  3. The truth about the 2020 election fraud may be coming out in dribs and drabs, but it IS coming out.

    (Allan S. must be curled up in the fetal position and weeping profusely)

    There is no stopping it now, and I can only hope that the Republicans realize what needs to be done in response: actual consequences ARE required. Lawsuits, criminal charges, disbarments, loss of employment and pensions…whatever. The American public doesn’t want to hear any BS about “water under the bridge” or “there’s no point in pursuing it at this time”. There must be justice, and there must be SEEN to be justice. Same with the ridiculous weaponization of the DOJ against one (and only one) political candidate in a desperate effort to prevent him from winning the Presidency again. Even the Democrats should be supporting this, because frankly, if you can do it to them then they can also turn around and do it to you.

    1. Fred ” and I can only hope that the Republicans realize what needs to be done in response: ”
      Where u been hiding mate. Most of the establishment Republicans are in on it. Hell, McConnel even gave money to Democrat candidates opposingMAGA candidates

      1. “Fred ” and I can only hope that the Republicans realize what needs to be done in response: ”
        Where u been hiding mate. Most of the establishment Republicans are in on it. Hell, McConnel even gave money to Democrat candidates opposingMAGA candidates”

        Oh, I’m aware. I just hope they realize that their entire future as politicians rests on the re-election of Donald Trump, and they (the “never-Trump” minority) can swallow their pride and act accordingly.

  4. In voting, you should have to show up in person and vote once. The votes should be tallied in real time so that as voting ends the results are immediately known. All votes cast are made public. The voter and his/her/their vote choices. No pre-election voting.

    Or you could just set up huge yellow boxes on busy street corners weeks before the election and rely on volunteers to collect individual ballots and deposit them into a tally box and the tally box emptied at the yellow boxes. The yellow boxes may not be emptied for several weeks after the election (depends on who is winning). But it would be fair in the sense that everyone would have an easy chance to vote. Wait, we already have that.

    1. Agree except for the early voting days. There are a lot of good people that are necessarily not in their riding on election day. Extreme vetting of voters and lists required, including picture ID.

      1. I’m not convinced that would be worse than what we have now. The NDP, in particular, has a long history of encouraging students to vote at their universities on early voting days and again at their parents’ home riding on the actual voting day.

      2. “Agree except for the early voting days. There are a lot of good people that are necessarily not in their riding on election day.”

        I would say the same. People who are out of the country, for example. But aside from them…vote in person or don’t vote at all.

          1. I totally agree with VOWG Photo identification —–plus residence checked and must vote in your riding! If you are out of your riding a sworn affidavit signed! I have a bad feeling Trudeau and Singh are trying to cook this election!

            Last Us election was a fraud in at least 4 states–Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, and New Mexico—giving Biden the win!
            NBC News a “Third of Americans believe the 2020 election result was fraudulent”

  5. Election Fraud should be treated as high treason, with punishments up to and including death.

    Fair, legal, and orderly elections are essential in democratically representative republics. They are the primary reason that leadership can be selected without significant bloodshed. If these shenanigans continue, we’ll find ourselves turning back to the old tried and true methods.

  6. Getting the RIGHT result is so important in professional sport that we have had INSTANT REPLAY in the NFL for decades … and VAR in professional soccer for years … and electronic balls and strikes are coming to MLB next season (if I recall correctly). But the MOST important part of our entire Nations and Culture … our “Democracy” … vote count … is a worse mess now than it was 50 years ago.

  7. Now do Canada, where we have an unelected electoral czar who lets you know who won.

  8. You will often see leftists and the media (but I repeat myself) use the phrase “no wide spread voter fraud”….but of course you don’t NEED “wide spread” voter fraud. Only voter fraud in a few States to turn the election. There is no question there was significant fraud in the last U.S. election….there will be more this time.

  9. Where is the actual data here? I notice they’re making two mistakes regarding Georgia law. Ballot images aren’t required by law, for one.

    Much like the lawsuits, big proclamations but zero substance.

    1. “Where is the actual data here? ”

      Where is what data? READ THE REPORT. Much of the data in question (and the explanations as to the problems found) is explained there. The data that is *missing* is what makes the whole thing even more suspect.

      “I notice they’re making two mistakes regarding Georgia law. Ballot images aren’t required by law, for one.”

      Nor did ANYONE say that they WERE ‘required’. Nice straw man.

      And what is the second ‘mistake’ that the professionals somehow missed but the World’s Smartest Truck Driver caught?

      “Much like the lawsuits, big proclamations but zero substance.”

      You mean the very few lawsuits that were actually allowed to be heard (but only when subject to evidence and time restrictions)? Or the majority of them where the courts were too cowardly (or corrupt) to even look at them?

      Keep whining. You LOST, and different groups are now proving it all over the country.

    1. Great link. The opening statement:

      “Since the election, their claims have been softened from “there is no evidence of election fraud” to “there is no widespread evidence of election fraud” to “there is no widespread evidence of election fraud that could alter the presidential race results”.”

      I’m sure Allan S. will now go through the summary *point by point* and deliver his scathing rebuttal.

  11. We need election fraud investigation here in canuckistan. We have chinese interference and how many votes are from new immigrants that are not qualified in swing ridings in the 905 belt and elsewhere. And to top it off, elections canuckistan works directly for the regime. The turds mandate is as fake as bidens

    1. “We need election fraud investigation here in canuckistan.”

      At least we only have to deal with one entity here (Elections Canada)…and our system provides for election scrutineers from *all* official political parties to be present during the counting…there is no taping of pizza boxes over the windows to obstruct views or letting people go to the washroom then not allowing them back in because they are ‘over capacity’. It would be very difficult for any large-scale fraud to be perpetrated here.

  12. From Arizona:

    ________________________________

    In a unanimous ruling, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the Maricopa County Superior Court and Arizona Court of Appeals wrongfully sanctioned the Arizona Republican party in awarding attorney fees against them over a lawsuit challenging Maricopa County’s post-election hand-count audit procedures.

    “We hold that the attorney fees award was improper because Petitioners’ claim was not groundless, thus obviating any need to determine whether the claim was made in the absence of good faith,” Justice John Lopez writes in the court’s opinion.

    __________________________________

    The corruption runs deep in Maricopa County, but justice (and the truth) will inevitably prevail.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation