Unconfirmed Sources: Hillary has locked herself in a bathroom and won’t come out.

The newly released financial files on Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton’s growing fortune omit a company with no apparent employees or assets that the former president has legally used to provide consulting and other services, but which demonstrates the complexity of the family’s finances. […]
The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to provide private details of the former president’s finances on the record, said the entity was a “pass-through” company designed to channel payments to the former president.

Via Drudge.

Clinton Foundation Failed to Disclose 1,100 Foreign Donations

On Saturday, responding to the Times story, Maura Pally, the acting CEO of the Clinton Foundation, issued a statement echoing this assertion: “This is hardly an effort on our part to avoid transparency-unlike in the U.S., under Canadian law, all charities are prohibited from disclosing individual donors without prior permission from each donor.”
Canadian tax and privacy law experts were dubious of this claim. Len Farber, former director of tax policy at Canada’s Department of Finance, said he wasn’t aware of any tax laws that would prevent the charity from releasing its donors’ names. “There’s nothing that would preclude them from releasing the names of donors,” he said. “It’s entirely up to them.”
[…]
While Giustra says he can’t reveal any names, he is willing to disclose that [Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (CGEP)–a Canadian affiliate of the Clinton Foundation] money comes from “mostly Canadian donors.” The charity is registered in Canada, he says, not to hide the identity of its donors but to enable them to receive Canadian tax breaks that can reimburse them for nearly half of what they give.
However, not all CGEP’s big donors are Canadian. The Canada Revenue Agency–Canada’s IRS–requires charities to reveal whether they receive donations of more than $10,000 (Canadian) from people who are not Canadians, employed in the country, or carrying on business there. In both 2009 and 2010, CGEP filings show that it reported receiving such donations to Canadian authorities.

Via Drudge

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

Probably nothing.

Now is the time at SDA when we juxtapose!
April 13th, 2015: Hillary Clinton, under pressure from the left wing of her Democratic Party to aggressively campaign against income inequality, voiced concern about the hefty paychecks of some corporate executives in an email to supporters
April 11th, 2015: Chelsea Clinton in a Gucci dress, Mateo New York bracelet, Cartier bracelet, Garland Collection ring, Halleh ring.

RNC Chair Priebus: Clinton Scrubbing Email Server May Be ‘Criminal’
Which part? Having and using it? Not acknowledging it until caught? Not submitting the emails to the State Dept. or Congress? Deleting or wiping them after the subpoena?

“The firm sought to undermine our justice system by destroying evidence,” said Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson at an afternoon news conference, saying the firm has intentionally disposed of “tons” of evidence after a government inquiry began last October.
He added: “At the time, Andersen knew full well that these documents were relevant.”
The Bash*? Oh, that’s easy, $> ^Andersen^Clinton