53 Replies to “Cold, Canuck Hands”

  1. The biggest problem with all of our laws…
    So many people have exemptions which is imposed on the rest of us.
    These laws, restrictions and regulations are cumulative in always growing.
    I have yet to see any cancelled. Just certain people are above these laws and are exempt from prosecution.

  3. “These weapons were designed for one purpose and one purpose only to kill the largest number of people in the shortest amount of time. ”

    – They pale in comparison with nukes. Just sayin’…

    I like one of the comments in the twitter thread: “That guy over there took my crayons. All my colours!” He only knows one colour – red, it colours his philosophy and his budget.

  4. Hunting for anything including people with an AR15 is already illegal in Canada, so cabin boy is referring to criminals only.
    The objective here is to fool the largest number of people in the shortest period of time for as long as possible.
    The biggest problem is people listen to that ignorant nonsense, people in cities who should be made to kill what they eat.
    Let them all be made to work at the collective for free one month a year to give them their very own taste of totalitarianism.

      1. Hm.I didn’t know that. The AR-10 would be a great deer rifle! The ’15 is strictly a varmint rifle imo.

        1. You can take a deer with a .223, it depends upon the ammo you use.
          If you are packing it in over hill and dale, the lightness of an AR15 really shines.

  5. Why do fish cops need to kill large numbers of people in a short amount of time?

    Asking for Trudeau.

    Comments are priceless. Wayne Butt lecturing about ar15s too small for ethical shots (ar10 is what the article is about =308win), and stating that ar15s are full auto in USA (they are not).

    2. I don’t believe there is ANY subject on which there is SO much ignorance by the media and politicians as firearms. Allah almighty,you’d think we were talking about the far side of Saturn not an everyday item readily available complete with training and instruction.

  7. Some dispute over who originally said it but still, “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.”

  8. The biggest problem we have is the fact we’ve elected communists.
    That’s why they want your guns!
    There not worried about the criminals, for they are the criminals, their worried about us!
    Better for them if we’re disarmed.
    Fm.

    And the msm are bought off gutless bastards and so are the rcmp.
    How is it that s n c lavalin or the we s candle and nothing- why?
    Gutless crooked bastards that’s why!

    1. “fact we’ve elected communists”

      And by “we” you don’t mean the people of Alberta or Saskatchewan, eh?
      Just so you know, we Albertans and Saskies didn’t elect the communists.

      1. You Albertans elected Nenshi, Iveson and Notley. And Kenney, how’s that working out for you?

      3. So I guess nobody gives a shit about the fact that the thread is about Federal Gun Laws by Federally elected politicians and NOT about provincial or civic politicians.
        And can any of you NOBODIES name the Alberta provincial or civic Conservative politicians which had run against these Alberta provincial or Alberta civic commies? No?! So how is it that Albertans had a choice then?

        Because it does matter that No actual conservatives were in those races for Albertans to vote for.
        Not to you maybe, but to reality.

    2. “we Albertans and Saskies didn’t elect the communists”

      Rachel Notley was from the Communist Party of Alberta.

      Contrast that with Olivia Ceaucescu from the Communist Party of Ontario who was easily defeated by last minute entrant Douglas Ford.

      (To become the mayor of 416 one has to be either a conservative e.g. Rob Ford, or pretend to be one, like John Tory.)

      1. “Rachel Notley was from the Communist Party of Alberta.”

        Yes and people like bartinsky voted for the Alberta Progressives, splitting the right wing vote and electing Rachel Notley.
        Combined, the right wing vote would have beaten Notley. Of course you already knew that, you pedophile worshipping
        Death Cultist.

  10. Its the VOTERS that are to blame for the useless Commies we have in Ottawa. Voting for O’Toole -the fool- wont help either. He already likes the Paris Accord.
    Where is our Trump? Wouldnt matter even if we had one! Majority if Canadians too stupid to vote for him anyway,
    This country is beyond done!

  11. Its the VOTERS that are to blame for the useless Commies we have in Ottawa. Voting for O’Toole -the fool- wont help either. He already likes the Paris Accord.
    Where is our Trump? Wouldnt matter even if we had one! Majority of Canadians too stupid to vote for him anyway,
    This country is beyond done!

    1. “Voting for O’Toole -the fool- wont help either. He already likes the Paris Accord.”

      And Stephen Harper pretended to ‘like’ the Kyoto Accord.
      So after 9 years in power, exactly how much of the Kyoto Accord did Stephen Harper implement? Anyone, anyone? Bueller?
      I rest my case.(by the way, I don’t recommend voting CPC or Federally for any Albertan)
      It’s WEXIT all the way now. Vote provincially, vote against the traitor Jason Kenney.

      2. Butt Ooz, harpo did give away the right to 10% of any and all of your bank deposits , if the bank feels they need it. Harpo was/ is not a real conservative, nor are you!

  12. L- Justin Trudeau has identified the purpose for the firearm.
    The Maoist principle that “power comes out of the barrel of a gun”, of absolute state power.
    (Tienamen Square 1989, 10,000 slaughtered)

    Neither AR-15s, nor AR-10s are best suited to face down a charging grizzly or moose.

    Ironically, it is the gov’t. monopoly in Health Care, leads the final justification for arbitrary power.
    The latest policing “peace officer” priorities are the unmasked (criminal) citizen, who might exercise their Right to Freedom of Assembly, Religion or Free Expression, who dare to question or refuse to bow to the “Reset”.

    Meanwhile, drug dealers with customers subsidized by the state and state run “safe” injection sites, these are the “entrepreneurs” subsidized, whose growth is protected by the state.
    (The C.C.P. gets a cut of the imported fentanyl trade.)

    The General Secretary of the Liberal Party has spoken from the heart.
    Marxist medicine directs the agents of the state against the unmasked.
    Logos is the target. The end goal absolute power.

    “Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely ! – Lord Acton

  13. “These weapons were designed for one purpose and one purpose only to kill the largest number of people in the shortest amount of time. ”

    You can be sure that the idiot just forgot to mention “in the hands of government agents” or maybe he was not told the whole story by his handlers, since he would not know his ass from a hole in the ground, as the saying goes.

  14. “These weapons were designed for one purpose and one purpose only”

    And that purpose was to demonstrate that firearms could make use of the new techniques and materials that the Aerospace industry was currently exploiting in the ’50s. That’s why the designers, Eugene Stoner and Jim Sullivan, were former aircraft engineers.
    At the time that Armalite first designed the AR10 and AR15, that firearms company had ZERO military and LEO contracts.

  15. I beg to differ. The main purpose for our betters to be armed with AR-10s is that Pretty Prince Sock Boi gets a more intense orgasm when I service him with a gun pointed to my head.

    1. Be quiet peon, you know nothing how I service the illustrious PM. Yes, I service him on my knees, but I don’t face him. Ha? Take that. Typical wingnut disinformation.

  16. Not unusual. Every couple months a tender for AR variants is posted on SaskTenders. Usually MOT and the like. Latest one I saw was for Ministry of the Environment.

  17. Hope the CCFR calls the Yukon fish cops as witnesses that the AR platform is useful for other than killing lots of people in short amount of time. Ha.

  18. Thanks to Oz, pointing out above, (Nov 29 at 4.45 pm) the true history of the AR family. I am well trained and have over thirty years of firearms use and experience, and twenty years teaching the only part of C68 any of us ever agreed with, the Firearms Safety Training course PAL and RPAL. I stand to lose, meaning, “have confiscated, two AR 15’s and one Bushmaster AR 10 type”, plus seven other firearms euphemistically unsuitable for use in Canada. Funny how they’ve been suitable for the past fifty years, but now suddenly they’re not!

    The RCMP are issued with “patrol carbines” Colt AR 15 type .223 Rem, and now the “environment” officers in the Yukon are getting the AR 10 equivalent, in .308 Win. What about other Yukoners safety? With training, for that matter, what about the rest of trained and qualified RPAL Canadians safety? really it’s one rule for thee, and none for me. I am also aware of an ongoing wolf cull using Kel Tek .308 Win, bull-pup configuration, shooting them from helicopter’s! Using the “Safely trained” excuse is a crock, to cover their bullshit. Resist, resist, resist. It would tie up the ERT teams, and the courts for forty years if we worked collectively. Don’t blame the majority of the rank and file, what ever the ministry, blame the collusion of the upper brass with the Liberals. Also, as Bygeorge said above, (Nov 29 at 3.48 pm) they don’t care about criminals having guns, they fear us having guns, they consider us the threat to them, not the criminals. Man this shit frosts my socks!

  19. The Saskatchewan wood pussies went for the AR10 a year or two ago.

    It seems to be a pattern. In Alberta once the wood pussies became part of the Solicitor Generals force they began to upgrade their weaponry. Here in AB they are now responding to anything and everything just like the rcmp. No longer just patrolling the back roads looking for game violators.

    I guess it really doesn’t matter much. They have very little to do with conservation anyway.

    1. “They have very little to do with conservation anyway”
      Try reporting to them about some jack-lighting(illegal night hunting) of game you’ve witnessed in your area and see how far you get.
      They do have an important task in rural Sask now; they are in charge of policing illegal burning in your burn barrel. It is against environmental regulation to burn any household wastes that contain plastics and our conservation officers are in charge of policing that regulation.

      1. nold

        Exactly.

        Maybe now that the wood pussies have to respond to traffic accidents and every domestic call we can get some value for money.

        Governments have come to realize they add no value to conservation.

      2. We owned a business. Called the RCMP about once a year. The investigation ended when the cop walked out the door. Yet they show up in droves in Steinbach, Manitoba to browbeat Christians and give them tickets for going to church. They are useless pigs. They used to be respected in Western Canada. Now they are reviled.

  20. I notice in a sidebar at the link of a promotion to the Supreme Court and a new Chief Justice. What is this, I thought?? I never heard anything about this. Reading further, I find these are matters about the new appointments to the “Supreme Court of Yukon”.

    Supreme Court of Yukon!!
    Yukon.
    Population 42,000! One city – Whitehorse: population about 37,000. Otherwise the Yukon is empty.
    But wait – there`s more! They have a Premier, a Cabinet and a civil service.
    They also have a Mayor, a City Council and city employees.
    Who said that Liberals don`t have a sense of humour.

  23. On the other hand, conservation officers might have been more competent at taking out Gabriel Wortman.

  24. Rusty, we did not elect that hair flipping skank, she got in by the fact that the soreass funded Betty Boop of qr split the vote. We did not vote that moron in!

  25. How much?
    Is there a number given anywhere as to how much our fearless overload is paying per firearm?
    I trust is might be a bit less than the $30,500/weapon our “highly competent helpers spent on new sniper rifles for the military.
    I am checking cause Justine intends to
    “Buy Back” from me a Norinco knock off of the M14,chambered in 7.62 x 39..
    Now ,by Order of Council,this tool cannot now be bought/sold or traded..making it without price,there fore priceless.
    Now I am a reasonable man,if the Armed forces,with their large scale purchasing abilities,spends $30,500 each on 200 bolt action rifles,I would be very happy to sell a semi automatic to the government for such a fee.
    Although I do wonder,how do you “Buy back” something you never sold?
    Or is the Government running guns to Canadian Tire,behind the scenes?

    1. “Although I do wonder, how do you “Buy back” something you never sold?”

      Ah well, the communist world view holds that they own everything. Capisce?
      Therefore they have let you temporarily hold onto a piece of property, time now to “buy it back”, eh?
      This is literally the way that they view things.

    2. The federal government spent $5,000 each buying $1,000 retail Sako rifles for the fat Indians pretending to be soldiers called Canadian Rangers. Military procurement is a science unto itself.

  26. “These weapons were designed for one purpose and one purpose only to kill the largest number of people in the shortest amount of time. ”
    That’s why I have two.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation