26 Replies to “Your Moral And Intellectual Superiors”
Makes one wonder what constitutes a “journalism” college degree.
An IQ below that of a garden slug.
I believe they learned all they needed to know about American History from the 1619 Project … and dozens of Hollywood HATES America History movies … and mangled anti-American History from The (so-called) History Channel.
Are these people even Americans?
Have they not read the Declaration of Independence?
Am I missing something?
They HATE Christ and Christians … they HATE God … they worship Gaia and the spirituality of indigenous peoples. And Satan … they like him too.
Off topic, but in the history of all time self awareness fails, we have the Ministry of Public Safety- https://x.com/Safety_Canada/status/2056752169609519253
The ministry responsible for Nord VPN and others including Apple threatening to leave Canada is recommending you use a VPN for internet safety.
L – The Anglosphere countries are founded on the principles of British Common-Law. Which is founded under the concepts of Rights, not privileges. The concept of Rights are inalienable by man, whether monarch or dictator, President or Prime Minister, because they derive from the Judeo-Christian God of the Bible. The sacredness of the individual is due to being created in the image of God. The Right to Life is sacred and even Biblical Kings were obligated to serve the people, not themselves, and woe to those who failed in this moral duty. Upon which, their Royal Legal Authourity depended.
Liberty, which is freedom under moral law is Biblically derived. Hence, why the populist uprising that led to King John signing the Magna Carta was, firstly to recognize and honour the traditional liberties of the English people. It was not a heresy for the uprising against King John, as Monarch’s are not absolute monarchs. They, the Prime Minister and members of Parliament are all restrained by Natural Rights and Natural Justice. Their duty is to serve in recognition of Natural Rights and Natural Justice, not to serve their own interests or imagined Supremacy.
Electing Marxists, including Cult. Marxists and appointing Cult. Marxists to the Supreme Court is and has been problematic. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Preamble, “Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the Rule of Law:”
Everything that follows the grammatical use of a colon is to be interpreted by what precedes it !
The Rule of Law is a first in the Magna Carta, for it puts into explicit reference. The Rule of Law applies to the Crown and agents of the Crown, as it does to the aristocracy and the Commoner. It existed in Biblical inference before that.
Also, therefore the Rule of Law should apply to the judiciary, too. For their role is a humble one, to serve equal Justice before the law, to the wealthy and the poor, all are equal before Moses in his judicial role and so to those who serve in that role here.
The inclusion of group rights into the Charter is a Marxist principle, that and the hubris of judge made law, forty some years later is definitely a destabilizing force in Canada’s Confederation, today. To be continued…
Also, why to this day it is a religious ceremony and oath of office required, to be crowned a British Monarch; which post Henry the Eighth is required to be a loyal practicing Protestant. Who becomes the Protector of the Faith, the Anglican Church of Britain. Charles Rex lll is a monarch of some controversy in this regard.
I believe your King has declared himself a Ba’hai … as he embraces all religions and their unique ways to worship a god … or many gods … with many arms … or many underage girls.
Just as I figured ,a thread of nothing butt bible pounding BULLSHIT, you dimwitts are aware that the bible was modified by the RCC to further their communist political agenda,and to destroy their competition,Judaism and Orthodox Christians ?
Maybe one of you fools can produce some falsifiable proof of yer gods existence!!!!
Rights are granted and protected by the state.
You’re a c*nt and you will die one.
It has ZERO to do with the Bible, Shit-for-brains.
hmmmm. funny thing, l dont remember anywhere claims the RCC existed at the same time as any of the ancient manuscripts found in modern times and the source of scripture.
are RCCs also time travellers?
A pounding is what your boyfriends give you … I read, and study the Word of God. Gently opening the pages and often making notes in the margin.
Or so you say. But then why would anyone be moved by your opinion? It’s not like you know what you are talking about of course.
No….I keep an open mind. And I put value in the opinions of those who might really have a clue….which leaves you out.
For example, I would take the opinion of French physicist and philosopher of science Bernard d’Espagnat for his “studies into the concept of reality”. D’Espagnat, was a professor emeritus of theoretical physics at the University of Paris-Sud, and is known for his work on quantum mechanics.
D’Espagnat had an impressive scientific pedigree, having worked with Nobel laureates Louis de Broglie, Enrico Fermi and Niels Bohr. De Broglie was his thesis advisor; he served as a research assistant to Fermi; and he worked at CERN when it was still in Copenhagen under the direction of Bohr. He also served as a visiting professor at the University of Texas, Austin, at the invitation of the legendary physicist John Wheeler.
He worked on experimental tests of Bell’s theorem which states that either quantum mechanics is a complete description of the world or that if there is some reality beneath quantum mechanics, it must be nonlocal – that is, things can influence one another instantaneously regardless of how much space stretches between them, violating Einstein’s insistence that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.
Now this is what he has said about your question….. “There must exist, beyond mere appearances … a ‘veiled reality’ that science does not describe but only glimpses uncertainly. In turn, contrary to those who claim that matter is the only reality, the possibility that other means, including spirituality, may also provide a window on ultimate reality cannot be ruled out, even by cogent scientific arguments.”
Now, big mouth….tell us what your credentials are. And I leave it up to you to prove D’Espagnat wrong.
Thanks for that, much appreciated.
Many highly learned men have arrived at the same conclusion.
Chris Matthews telling Keith Olbermann he felt a thrill go up his leg listening to an Obama speech is still the #1 MSNBC clip in my books.
O’Donnell is truly unhinged. I can’t find a video clip but back in 2005 (I think), he was a guest on Dennis Miller’s show, part of “The Varsity” segment. The late columnist and blogger Cathy Seipp was a co-panelist and O’Donnell couldn’t even debate her civilly. He was apoplectic and I thought he was going to assault Cathy right there on the set. She was so calm and cool and I think that enraged him more. He hasn’t changed a bit.
The way it appears to be is, these characters don’t really care where your rights are from, the point is that you have no rights, only those, if any, that they for some reason want to give you.
The arrogance of those people could be patented. Their names should be on all the lampstands in the country, pointing to their arrogance and be banished from the civil society… one would think that Cuba, for now, would suit their totalitarian mind. Better yet N. Korea, that will show them. would have been interesting how long the idiots would survive with their ideology.
Trudeau poisoned the Constitution by adding group and positive rights which can only exist as an infringement of natural rights. The SCOC uses such to invent rights and entitlements and dispense them like candy.
“It’s not an endlessly expanding list of rights – the ‘right’ to health care, the ‘right’ to food and housing. That’s not freedom, that’s dependency. Those aren’t rights, those are the rations of slavery – hay and a barn for human cattle.” – P.J. O’Rourke
In my experience in Canada the bulk of people believe the only rights you have are those allowed by the government and those who support them- which of course makes them not rights at all. They also believe group rights override individual rights. Most of my American friends believe their rights are inhalable and God given and are prepared to fight for them.
I suspect a lot of smokers believe in inhalable rights…
and dont fergit, the MS part of ‘MSnbc’?
ya. billy boy’s outfit. oddly enough despite holding onto the initials, billy’s outfit
owns none of the broadcaster
would anything change if he had a charlie kirk moment?
no shortage of conspiiiidacy theories about him.
Makes one wonder what constitutes a “journalism” college degree.
An IQ below that of a garden slug.
I believe they learned all they needed to know about American History from the 1619 Project … and dozens of Hollywood HATES America History movies … and mangled anti-American History from The (so-called) History Channel.
Are these people even Americans?
Have they not read the Declaration of Independence?
Am I missing something?
They HATE Christ and Christians … they HATE God … they worship Gaia and the spirituality of indigenous peoples. And Satan … they like him too.
Off topic, but in the history of all time self awareness fails, we have the Ministry of Public Safety-
https://x.com/Safety_Canada/status/2056752169609519253
The ministry responsible for Nord VPN and others including Apple threatening to leave Canada is recommending you use a VPN for internet safety.
L – The Anglosphere countries are founded on the principles of British Common-Law. Which is founded under the concepts of Rights, not privileges. The concept of Rights are inalienable by man, whether monarch or dictator, President or Prime Minister, because they derive from the Judeo-Christian God of the Bible. The sacredness of the individual is due to being created in the image of God. The Right to Life is sacred and even Biblical Kings were obligated to serve the people, not themselves, and woe to those who failed in this moral duty. Upon which, their Royal Legal Authourity depended.
Liberty, which is freedom under moral law is Biblically derived. Hence, why the populist uprising that led to King John signing the Magna Carta was, firstly to recognize and honour the traditional liberties of the English people. It was not a heresy for the uprising against King John, as Monarch’s are not absolute monarchs. They, the Prime Minister and members of Parliament are all restrained by Natural Rights and Natural Justice. Their duty is to serve in recognition of Natural Rights and Natural Justice, not to serve their own interests or imagined Supremacy.
Electing Marxists, including Cult. Marxists and appointing Cult. Marxists to the Supreme Court is and has been problematic. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Preamble, “Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the Rule of Law:”
Everything that follows the grammatical use of a colon is to be interpreted by what precedes it !
The Rule of Law is a first in the Magna Carta, for it puts into explicit reference. The Rule of Law applies to the Crown and agents of the Crown, as it does to the aristocracy and the Commoner. It existed in Biblical inference before that.
Also, therefore the Rule of Law should apply to the judiciary, too. For their role is a humble one, to serve equal Justice before the law, to the wealthy and the poor, all are equal before Moses in his judicial role and so to those who serve in that role here.
The inclusion of group rights into the Charter is a Marxist principle, that and the hubris of judge made law, forty some years later is definitely a destabilizing force in Canada’s Confederation, today. To be continued…
Also, why to this day it is a religious ceremony and oath of office required, to be crowned a British Monarch; which post Henry the Eighth is required to be a loyal practicing Protestant. Who becomes the Protector of the Faith, the Anglican Church of Britain. Charles Rex lll is a monarch of some controversy in this regard.
I believe your King has declared himself a Ba’hai … as he embraces all religions and their unique ways to worship a god … or many gods … with many arms … or many underage girls.
Just as I figured ,a thread of nothing butt bible pounding BULLSHIT, you dimwitts are aware that the bible was modified by the RCC to further their communist political agenda,and to destroy their competition,Judaism and Orthodox Christians ?
Maybe one of you fools can produce some falsifiable proof of yer gods existence!!!!
Rights are granted and protected by the state.
You’re a c*nt and you will die one.
It has ZERO to do with the Bible, Shit-for-brains.
hmmmm. funny thing, l dont remember anywhere claims the RCC existed at the same time as any of the ancient manuscripts found in modern times and the source of scripture.
are RCCs also time travellers?
A pounding is what your boyfriends give you … I read, and study the Word of God. Gently opening the pages and often making notes in the margin.
Or so you say. But then why would anyone be moved by your opinion? It’s not like you know what you are talking about of course.
No….I keep an open mind. And I put value in the opinions of those who might really have a clue….which leaves you out.
For example, I would take the opinion of French physicist and philosopher of science Bernard d’Espagnat for his “studies into the concept of reality”. D’Espagnat, was a professor emeritus of theoretical physics at the University of Paris-Sud, and is known for his work on quantum mechanics.
D’Espagnat had an impressive scientific pedigree, having worked with Nobel laureates Louis de Broglie, Enrico Fermi and Niels Bohr. De Broglie was his thesis advisor; he served as a research assistant to Fermi; and he worked at CERN when it was still in Copenhagen under the direction of Bohr. He also served as a visiting professor at the University of Texas, Austin, at the invitation of the legendary physicist John Wheeler.
He worked on experimental tests of Bell’s theorem which states that either quantum mechanics is a complete description of the world or that if there is some reality beneath quantum mechanics, it must be nonlocal – that is, things can influence one another instantaneously regardless of how much space stretches between them, violating Einstein’s insistence that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.
Now this is what he has said about your question….. “There must exist, beyond mere appearances … a ‘veiled reality’ that science does not describe but only glimpses uncertainly. In turn, contrary to those who claim that matter is the only reality, the possibility that other means, including spirituality, may also provide a window on ultimate reality cannot be ruled out, even by cogent scientific arguments.”
Now, big mouth….tell us what your credentials are. And I leave it up to you to prove D’Espagnat wrong.
Thanks for that, much appreciated.
Many highly learned men have arrived at the same conclusion.
Chris Matthews telling Keith Olbermann he felt a thrill go up his leg listening to an Obama speech is still the #1 MSNBC clip in my books.
Lawrence O’Donnel’s ‘Stop the hammering’ is classic, too. https://youtu.be/WE0ALNzBqDc?
O’Donnell is truly unhinged. I can’t find a video clip but back in 2005 (I think), he was a guest on Dennis Miller’s show, part of “The Varsity” segment. The late columnist and blogger Cathy Seipp was a co-panelist and O’Donnell couldn’t even debate her civilly. He was apoplectic and I thought he was going to assault Cathy right there on the set. She was so calm and cool and I think that enraged him more. He hasn’t changed a bit.
It’s hard to beat (sorry) … this one …
https://nypost.com/2023/05/04/jeffrey-toobin-addresses-zoom-call-masturbation-scandal/
The way it appears to be is, these characters don’t really care where your rights are from, the point is that you have no rights, only those, if any, that they for some reason want to give you.
The arrogance of those people could be patented. Their names should be on all the lampstands in the country, pointing to their arrogance and be banished from the civil society… one would think that Cuba, for now, would suit their totalitarian mind. Better yet N. Korea, that will show them. would have been interesting how long the idiots would survive with their ideology.
Trudeau poisoned the Constitution by adding group and positive rights which can only exist as an infringement of natural rights. The SCOC uses such to invent rights and entitlements and dispense them like candy.
“It’s not an endlessly expanding list of rights – the ‘right’ to health care, the ‘right’ to food and housing. That’s not freedom, that’s dependency. Those aren’t rights, those are the rations of slavery – hay and a barn for human cattle.” – P.J. O’Rourke
In my experience in Canada the bulk of people believe the only rights you have are those allowed by the government and those who support them- which of course makes them not rights at all. They also believe group rights override individual rights. Most of my American friends believe their rights are inhalable and God given and are prepared to fight for them.
I suspect a lot of smokers believe in inhalable rights…
and dont fergit, the MS part of ‘MSnbc’?
ya. billy boy’s outfit. oddly enough despite holding onto the initials, billy’s outfit
owns none of the broadcaster
would anything change if he had a charlie kirk moment?
no shortage of conspiiiidacy theories about him.
Satan’s minions calling out Captain Obvious
That people this ignorant are allowed on television is incredibly alarming.