Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
I guess we know why CBC and the rest of the corrupt MSM turds are avoiding this Inquiry like the plague, they are directly implicated in the lies and crimes.
I wonder if the CBC will report this.
Ha!
I still don’t understand how the CBC exists. Upon its founding there was a specific purpose for it’s creation that was actually spelled out in the establishment. That purpose no longer exists. At the time there were about 50 media outlets in Canada (mostly radio, and some newspapers). It was established to give an alternative viewpoint and create a Canadian based media outlet separate from those.
Today, there are well over 1,000 media outlets in Canada (NOT counting Blogs and Blog casters). So the CBC’s purpose is now moot. ADDITIONALLY, the CBC has been active (overtly) in getting competing media outlets cancelled or removed which is even more egregious than their current existence on false pretenses. The best example was CBC being instrumental in removing the most popular Canadian YouTube show (“Real Talk Politiks”). Incidentally, RTP was more popular than the CBC at the time.
“That purpose no longer exists.” BINGO.
there has to be a dozen different avenues for television viewing.
we do NOT, any more, ‘need’ a ‘national public broadcaster’ costing > a billion ‘with a B’ dollars.
sell it sell it sell it.
l voted AGAINST stephen Harpooned for a number of reasons. if he had done at least THAT,
l wd not have voted as such, but he had to be ‘clever’ and follow ‘expediency’.
Doesn’t matter. Nobody will watch and nobody will believe or care to.
We all quote the sad television viewership but CBC is often the first story linked in any online news- they have a lot more influenence and credibility in many peoples minds than they should.
I disagree. The Ceeb has lost credibility across a big swathe of English-speaking Canada. And this is a positive development.
Et tu, King Moderna?
The CBC will just go at it even harder.
Ugly mewling quims and nutless wonders don’t back down, they double down.
You literally have to euthanize them.
?
“things youre *gonna* see on CBC” well, l got my doubts.
although if it does show up l still wont know as l dont watch ANY television *whatsoever*
I guess it depends on how the word “on” was intended to be used. Is it in the context of being “broadcast by” or in the context of “relating to”.
true, l was thinking in terms of broadcasting the inquiry.
or maybe it eludes to *alternative* run-of-the-mill CBC fare as opposed to the inquiry.
either way gawd help us. let me put it this way:
*the continued existence of CBC in its present form is the bellwether, the canary in the coal mine
as far as Liberal strategies including this STATE ie propaganda broadcaster*.
A wrecking ball should be taken to 250 Front St. W. in Toronto.
Dismantle the CBC, brick by brick.
Too slow. I want to see an earth-shattering kaboom.
Thanks for posting Mr. Palmer’s testimony on the CBC. He does a terrific job describing CBC News.
Rodney Palmer’s testimony is excellent. It’s not often that I’m not thinking to FFW a bit in the slower parts of testimony or an interview. That didn’t happen with this.
L – Rodney Palmer, via his testimony in the Allison Inquiry, just drove a wooden stake through the vampire that the C.B.C. has become. “How?” you ask. By being bitten by the vampire of Cult. Marxism. Unfortunately, that particular mind virus(to switch metaphors) has infected the rest of the MSM, via contaminated cash. They, too, have much to answer for.
The Allison Inquiry is proving, yet again, the purpose of free speech is so that bad/failed ideas get to die instead of people. No doubt, the Carney regime is looking for a way to charge witnesses with “hate speech”.
The Allison Inquiry is looking more and more like an inquiry into organized crime!
Someone please post the transcript of Rodney Palmer statements, soon.