19 Replies to “Mischief Is Important”

  2. yep. ‘come on down’ means sumbuddy in the group is going to win big time.
    dead AB SK, its called stockholm syndrome. look it up, see what youre letting happen as such
    DOING TO YOURSELF.
    bla bla bla bla downside this downside that. SO WHAT.
    thats all *temporary* do NOT get sucked in by the alarmists tricks
    its a generational thing, see it as such, act accordingly.
    and remember ITS HAPPENED BEFORE. successfully. imagine its a fait accompli, done deal.
    how would THAT feel?

  3. Until all the soft leftoids in your province are either culled or exported, you’ll be stuck in the Big Con, taking it in the arse.

    These people are Ultra Canadians – they want to suckle at the dry teat of the Mommy state while shovelling money to a bunch of frogs and parasites out east.
    Who ironically hate their fcking guts.

    Good luck, but you need ammo.
    Not advocating, just stating the fcking obvious.

  4. I remember the 1995 Quebec referendum. I, then, was very much against the idea of breaking the country apart, and I was living in Alberta at the time! Today: Alberta, LET IT RIP!!!

      1. A lot of us here in Ottawa, believe it or not, were as well.
        We’ve always referred to K-bec as the “Dark Side”.
        When you’re up close to the Privileged, bitching and whining like Obamas looking for slave reparations, it’s downright sickening.

      2. Hey JB,
        Maybe, maybe. I think the question is: “If Quebec had seceded in 1995, could the Liberal Party have been rendered politically irrelevant?” See, JuSHITIn Trudeau was a classmate of my wife in 1994, at McGill. By 1996, JuSHITin was already happily blackfacing in BC. QC or not, I think JuSHITIn had already been preselected for, uh, “greatness”. Hard call. But your point is noted!

      3. I remember all the questions and statements like: Quebec can’t leave until they pay for their share of the National debt. They have to cough up all the Defense Money, infrastructure and equipment. They will need their own money and passports. Some of the more gung-ho were having wet dreams of riding APCs to the Quebec legislature to set them straight. You’ll hear the same arguments going the other way. The most interesting development is the use of First nations and lawfare to pre-empt the legitimacy of a referendum.

      4. l was wrapping up my poli sci degree and expressed admiration for the strategy and guile they have invoked the entire time. l saw it as an exercise in ‘calling their bluff’ and advocated a RATIFICATION vote soon after. the Liberal c*nt in my riding pooh poohed the notion, Canaduh was a confirmed chickenshyt by then, l didnt ralize it.
        the proposal is if the ratification passes, troc is the first nation to recognize the new one. ah, but if it FAILS ie ‘sober second thoughts’ prevail then they are disallowed from trying the trick again for the nxt 40 years. well well, that seems to be the case anyway lol.
        a sol’n to the notion they can keep trying keep trying keep trying, only has to succeed ONCE.
        since those heady days l have concluded the entire exercise is a HOAX. a hollow threat to bust up this post national state translating into 100s billions in xfer payments (did you get that part AB?) but again, an obviously extremely successful HOAX tapping into the elbows up mentality. after all, ‘elbows up’ is reminiscent of a headless chicken dashing about with the FLIGHTLESS wings up in a panic . . . .

  5. Where’s sexually ambiguous Super”girl” when you need “them”? The Federalists need to trade their limp dikks for double mastectomies.

    I see someone in the Alberta independence movement went to school on Spencer Pratt messaging.

  6. Actually these guys look like they belong downtown Calgary. I’m sorry but the Albertan population aren’t a monoblock of Malboro men. When you’re the only white boy on Calgary public transit going back to your hotel flying the LGBTQ flag, you start having doubts that a referendum for separation will have enough votes. For the old timers, remember when the parti Quebecois lost the referendum? Drunk fat old Pariseau was whining about the ethnic vote. Maybe Alberta is about to find out. I do wish them luck, really.

    1. Amen to your statement about Alberta not being a homogenous block of rural Marlboro men.
      I still want to leave, but in our system the tyranny of democracy (ie – mob rule…..however many the MSM can convince to go with the Narrative de Jour) may well keep us locked in. Same Tyranny of mob rule that has kept Canada under liberal rule for most of her existence.
      I hope I am wrong…..but there are more votes in the cities than in rural Alberta.
      The split is not just East/West or Left/Right. It is Rural/Urban. And they have more votes than we do.
      Question – if some areas are vehemently opposed to staying in this failed confederation, why not split up Alberta? Let the areas that want to leave and form closer ties with the States do so – the Calgary to Edmonton corridor can stay if they wish. Just a thought. If the borders of Canada are no longer sacred, why should the borders of Alberta be?

      1. Ha. It sure wasn’t the Marlboro men who elected Nenshi and Gyoti (sp).
        Or up in Edmonchuk where they voted for 2 woke mayors.
        Wexit is a pipeline MOU dream.
        Ralph would be pissed, as am I.
        What does Preston M think?

Leave a Reply

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation