Coulda Had A Pipeline

Your second juxtapose of the day.

I want a new country.

12 Replies to “Coulda Had A Pipeline”

  1. Ohhhhhhhhhh mommmmaaaaaa … Trump is traversing the sacred lands of our most noble, peaceful, eco-responsible indigenous inhabitants of the … shared lands. The horror. The horror. Call out the War Parties! Paint your faces in War paint! Drive those settlers off the sacred lands.

    No Kings or something.
    No Billionaires or something

  2. Now we can sell our stuff to the US to resell at a profit to the rest of the world, while we can’t. We MUST have our own outlets to thye world, East, West and North.

      1. Plus a will do do so coupled with the removal of roadblocks. The latter may result in the former.

    1. No need for East, that would be for LNG, and the US is locked in as the supplier, roughly a 1.5 Trillion dollar deal, for which the Liberals saw no business case.

  3. Trump tried doing this in his first term, but Biden’s administration pulled the permit almost immediately. I think this is the Bridger Pipeline expansion project, if I’m not mistaken. He, obviously, learned that you don’t start a project like this late in your term or the autopen will show up a year later and sink it.

    The Bridger Pipeline will swoop down into Wyoming, I believe. What I find interesting is the dynamics of the Canadian side of this project. Alberta (as a province) is going to want this to go through smoothly. Ottawa is going to try and delay it beyond Trump’s presidential term by tying it up in the Courts. Alberta is going in invoke the same protocol that Saskatchewan just did on Coal Mining stating that the Province holds authority on their own energy resource decisions. And both sides are going to be deluged with environmental organization law suits.

  4. why such OBVIOUS resource management infrastructure STILL doesnt exist in Canaduh.
    sigh . . . . . ‘laurentian elite’ syndrome.
    sol’n: BUG OUT AB BUG OUT GET YER ASS OUTTA THIS F’ING POLITICAL TAR PIT (pun intended)

  5. I’m happy for Alberta but I am just a little worried about how much leverage the US will have over them. As has been mentioned by others before, gulf coast refineries can accept Venezuelan crude.

    1. A fair amount…there are deposits on our side of the border this line would service, so if Canada wants to “shut the spigot off!” or not play ball in any way, well, it really won’t be catastrophic.

    2. I’d rathe have a an entity have leverage that is pro energy, than Ottawa have the leverage, which is globalist, elitist, eurocentric malthusian evil.

  6. What? I hear the Canadian government is … studying … all manner of pipelines crisscrossing all your sacred indigenous lands. Jussssssst a few hundred million more Loonies ought to lubricate those tribal chiefs to allow their sacred lands to be forever besmirched. Or something. Studies. Consultants hired. Cash splashed. Canadian pipelines have the same prospects as a high speed [sic] CA train.

  7. POTUS: “… underground…as opposed to trucking or training it…” Exactly.

Navigation