46 Replies to “Cold Canuck Hands”

  1. Sure you don’t want to become the 51st state? Honestly the only downside would be for us Americans unless we can find a way to encourage idiot leftist Canadians and their fellow travellers to self-deport.

    1. I would 100% go for 51st state. My wife is an American and Canada is so screwed up we have applied for a greencard for me so we can escape Canada even though we are elderly. If the USA came to us I would be ecstatic. I wouldn’t have to move.

      1. I thought of that while I was typing. However, I am morally and ethically very much opposed (to put it lightly) to suicide, especially of the state assisted, sort.
        I’ll just take a push for repatriation back to their home countries/cultural-ethnic origins (yes, that means ol’ Blighty for the white ones too, back to the continent with them!). At gun point if necessary (for I’m not adverse to strong measures nor violence correctly applied).

        1. I’m averse to the misuse of adverse.
          I know, grammar snobs are tiresome and adversarial.
          Wink,

          1. One of the definitions of adverse is “hostile”. As such, the use of it in such a manner creates a rhetorical loop back to my hostility towards suicide (specifically state sponsored).

            When we learn the rules, we can break them for effect (just ask Faulkner). (wink)

          4. Ok Ok my bad.
            Sorry said the Greek chorus.
            PS….Still don’t care for Faulkner. More Vonnegut myself.
            So it goes.

          5. Interesting, seeing as how Vonnegut takes inspiration from Faulkner with his use of non-linear time and realistic but fictional locales.
            Faulkner is just an excellent example of somebody who does break the rules. I prefer Ambrose Bierce.

          6. Faulkner novels make perfect Christmas presents.

            All together now: “Yoknapatawpha County is a fine way… to say ‘Merry Christmas’ to you…”

    3. I don’t see Alberta or Saskatchewan having a higher ‘left-wing jerkoff’ population then say.. Pennsylvania or Georgia. They’re certainly nowhere near as bad as CA/OR/WA.. If anything, they would probably vote more like Idaho, or Montana.. maybe the Dakotas, I think it is entirely possible that they could get ‘redder’ over time, after they learn how to ‘express themselves’ within the U.S. federal courts and voting regimen.. They would be accomplished masters at staving off the eco-nazis and marxists within our nation, using the powers enumerated to them as states in our courts, considering how well they’ve managed to tread water in their ‘stacked deck’ system. the sierra club would shit themselves..

      1. You just made my argument. We’re full; no need to overflow the tank! But the rest? Ok, but you have to help clean up the leftist slime — that’s the deal. We’ll let you keep your leaf flag as a state symbol, but you must Americanize.
        Perhaps some rituals of acceptance…tearing down Tim Horton’s and erecting Buccee’s over the ashes, swearing off poutine for a month…some Waffle Houses…

        1. Plucky Albertans would make bad-assed WaffleHouse gladiators.. The speed and precision at wince they could send covfefe mugs, muffin plates, and assorted cutlery sailing against unruly drunks, feral urbanites, and drug-addled vagrants during any given 2am WaffleHouse ‘battle royale’ would be the stuff of legends, I assure you.. Speaking of which, does ‘Tim Horton’s’ even do nightly Battle Royales after the bars close? Because, if not.. what is the point behind them?

          1. I was speaking more to Waffle House’s glorious pecan waffles and first rate logistics, but ok.
            PS. the fights tend to happen around 3 a.m. and only at certain Waffle Houses.

  2. This gun confiscation is not about guns. It is about establishing a WEF “you will own nothing and be happy” situation for Canadians. The confiscation is the thin edge of the wedge for confiscation of any and all property any time the government decides it wants something gone. Next it will be your pick up trucks to stop climate change or some similar evil.

    If Canadians don’t resist the gun confiscation more and more confiscations will follow.

    1. That’s pretty much the commie playbook; also the one for military dictatorships.

      Eventually you will be forced to share your homes with strangers to alleviate the housing crisis. and be issued food ration cards.

    2. and note the confiscation by proxy going on with these land claims.
      with the stamp of approval from SCOC. making all ‘legal like the sheep go for that’.
      what a sickeningly disgusting collection of full tilt COWARDS they (not l exclude myself) have become
      deserving of every inch metaphocically rammed up their arse.
      every time.

    3. So, this outcome just reinforces the will of both sides.
      The Liberals still view gun owners as incorrigible rednecks who will never co-operate unless the
      POWER of the state is enforced, with prejudice.
      Gun owners, rightfully, view the LibLefties as authoritarian control freaks, out of touch with the real world, scapegoating/villainizing lawful citizens, while turning a blind eye to the browns and their violent, gun toting criminal enterprises.
      Do not expect the Liberals to walk away. Their nefarious control freak nature will erupt in a new push for guns. At some point, if they get that YUGE majority (that we are all skeptical of anyways), they will go door to door tearing your home apart to find that 22 you use to put gophers down with.
      Never Trust a (spit) Liberal.

  3. “Soo.. yeah, we were thinking that we would spend a bunch of your money on a scheme to seize your property that we don’t wan t you to have, and are willing to take from you by force. with a gun.. using a pleasant and almost voluntary sounding and term.. ‘buy back your firearms’, using your money, that we take from you with the implicit threat of force, at the barrel of our guns, that you paid for, for entirely political reasons.. because we can..”

    I just can’t see how this didn’t resonate with the average Canadian.. perhaps they are just too stupid to appreciate the genius of it, or understand the context and branding.. Perhaps they are just bitter clingers and deplorables, bereft of empathy, and unable to understand that this is for their own good.. *Sigh* Cast not pearl, I suppose..

  4. So if you keep your legally bought guns you will become a criminal.
    If you comply with the buy back and then purchase illegal guns you will still be a criminal, but the government won’t know you have guns.
    I’m ok with that.

    1. Liberal Logic:
      … legal gun owners are required to declare,
      and if they don’t they become criminals,
      who do not have to declare.

      Under marxism, eventually everybody is a criminal.

  5. Retroactive criminality, and most canadians are A Ok with it because mommy government knows best. Shithole nation of coward sheep deserves it’s fate.

  6. Since this “law” was brought in to appease urban Quebec, how about the RCMP start their door-to-door searches and seizures in Quebec first, and see how that plays out.

  7. The government has already done a compliance test on current RCMP with mandating the jab.
    In the next emergency they might want additional muscle from retired police. Even if it’s just to watch that cattle cars are being loaded in an orderly manner. For the government anyone that signs up for confiscation enforcement is a definite keeper.

    The serious confiscation will be done by organized crime. In exchange for appropriate political donations there will be database leaks that somehow later coincide with burglaries that see stolen firearms on the streets.

    1. … “The serious confiscation will be done by organized crime”

      This is their inevitable move since they have all names & addresses,
      leaking that info will affect their purpose.

  8. I see a larger dynamic at play that is very positive in my view. Provinces in Canada, as well as citizens, are realizing that they don’t actually have to abide by absurd federal government’s dictates. Prairie provinces have told Ottawa “no” to federal initiatives like the consumer carbon tax, the industrial carbon tax, gun confiscation, gender transitioning of children, unrestrained MAID, safe supply drug programs. Quebec routinely tells Ottawa to pound sand. The notwithstanding clause is becoming trendy.

    What has the federal government done about provincial refusals to cooperate? They threatened and yelled but, in the end, they did nothing. Now those same provinces are making moves on the TFW program, mass immigration welfare funding, judicial appointments, etc. Citizens are refusing to comply with the gun confiscation program.

    Why is this important? I think provinces and citizens have embraced the power of no. And, having done so, they have learned that the federal government is a paper tiger. By continually pushing into the boundaries of provincial rights and personal freedom but then backing down when getting pushback…the federal government has inadvertently revealed how little power and control they actually have. The schoolyard bully that runs away when someone stands up to them. Frankly, I think provinces and citizens should push back even harder with their refusal to comply with the insanity of the federal Liberal government rules and regulations.

    1. Hence, the current Liberal appeal to the SCC, to neuter the Notwithstanding Clause.
      It’s a reprehensible action they’ve taken. There is a clear method to amending it, and that’s to amend the Charter. Of course, that opens up the Whole Charter for renegotiation.
      Even the cynical Liberals know that, in and of itself, is a Pit of Hell that no one wants to go near. Every province and noisy group (Indians) would want to gore someone else’s Ox.
      No, instead, the Liberals are taking the cynical route, appealing to their appointed judges, to change the charter, even ever so slightly, despite that being a legal act that is not in the authority of the SCC to determine whatsoever. That would be the act of a Star Chamber, if they proceed as the Liberals demand.
      The Liberals are dangerous control freaks. They cannot tolerate that others have fair, legal, justified standing, that declares the Liberals WRONG.
      For more info, see the illegal declaration of the EA, and how the Liberals still view that as justified, despite 2 levels of the court system saying NO, THEY ARE WRONG!

      1. Personally I think that if the Supreme Court and federal Liberal government conspire to neuter the very law that was meant to constrain their power then it will further erode the power of both the federal government and the Supreme Court. It will also increase support for the independence movements and further discredit the value of the Canadian constitution. The constitution would not have been signed by many provinces without the inclusion of the notwithstanding clause. The federal government and the Supreme Court have put themselves into a lose-lose situation, imo.

        The Supreme Court should have refused the case and told the federal government to amend the constitution using the amending formula.

        1. “The federal government and the Supreme Court have put themselves into a lose-lose situation”
          Problem is, they just don’t care. Ruling over the serfs is all these tyrants are concerned with.

          1. It’s would be a Pyrrhic victory at best because of what the reaction will be from provinces like Quebec, Alberta and Saskatchewan.

            “Pyrrhic victory, a success that brings such significant harm to the victor that it differs little from defeat.”

            Win a battle but lose the war. The war in this case being national unity, the respect for the Supreme Court and federal government. Plus it puts into question the validity of the Canadian constitution if key sections can be unilaterally changed by appointed, unelected judges without negotiation or consent of the provinces and without using the agreed upon amending formula.

  9. Liberals, being mentally retarded aliens, enact laws like human politicians might float out ‘trial balloons’.
    Canada’s firearm owners are recalcitrant, anti-marxist, non-Liberal voters… except injuns,
    Liberals love their toy injuns, and create extremely lenient laws (and judges) just for them.

    It’s important to emphasize these “AR type!” long guns were purchased with explicit Government approval,
    … before the same Government outlawed them.

    Similarly all legal hand gun owners received official Government approval to purchase,
    before Justin Trudeau outlawed handguns in 2022, then rescinded confiscation in 2024,
    crying, “owners can still use them but nobody can buy or sell them, ok?!”

    A quick summary:
    … the Enrolment Period for AR type so-called Buy-Back expired Mar 31st 2026
    … they were outlawed in 2020 with confiscation due that October
    … but amnesty for Surrender of Property has been declared every year
    … all firearm owners have received legal threatening letters from Arse EMP
    … but have naturally adopted a wait-and-see attitude regarding the next deadline of Oct 30th 2026

  10. I bought a pump-action shotgun last year.
    It’s obviously not on the government’s No-no List – I don’t have any of those – but it is on Buddy’s FAFO List.
    My guess is just about every gun owner has an acceptable tool, as I like to call them, that the government henchmen might have to acknowledge when they visit.

  11. Have your “lost my gun in a boating accident sir” excuse ready when the Mounties come a knocking.

    1. The problem is that the federal government and rcmp have no idea what type of guns people own. They only know what people have bought over the last few years when the new law started recording purchases. They know who has a PAL but not what they have in their gun cabinets. Then there’s all the Canadians who have firearms who do not have a PAL and are not purchasing hunting tags. There are quite literally millions of firearms owned by Canadians and no government agency knows who has them, how many they own or what type of firearms. The likelihood of law enforcement agreeing and provincial governments allowing them to go door to door to search millions of homes for firearms is virtually zero, resulting in the federal government looking foolish and incompetent.

      1. Not sure the feds have access to the purchase of hunting tags. If they do, the provinces should make that practice illegal. As for the federal government looking foolish and incompetent, that is their hallmark.

        1. If the federal government was able to find out who donated $5 to the freedom convoy and freeze their bank account then, yes, they could likely access hunting tag information too.

      2. But if they arrest you for something, ah, then they have a reason to search your residence.

        1. It would be a political nightmare if the rcmp becane political pawns and arrested people to be able to search their homes and confiscate their property. The federal rcmp went into people’s homes and confiscated their firearms after a mandatory evacuation order due to flooding in High River, Alberta about 20 years ago. That did not go over well, at all.

      3. They will count on draconian jail time for the few that they will catch to force the rest to comply.

  12. It is a good strategy to ignore most of the Liberal edicts. Those governed must consent to be governed. The Liberals do not represent the western and the rural constituents of the country.

  13. I’d like to believe that but 2% sounds low to me. The government claims about 57,000 guns were “declared.” That means that the total number covered by the prohibitions would be about 2.8 million. Were there that many on the banned list? Nobody really knows since many of them were not previously registered and thus invisible to the feds. Whatever the percentage it’s likely a pretty small fraction of the now prohibited total held by owners.

  14. I think 2% compliance is an ideal worth aspiring to. I don’t care if the federal ministry of gun compliance spends a quadrillion dollars pushing Canadians to give up the remaining 98% of arms, and I don’t care if my neighbor has 759 unregistered arms of all types in his basement.

    Everything the #Libranos say is a lie, all the #Libranos are liars and garbage people, as are the people who do their dirty deeds for them.

  15. Nothing humiliates Canadian politicians anymore. They are devoid of anything resembling shame or pride. But that’s hardly a surprise – because the electorates demand neither honour or accountability.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation