Reuters: FBI obtained Kash Patel and Susie Wiles phone records during Biden administration
Patel said he did not know the FBI’s purpose in seizing the phone records of him and Wiles, who became a top Trump adviser after he left office in 2021 and eventually co-campaign manager for his 2024 run against Biden. Patel also was a Trump political ally during this time. Patel said the collection of phone records extended into Wiles’ time as Trump’s co-campaign manager, though he did not say when exactly the record collection began or ended.
The FBI discovered the phone records in files categorized as “Prohibited,” which makes them difficult to discover on the bureau’s computer systems. Patel said he recently ended the FBI’s ability to categorize files as “Prohibited.”
Susie Wiles Lawyer Categorically DENIES He Allowed Biden FBI To Secretly Record Their Conversations
L – “…pushing the law past the breaking point!” – meme worthy, I predict a book, a movie and hundreds of PhD theses with that title.
Succinctly, what do you call pushing the law past the breaking point?
Succinctly, what do you call pushing the law past the breaking point?
I can certainly think of shorter ways to say it.
1. There is, indeed, such a recording.
2. No judge (regardelss of how partisan) would approve such a “wiretap”.
3. The FBI (if they are the ones who placed the tap) have committed a blatant criminal act, and a civil rights violation.
4. 10 FBI agents just got fired yesterday (as this news was released by Reuters)
It’s not just Jack Smith who has pushed the law past the breaking point.
The CIA and NSA have done it, and are almost certainly still doing it, by spying on Americans.
There also were the J6 political prisoners, the Obama regine sending guns to Mexican cartels, etc.
I should also have mentioned the Trump prosecutions.
Jack Smith undoubtedly thought:
a) the CIA and NSA routinely wiretap with impunity, why can’t I?
b) the Democrat vote rigging in 2020 was so successful, I’m never going to be prosecuted cause Republicans will never again get it.
c) if by some miracle I’m caught, I’ll be pardoned. I’m now wondering, does Jack Smith actually have a secret “Biden” pardon?
d) if I’m caught, there’s enough Democrat judges, I’ll never do time.
Question: will Jack Smith be prosecuted?
the irony.
doing this to the chap who winds up being the boss with access to
e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. and if *that* isnt true hooboy we’se in a heap of trubble.
I learned everything I need to know about government surveillance and data collection … from the NSA’s ‘Bumblehive’ Utah data collection mega center …
https://nsa.gov1.info/utah-data-center/
… when they couldn’t find HER missing 30,000 emails.
the powerds that be seem to have forgotten about Echelon
from the link “created in the late 1960s”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON
lm unawares any comprehensive electronic eavesdropping prior.
when telegrams went thru Britain during WW I a stiff upper lip top level brit refused to monitor said communications with a dismissive “gentlemen do not read other gentlemen’s mail”
not entirely unexpected seeing as the duke of windsor was a nazi sympathizer and a whole bunch of MI5 types were closet double agents. google kim philby. google guy burgess.
otoh NOW look at how many traitors theyre dealing with. all the judges all the cops all the politicians except 1 or 2. all the media, all the leftists. did l miss any? the commies have been replaced by the muzzies.
rule britannia.
The surveillance State only sees what they want you to see.
So nothing has changed since LBJ was using the apparatus of the state to spy on Goldwater and others.