One judicial smackdown apparently wasn’t enough …

BREAKING: Round two: Appeal filed on coal decision ruling.

At question:  Do a 12 year old, a podcaster and someone who doesn’t even live here get to kill 1100 coal-related jobs? According the Court of King’s Bench, no, they don’t. Governments get to make those sorts of decisions, and can’t be second guessed by the courts.

Well, these applicants are taking a second round at second guessing.

 

12 Replies to “One judicial smackdown apparently wasn’t enough …”

  1. This has little to do with age of the plaintiff … since every human on planet earth is the plaintiff.

    Fossil fuels are destroying our planet [sic] …
    Combustion of carbon based fuels MUST BE STOPPED … NOW. [sic]
    We can’t wait while the planet dies. [sic]

    You see … once you accept the basic premise of global warming as being manmade, and catastrophic to all human life … then you’ve lost the argument. Sadly … this is what UniParty Republicans …. like Pierre P. have done.

    The ONLY solution to their false premise is to STOP ALL fossil fuels NOW! Immediately! And your fellow Canadians BELIEVE this harder than any other people on the planet.

      1. Answer: MAID all the useless eaters. I’m still working … being a productive, taxpaying, member of society. I get to keep exhaling.

    1. Pierre P. is not a Republican.

      “…. And your fellow Canadians BELIEVE this harder than any other people on the planet.”

      And you know this how?

    2. BTW, [sic] is used to indicate a spelling, grammatical or punctuation error, not a false premise.

      1. “[sic]” is used to get your dog to attack. Also to indicate an exact quote – it means “thus” or “like this”, implying “he said thus”. Of course, when I say “[sic]”, I’m usually about to throw up, so stand well clear!

  2. One might ask why certain organizations are funding an environmental group that is well outside their area, but also why are governments? From their 2024 annual report:

    2nd Avenue Lofts
    Affinity Credit Union
    Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
    City of Saskatoon Department of SaskBuilds
    Procurement Green Communities Canada
    Nutrien
    RBC Foundation (Tech for Nature Fund)
    SaskAbilities
    Saskatoon Public Schools
    SaskEnergy
    TD Friends of the Environment
    Toronto Community Housing Corporation

    1. Also, why is the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission funding or partnering with an anti-nuclear group?

  3. Maybe someone should tell them they can sue the church for Acts of God (“force majeure” in contract law).

    I’m debating whether to sling some shade at a perennial anti-catholic here but making NMA lose his… brown eyes would probably make his week. From the release, after the… nah, not worth it.

  4. I pray whatever court hears this overturns the existing ruling and forces the coal plants retired. Only that kind of slap in the face has a chance to wake up some Canadian sheep and push Sask to separation. This will hasten the end of this failed joke of a shithole masquerading as a country.

Navigation