Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
I’m old, but at the end of AI research has to be some product we value. I am not sure where it is going beyond doing fake videos of important people saying ridiculous things. Maybe a robot arm that has perfected Five Finger Mary might have some universal appeal but past that I think they are reaching.
I would say, based solely on my (admittedly limited) understanding of the basics of digital computers, that some people who should have bloody well known better have just realized that this LLM software is -never- going to do what they thought it could. Now they are moving to limit the damage they have invited by buying into their own hype.
Huzzah.
Now, this is not to say that LLMs have no uses, or that they can’t make money. There will be stuff they can do. Navigating messy environments appears to be one of those things, so robots are going to get a lot smarter.
But, LLMs are -never- going to do all the things their inventors hoped for.
A minor example thought experiment. If A=B, and B=C, then A=C. Humans -understand- this statement. They can also derive this statement by observation, a generalization that describes something from the real world.
Some very powerful Silicon Valley people thought that LLMs would be able to do that too, but they can’t. And they never will. They can state it, they can use it as a rule in an algorithm, they can reproduce it by scanning text, but they can’t understand it. It is just a text string, no different than “Mary had a little lamb.”
I view this as a failure of the American educational establishment. Specifically English and Philosophy. They never told these kids how to figure out what a thing -IS-, or even to consider that important to know. So here we are, and knowing what an LLM really -IS- turns out to be worth billions and billions of dollars.
I’ve used Grok a lot and I’m impressed. Its understanding of English is excellent, even when I bugger up the spelling and grammar in my questions. And it gets humour and sarcasm. It could probably pass the Turing Test for intelligence. HAL is pretty much realized.