Academic papers by women and racial minorities were prioritized for publication by the American Political Science Review, according to a new report from the Goldwater Institute.
The policy is just one of the results of a takeover by the self-described “Feminist Collective” at the publication, run by the American Political Science Association and published by Cambridge University Press.
The all-female editorial group also shifted the journal’s focus to identity politics and away from topics such as the U.S. Constitution, the study from the Goldwater Institute concluded. The group lost power in 2024, however it may have approved some articles that were published into 2025, which covers the most recent set of issues. Goldwater’s report covered articles published between 2020 and 2025.[…]
Articles that the American Political Science Review published under the directives of the “Feminist Collective” include “Universal Suffrage as Decolonization,” “From Thin to Thick Representation: How a Female President Shapes Female Parliamentary Behavior,” and “Overcoming the Political Exclusion of Migrants: Theory and Experimental Evidence from India.”
I feel that the current crop of women out there have no honor. This is overwhelmingly my experience. They only do the right thing if it is convenient or enriches them personally. Otherwise they will do whatever they feel like at the time, and blame the rest of us when it all comes to tears. “But I’m a girl!”
I view this as a cultural evil of this dissolute socialist age, not a female thing. Some treasured few -do- have personal honor, despite all. They are pearls without price.
My daughter-in-Law has a PhD from Stanford in the hard sciences. She works for a major Biotech firm. She makes mountains of money. She deserves it all, as she is extremely competent, smart, and hard-working.
She speaks of helping to empower girls in STEM … yet fails to acknowledge how SHE was PERSONALLY “empowered”. Short answer: Tiger mom. Her Tiger mom pushed her, inspired her to greatness, and disciplined her. Her father too … but any male influence pales next to Tiger mom.
And yeah … she’s a Tiger mom too. It’s in her DNA. Although she does it with a slightly kinder, gentler hand.
Conclusion: How to “empower” girls? Be raised in a strong family. End of. Boys don’t need to be crushed to “empower” girls.
You can’t spell “biotech” without “bitch”.
What Western culture isn’t ready to admit is that it isn’t white women that are the problem, nor leftist women, nor childless women, nor any other subgroup you care to define.
It’s women. All of them. Whether you believe the Creator made men and woman different yet complementary, or you believe millennia of evolution produced very different psychologies due to the pressures of a dangerous environment is immaterial. Men and women think differently, are motivated differently, and behave very differently when they have temporal and social power as a large group. Yes, individual exceptions exist, but individuals aren’t societies.
The real tragedy is that there’s no putting this genie back in the bottle on our own. If the West is overrun by Islamic hordes that’s about the only way it’s going to reset, and blowing right by “reset” into “fifteen hundred years ago” isn’t much of an improvement.
If Karen ran the world…
https://notthebee.com/article/british-police-arrest-patel-patel-patel-patel–patel-for-robbery
“Feminist Collective” include “Universal Suffrage as Decolonization,” “From Thin to Thick Representation: How a Female President Shapes Female Parliamentary Behavior,”
Well … they got one thing right … these Female Fascists do tend to run on the thick, not thin side of physiognomy.
They’re thick in more ways than one.
From thin, to thick, to sea-going mammal.
I think it’s crucial for the non-Left to avoid bashing women, or anything women do. That’s too big a demographic to fool with. We need to ignore gender-baiting even when the point is valid.
Every change of leadership in a group or editorship at a magazine always has produced changes of policy. Some male readers think that history is about what the males in a group did. Some female readers think it is primarily about what the females did. We need to avoid being baited into anything the Left can twist into “See, girls, these evil conservatives hate it when women are editors or women’s issues are topics.”
Instead those who do and do not think of ourselves as “conservatives” could try “See, boys, when non-Left women are editors magazines will feature content of interest to women too, but non-Left women don’t feel a need to discriminate against men’s writing or men’s interests.”